Nonlinear spectroscopy with entangled photons: Manipulating quantum pathways of matter

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Roslyak, Oleksiy ^a   Marx, Christoph A ^a   Mukamel, Shaul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREE OF ENTANGLEMENTS; ENTANGLED PHOTONS; FIELD INTENSITIES; LASER FIELDS; MATERIAL RESPONSE; NEW MATERIALS; NON-LINEAR RESPONSE; NONCLASSICAL FIELDS; NONLINEAR SPECTROSCOPIES; OPTICAL SIGNALS; POWER-LAW DEPENDENCES; PUMP-PROBE EXPERIMENTS; QUANTUM PATHWAYS; TWO PHOTON ABSORPTIONS;

MULTIPHOTON PROCESSES; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE PHENOMENA;

PHOTONS;

EID: 64049110843     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.033832     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. S. Haroche and J. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities and Photons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
2. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460
3. H. Kimble and S. van Enk, Nature (London) 429, 712 (2004). 10.1038/429712a
4. Q. A. Turchette, C. S. Wood, B. E. King, C. J. Myatt, D. Leibfried, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3631 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3631
5. P. Walther, J. Pan, M. Aspelmeyer, R. Ursin, S. Gasparoni, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 429, 158 (2004). 10.1038/nature02552
6. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
7. O. Benson, C. Santori, M. Pelton, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2513 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2513
8. H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691 (1977). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.691
9. K. Edamatsu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 46, 7175 (2007). 10.1143/JJAP.46.7175
10. J. Javanainen and P. L. Gould, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5088 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.5088
11. C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2409 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2409
12. B. Dayan, Phys. Rev. A 76, 043813 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.043813
13. F. Lissandrin, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Phys. Rev. B 69, 165317 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.165317
14. M. Teich and B. Saleh, U.S. Patent 5796477 (1998).
15. B. E. A. Saleh, B. M. Jost, H. B. Fei, and M. C. Teich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3483 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3483
16. A. Pe'er, B. Dayan, A. A. Friesem, and Y. Silberberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 073601 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.073601
17. B. Dayan, A. Pe'er, A. A. Friesem, and Y. Silberberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 043602 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.043602
18. D. Lee and T. Goodson, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 25582 (2006). 10.1021/jp066767g
19. D. Lee and T. Goodson III, Proc. SPIE 6653, 66530V (2007). 10.1117/12.745492
20. A. Kolkiran and G. S. Agarwal, Opt. Express 16, 6479 (2008). 10.1364/OE.16.006479
21. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
22. C. A. Marx, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 77, 022110 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022110
23. R. Glauber, Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence: Selected Papers and Lectures (Wiley-VCH, New York, 2007).
24. C. Gerry and P. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
25. E. M. Nagasako, S. J. Bentley, R. W. Boyd, and G. S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A 64, 043802 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.043802
26. The deviation from the χ (2) description has been proposed by utilizing different propagations of the photons constituting the biphoton. However, for thin nonlinear crystals, when one can achieve a substantial photon flux, this effect is negligible.
27. O. Roslyak and S. Mukamel, Opt. Express 17, 1093 (2009). 10.1364/OE.17.001093