Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine IV-PCA for postoperative pain management: Survey of healthcare provider opinion

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 293-301

  Bonnet, Francis ^a,i   Eberhart, L ^b   Wennberg, E ^c   Dodds, S J ^d   Van Bellinghen, L ^e   Annemans, L ^f   Kavanagh, S ^g   Choe, Y ^h  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e IQVIA   (United States)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^g JANSSEN RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Belgium)

^h JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

ⁱ HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

Author keywords

Delphi panel; Fentanyl ITS; IV PCA; Postoperative pain; Staff time estimation

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MORPHINE; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELPHI STUDY; EUROPE; FRANCE; GERMANY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IONTOPHORESIS; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RECALL BIAS; SELF CARE; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM; VASCULAR ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRADERMAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; DATA COLLECTION; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FENTANYL; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MORPHINE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

EID: 64249102659     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: 14734877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/03007990802631321     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, et al. Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:43-53 (Pubitemid 33710299)
2. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Survey of physicians and nurses. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1999. Available at: http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/ 1503-index.cfm [Last accessed 9 May 2008]
3. Sheward L, Hunt J, Hagen S, et al. The relationship between UK hospital nurse staffing and emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction. J Nurs Manag 2005;13:51-60
4. Strassels SA, McNicol E, Suleman R. Postoperative pain management: a practical review, part 1. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1904-1916 (Pubitemid 41324175)
5. Mordin M, Anastassopoulos K, van Breda A, et al. Clinical staff resource use with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in acute postoperative pain management: results from a multicenter, prospective, observational study. J Perianesth Nurs 2007;22:243-255
6. Koo PJ. Postoperative pain management with a patient-controlled transdermal delivery system for fentanyl. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1171-1176 (Pubitemid 40741056)
7. Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Tait S, et al. An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006;102:188-194 (Pubitemid 43038306)
8. Harding G, Vallow S, Leidy NK, et al. Ease of care with patient controlled analgesia systems: questionnaire development and validation. J Adv Nurs 2007;59:530-541
9. Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, et al. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:806-815 (Pubitemid 47072593)
10. Hartrick CT, Bourne MH, Gargiulo K, et al. Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:546-554 (Pubitemid 44810090)
11. Minkowitz HS, Rathmell JP, Vallow S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery. Pain Med 2007;8:657-668 (Pubitemid 350142913)
12. Viscusi ER, Siccardi M, Damaraju CV, et al. The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1428-1436 (Pubitemid 350303953)
13. Pestano C, Nelson W, Schein JR, et al. Postoperative pain management following total hip replacement: ease of care with the fentanyl HCl patient-activated transdermal system (pats) versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine from the perspective of the nurse. Annual Congress of the National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses; 2006 May 20-24. Boston, MA
14. Phillips S, Vallow S, Gargiulo K, et al. Ease of care of postoperative pain management following total hip replacement: fentanyl HCl patient-activated transdermal system (fentanyl HCl pats) versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IC PCA) pump. Annual Fall Pain Meeting and Workshops of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine; 2005 Nov 17-20. Miami Beach, FL
15. Yarmush J, Vallow S, Gargiulo K, et al. Postoperative pain management using the fentanyl HCl patient-activated transdermal system (fentanyl HCl pats) versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) following abdominal or pelvic surgery: evaluation of ease of care. Annual Fall Pain Meeting and Workshops of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine; 2005 Nov 17-20. Miami Beach, FL
16. Dalkey NC. The Delphi Method: an experimental study of group opinion. Rand Corporation, 1969. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research- memoranda/RM5888/[Last accessed 21 Jul 2006]
17. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., 1975
18. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, 2001. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/levels-of-evidence.asp [Last accessed 29 Nov 2006]
19. Evans C, Schein J, Nelson W, et al. Improving patient and nurse outcomes: a comparison of nurse tasks and time associated with two patient-controlled analgesia modalities using delphi panels. Pain Manag Nurs 2007;8:86-95
20. Campbell JP, Maxey VA, Watson WA. Hawthorne effect: implications for prehospital research. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:590-594
21. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hiatt L, et al. Quality of care for hypertension in the United States. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2005;5:1-9 (Pubitemid 40190552)
22. van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, van Limbeek J, et al. Use of the Delphi Technique for developing national clinical guidelines for prescription of lower-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:693-704
23. Wagenaar D, Colenda CC, Kreft M, et al. Treating depression in nursing homes: practice guidelines in the real world. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2003;103:465-469 (Pubitemid 37323073)
24. Iavicoli S, Rondinone B, Marinaccio A, et al. Identification of research priorities in occupational health. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:71-72 (Pubitemid 40175502)
25. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A. Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:24-33
26. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002;288:1987-1993 (Pubitemid 35204688)
27. Lankshear AJ, Sheldon TA, Maynard A. Nurse staffing and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review of the international research evidence. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2005;28:163-174 (Pubitemid 40805859)
28. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, et al. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1715-1722 (Pubitemid 34547486)
29. Rogers AE, Hwang WT, Scott LD, et al. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:202-212 (Pubitemid 38960703)
30. Guevara E, Mendias E. A comparative analysis of the changes in nursing practice related to health sector reform in five countries of the Americas. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002;12:347-353 (Pubitemid 35351037)