Qualitative assessment of innovations in healthcare provision

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Porzsolt, Franz ^a   Ghosh, Amit K ^b   Kaplan, Robert M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; ECONOMICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; STANDARD;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 64249134320     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-50     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. JA Schumpeter, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London 1 1939
2. Quality, Innovation, and Cost Containment. M Macdonald, Can Nurse 1993 89 15 17 8457968
3. Reinventing VA Health Care Systematizing Quality improvement and Quality innovation. KW Kizer JG Demakis JR Feussner, Medical Care 2000 38 1 7 10630714
4. Quality, Innovation, and Value for Money. NICE and the British National Health Service. SD Pearson MD Rawlins, JAMA 2005 294 2618 2622 16304076
5. IQWiG: an opportunity lost? B Jönsson, Eur J Health Econ 2008 9 205 207 18496721
6. Comments by the Working Group for Methods of Economic Evaluation in Health Care (AG MEG) to IQWiG's Draft Guidelines "Methods for Assessment of the Relation of Benefits to Costs in the German Statutory Health Care System [Abstract in English]. C Krauth J John P Aidelsburger B Brüggenjürgen T Hansmeier F Hessel T Kohlmann J Moock H Rothgang B Schweikert R Seitz J Wasem AG Methoden der gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation, Gesundheitswesen 2008 70 1 16 18273757
7. Predictors of Successful Cancer prevention Programs. F Porzsolt A Kirner RM Kaplan, Recent Results Cancer Res 2009 181 19 31 19213553
8. Efficacy, Effectiveness and Efficiency of Diagnostic Technology. D Stengel F Porzsolt, Optimizing Health Improving the Value of Healthcare Delivery Springer, New York, Porzsolt F, Kaplan RM, 2006 217 231
9. Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. RC Battalio JH Kagel K Jiranyakul, J Risk Uncertainty 1990 3 25 50
10. Innovation, evidence and the real world. A surgeon's perspective on the treatment of three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease with drug-eluting stents. MS Uva, Rev Port Cardiol 2007 26 1199 1211 18297841
11. Relationship between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. NK Choudhry HAT Stelfox AS Detsky, JAMA 2002 287 612 617 11829700
12. Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 20002005. PM Ridker J Torres, JAMA 2006 295 2270 2274 16705108
13. Rationale and methods for a trial assessing placebo, echinacea, and doctor-patient interaction in the common cold. B Barrett D Rakel B Chewning L Marchand D Rabago R Brown J Scheder R Schmidt JE Gern K Bone G Thomas S Barlow J Bobula, Explore (NY) 2007 3 561 572 18005908
14. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. BC Choi AW Pak, Clin Invest Med 2007 30 6 E224 E232 18053389
15. A systematic review of motivational interviewing in physical health care settings. KM Knight L McGowan C Dickens C Bundy, Br J Health Psychol 2006 11 319 332 16643702
16. Commercial features of placebo and therapeutic efficacy. RL Waber B Shiv C Carmon D Ariely, JAMA 2008 299 1016 1017 18319411
17. The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered. SH Woolf RE Johnson, Ann Fam Med 2005 3 545 552 16338919
18. Perspectives on Medical Outsourcing and Telemedicine Rough Edges in a Flat World? SN Sing RM Wachter, N Engl J Med 2008 358 1622 1627 18403771
19. How physicians can change the future of health care. ME Porter EO Teisberg, JAMA 2007 297 1103 1111 17356031
20. Has NICE got it right? An international perspective considering the case of Technology Appraisal No. 98 by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). M Schlander, Curr Med Res Opin 2008 24 951 966 18279581
21. The NICE ADHD health technology assessment: A review and critique. M Schlander, Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2008 2 1 9 18197978
22. Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine. H Lambert, Soc Sci Med 2006 62 11 2633 2645 16387399
23. Redesigning health systems for quality: lessons from emerging practices. MC Wang JK Hyun MI Harrison SM Shortell I Fraser, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006 32 11 599 611 17120919