Reliability estimates of clinical measures between minimum data set and online survey certification and reporting data of us nursing homes

Medical Care

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 492-495

  Zhang, Ning Jackie ^a,b   Paek, Seung Chun ^a   Wan, Thomas T H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical measures; MDS; Nursing homes; OSCAR; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERNET; NURSING HOME; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UNITED STATES; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

CERTIFICATION; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; INTERNET; NURSING HOMES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 64249096156     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818c014b     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, et al. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30:293-307.
2. Morris JN, Nonemaker S, Murphy K, et al. A commitment to change: revision of HCFA's RAI. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1011-1016.
3. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, et al. Reliability estimates for the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). Gerontologist. 1995;35:172-178.
4. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M174-M182.
5. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, et al. Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M128~ M133.
6. Karon SL, Sainfort F, Zimmerman DR. Stability of nursing home quality indicators over time. Med Care. 1999;37:570-579.
7. Berg K, Mor V, Morris J, et al. Identification and evaluation of existing nursing homes quality indicators. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;23:19-36.
8. Lum TY, Lin WC, Kane RL. Use of proxy respondents and accuracy of minimum data set assessments of activities of daily living. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:654-659.
9. Stevenson KB, Moore JW, Sleeper B. Validity of the minimum data set in identifying urinary tract infections in residents of long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:707-711.
10. Mullan JT, Harrington C. Nursing home deficiencies in the United States: a conformatory factor analysis. Res Aging. 2001;23:503-531.
11. Zhang NJ, Wan TT. The measurement of nursing home quality: multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of panel data. J Med Syst. 2005;29: 401-411.
12. General Accounting Office. Nursing Homes: Federal Efforts to Monitor Resident Assessment Data Should Complement State Activities. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2002.
13. General Accounting Office. Nursing Homes: Public Reporting of Quality Indicators has Merit, but National Implementation is Premature. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2002.
14. Schnelle JF. Determining the relationship between staffing and quality. Gerontologist. 2004;44:10-12.
15. Bostick JE, Rantz MJ, Flesner MK, et al. Systematic review of studies of staffing and quality in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7: 366-376.
16. Office of Inspector General. Nursing Home Resident Assessment Quality of Care. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. Publication No. OEI-02-99-00040.
17. Mor V. A comprehensive clinical assessment tool to inform policy and practice: applications of the minimum data set. Med Care. 2004; 42(Suppl 4), III50-III59.
18. General Accounting Office. Nursing Homes: Additional Steps Needed to Strengthen Enforcement of Federal Quality Standards. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 1999.
19. Polit DF, Hungler BP, eds. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Willams & Wilkins; 1999.