Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of certain neoteleostean fishes from the Upper Cretaceous of Sendenhorst, Germany

Cretaceous Research

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 559-574

  Dietze, Kathrin ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTION AND BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Campanian; Eurypterygii incerta sedis; Morphology; Myctophiformes; Phylogeny; Polymixiiformes

Indexed keywords

CAMPANIAN; CLADISTICS; CRETACEOUS; MORPHOLOGY; NEW SPECIES; PALEOGENE; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY; TELEOST;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

ACANTHOMORPHA; ALEPISAURUS; AULOPIFORMES; BERYCIFORMES; CHAULIODUS; ELECTRONA; EURYPTERYGII; INCERTA_SEDIS; LAMPADENA; MELAMPHAES; MYCTOPHIDAE; MYCTOPHIFORMES; NEOSCOPELIDAE; NOTOLEPIS; PISCES; POLYMIXIA; POLYMIXIIFORMES; SCOPELENGYS; STOMIIFORMES; VINCIGUERRIA;

EID: 64149092330     PISSN: 01956671     EISSN: 1095998X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2008.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Agassiz L. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles (1833-44), Soleure and Petitpierre, Neuchâtel 1420 pp.
2. Ahlstrom E.H., Richards W.J., and Weitzman S.H. Gonostomatidae, Sternoptychidae, and associated stomiiform groups: development and relationships. In: Moser H.G., Richards W.J., Cohen D.M., Fahay M.P., Kendall Jr. A.W., and Richardson S.L. (Eds). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (1984), American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologist, Special publications, Lawrence, KS 184-198
3. Arambourg C. Les poissons crétacés du Djebel Tselfat (Maroc). Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 118 (1954) 1-188
4. Arratia G. Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. Palaeo Ichthologica 7 (1997) 5-168
5. Baldwin C.C., and Johnson G.D. Interrelationships of Aulopiformes. In: Stiassny M., Parenti L., and Johnson G.D. (Eds). Interrelationships of Fishes (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, California 355-404
6. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (1988) 795-803
7. Cavin L. Occurrence of a juvenile teleost, Enchodus sp., in a fish gut content from the Upper Cretaceous of Goulmima, Morocco. Special Papers in Palaeontology 60 (1993) 57-72
8. Chalifa Y., and Tchernov E. Pachyamia latimaxillaris, a new genus and species (Actinopterygii: Amiidae) from the Cenomanian of Jerusalem. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2 (1982) 269-285
9. Cope E.D. Description of the fishes from the Cretaceous and Tertiary deposits West of the Mississippi river. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 4 (1878) 67-77
10. Cope E.D. Geology and paleontology. American Naturalist 21 (1887) 1014-1019
11. Costa O.G. Descrizione di alcuni pesci fossili del Libano. Memoires dell Accademia Reale di Scienze di Napoli 2 (1857) 97-112
12. Davis J.W. The fossil fishes of the Chalk of Mount Lebanon, in Syria. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 3 (1887) 457-636
13. Dietze K. Description of the Late Cretaceous teleost Dactylopogon grandis von der Marck (Westphalia, Germany). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 232 (2004) 181-194
14. Dingerkus G., and Uhler L.D. Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technology 52 (1977) 229-232
15. Dixon F. The geology and fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations of Sussex (1850), Published by the author, London 422 pp.
16. Fielitz, C., 1999. The phylogenetic analysis of the family Enchodontidae and its relationship to Recent members of the order Aulopiformes. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 86 pp.
17. Fielitz C. The phylogenetic relationships of the Enchodontidae (Teleostei: Aulopiformes). In: Arratia G., Wilson V.H., and Cloutier R. (Eds). Recent advances in the origin and early radiation of vertebrates (2004), Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München 619-634
18. Fink W.L., and Weitzman S.H. Relationships of the stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a description of Diplophos. Bulletin of the Musuem of Comparative Zoology 150 (1982) 31-93
19. Forey P.L. A revision of elopomorph fishes, fossil and Recent. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology Supplements 10 (1973) 1-222
20. Forey P.L., Littlewood D.T.J., Ritchie P., and Meyer A. Interrelationships of Elopomorph Fishes. In: Stiassny M., Parenti L., and Johnson G.D. (Eds). Interrelationships of Fishes (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, California 175-191
21. Fraser-Brunner A. A classification of the fishes of the family Myctophidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 118 (1949) 1019-1107
22. Gaudant M. Contribution à une révision des poissons crétacés. du Jbel Tselfat (Rides prérifaines, Maroc). Notes du Service Géologique du Maroc 39 (1978) 79-124
23. Gayet M. Gonorhynchoidei du Crétacé supérieur marin du Liban et relations phylogénétiques des Charitosomidae nov. fam. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon 126 (1993) 1-131
24. Gibbs R.H., and Willimovsky N.J. Family Alepisauridae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 5 (1966), Yale University, New Haven 482-497
25. Gill T.N. A comparison of antipodal faunas (1893), Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington 6 91-124
26. Goody P.C. The relationships of certain Upper Cretaceous teleosts with special reference to the myctophoids. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology Supplements 7 (1969) 1-255
27. Goody P.C. Sedenhorstia dayi (Hay), a new Elopoid from the Cenomanian of Hajula in the Lebanon. American Museum Novitates 2358 (1969) 1-23
28. Gregorova, R., 1997. Deep sea fishes of the Tertiary (Oligocene) of the Carpathians. In: Bianco, P.G. (Ed.). Fish Biodiversity Book of Abstracts. Ninth International Congress of European Ichthyologists (CE 19), Napoli, Trieste, pp. 41.
29. Grey M. Family Gonostomatidae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 4 (1964), Yale University, New Haven pp. 77-240
30. Hay O.P. On a collection of Upper Cretaceous fishes from Mount Lebanon, Syria, with description of four new genera and nineteen new species. Bulletin of the American Museum Natural History 19 (1903) 395-452
31. Harold A.S., and Weitzman S. Interrelationships of Stomiiform Fishes. In: Stiassny M., Parenti L., and Johnson G.D. (Eds). Interrelationships of Fishes (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, California 333-353
32. Hesemann J. Geologie Nordrhein-Westfalens. Bochumer geographische Arbeiten, Sonderreihe Band 2 (1975), Schöningh Verlag, Paderborn 416 pp.
33. Hückel U. Die Fischschiefer von Haqel und Hjoula in der Oberkreide des Libanon. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 135 (1970) 1-18
34. Huxley T.H. On the applications of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880 (1880) 649-662
35. Johnson G.D. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosquamata. Copeia 1992 (1992) 8-25
36. Jollie M. Chordate Morphology (1962), Chapman and Hall, London 478 pp.
37. Kaever M., and Lommerzheim A. The highest Campanian in the transitional area between the boreal and the Tethyan realms in NW-Germany: implications for stratigraphy, facies, palaeooceanography and palaeoclimatology. Münstersche Forschung zur Geologie und Paläontologie 77 (1995) 293-327
38. Kawaguchi K., and Moser H.G. Stomiatoidea: development. In: Moser H.G., Richards W.J., Cohen D.M., Fahay M.P., Kendall Jr. A.W., and Richardson S.L. (Eds). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (1984), American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologist, Special publications, Lawrence, KS 169-181
39. Keene M.J., and Tighe K.A. Beryciformes: development and relationships. In: Moser H.G., Richards W.J., Cohen D.M., Fahay M.P., Kendall Jr. A.W., and Richardson S.L. (Eds). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (1984), American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologist, Special publications, Lawrence, KS 383-392
40. Landois H. Die Familie Megistopodes, Riesenbauchflosser. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 2 (1894) 228-235
41. von der Marck W. Über einige Wirbeltiere, Kruster und Cephalopoden der Westfälischen Kreide. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 10 (1858) 231-271
42. von der Marck W. Fossile Fische, Krebse und Pflanzen aus den Plattenkalken der jüngsten Kreide aus Westfalen. Palaeontographica 11 (1863) 1-83
43. von der Marck W. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der fossilen Fische und anderer Tierreste aus der jüngsten Kreide Westfalens. Palaeontographica 22 (1873) 55-74
44. von der Marck W. Dritter Nachtrag. Fische der oberen Kreide Westfalens. Palaeontographica 31 (1885) 233-267
45. von der Marck W., and Schlüter C. Neue Fische und Krebse der Kreide von Westfalen. Palaeontographica 15 (1868) 269-305
46. Morrow J.E. Family Chauliodontidae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 4 (1964), Yale University, New Haven 274-289
47. Moser H.G., Ahlstrom E.H., and Paxton J.R. Myctophidae: development. In: Moser H.G., Richards W.J., Cohen D.M., Fahay M.P., Kendall Jr. A.W., and Richardson S.L. (Eds). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (1984), American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologist, Special publications, Lawrence, KS 218-239
48. Nafpaktitis B.G. Family Neoscopelidae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 7 (1977), Yale University, New Haven 1-12
49. Nafpaktitis B.G., Backus R.H., Craddock J.E., Haedrich R.L., Robison B.H., and Karnella C. Family Myctophidae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 7 (1977), Yale University, New Haven 13-265
50. Parenti L.R., and Song J. Phylogenetic significance of the pectoral-pelvic fin association in acanthomorph fishes: A reassessment using comparative neuroanatomy. In: Stiassny M., Parenti L., and Johnson G.D. (Eds). Interrelationships of Fishes (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, California 427-444
51. Patterson C. A review of Mesozoic acanthopterygian fishes, with special reference to those of the English Chalk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 247 (1964) 213-482
52. Patterson C. The contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. In: Hecht M.K., Goody P.C., and Hecht B.M. (Eds). Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. NATO Advanced Study Institute Series A: Life Sciences vol. 14 (1977) 579-643
53. Patterson C. Osteichthyes: Teleostei. In: Benton M.J. (Ed). The Fossil Record 2 (1993), Chapman and Hall, London 621-656
54. Paxton J.R. Osteology and Relationships of the Lanternfishes (Fam. Myctophidae). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County 13 (1972) 1-81
55. Paxton J.R., Ahlstrom E.H., and Moser H.G. Myctophidae: relationships. In: Moser H.G., Richards W.J., Cohen D.M., Fahay M.P., Kendall Jr. A.W., and Richardson S.L. (Eds). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (1984), American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologist, Special publications, Lawrence, KS 239-244
56. Pictet F.-J., and Humbert A. Nouvelles rechérches sur le poissons fossiles du Mont Liban (1866), Baillière et fils, Genève 115 pp.
57. Prokofiev A.M. A new genus of Neoscopelidae for Eomyctophum gracile Daniltshenko from the Middle Eocene of Georgia (Pisces: Osteichthyes: Neoscopelidae). Zoosystematica Rossica 10 (2001) 215-218
58. Prokofiev A.M. Morphology and Relationships of Neocassandra mica Daniltshenko, 1968 (Pisces; Aulopiformes; Neocassandridae fam. nov.) from the late Paleocene of Turkmenistan. Paleontologichesky Zhurnal 1 (2002) 69-76
59. Reading H.G. Sedimentary environments and facies. second edn. (1986), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 615 pp.
60. Regan C.T. The anatomy and classification of the Teleostean fishes of the order Iniomi. Annals and Magazine for Natural History 8 (1909) 1-9
61. Regan C.T. The anatomy and classification of the Scombroid fishes. Annals and Magazine for Natural History 8 (1911) 66-75
62. Rofen R.R. Family Paralepididae. In: Memoir I Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Ed). Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 5 (1966), Yale University, New Haven 205-461
63. Rosen D.E. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes. In: Greenwood P.H., Miles R.S., and Patterson C. (Eds). Interrelationships of fishes (1973), Academic Press, London 397-513
64. Rosen D.E. An essay on euteleostean classification. American Museum Novitates 2827 (1985) 1-57
65. Rosen D.E., and Patterson C. The structure and relationships of the paracanthopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141 (1969) 357-474
66. Russell D.A. Vertebrates in the Cretaceous Western Interior Sea. In: Caldwell W.G.E., and Kauffman E.G. (Eds). Evolution of the Western Interior Basin 39 (1993), Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 665-680
67. Siegfried P. Die Fisch-Fauna des westfälischen Ober-Senons. Palaeontographica A 106 (1954) 1-36
68. Sorenson M.D. TreeRot, version 2 (1999), Boston University, Boston, MA
69. Stiassny M.L.J. The limits and relationships of the acanthomorph teleosts. Journal of Zoology (B) 1 (1986) 411-460
70. Stiassny M.L.J. Basal Ctenosquamate Relationships and the Interrelationships of the Myctophiform (Scopelomorph) Fishes. In: Stiassny M., Parenti L., and Johnson G.D. (Eds). Interrelationships of Fishes (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, California 405-426
71. Swofford D.L. PAUP* -phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4 (2003), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
72. White E.J., and Moy-Thomas J.A. Notes on the nomenclature of fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History London 2 (1940) 98-103
73. Woodward A.S. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History) IV (1901), British Museum of Natural History, London 636 pp.
74. Woodward A.S. The fossil fishes of the English chalk, part I (1902), Palaeontographical Society London 1-56
75. Zumoffen G. Geólogie du Liban (1926), Barrèrre, Paris 165 pp.