The legacy of the person-situation debate for understanding variability in emotional experience

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 255-256

  Kuppens, Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Emotion; Person situation debate

Indexed keywords

EID: 64049111199     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Griner L.A., and Smith C.A. Contributions of motivational orientation to appraisal and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 727-740
2. Kuppens P., and Van Mechelen I. Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self-esteem, other-blame, and frustration. Cognition and Emotion 21 (2007) 56-77
3. Kuppens P., Van Mechelen I., Smits D.J.M., De Boeck P., and Ceulemans E. Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition and Emotion 21 (2007) 689-713
4. Mischel W., and Shoda Y. Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1998) 229-258
5. Scherer K.R., Schorr A., and Johnstone T. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (2001), Oxford University Press, New York