Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance?. Evidence from the Dutch software sector

Research Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 746-755

  Weterings, Anet ^a   Boschma, Ron ^b  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovation; Software sector; Spatial proximity; User producer interactions

Indexed keywords

FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTIONS; INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE; INTERACTIVE LEARNING; NEW PRODUCTS; SOFTWARE FIRMS; SOFTWARE SECTOR; SPATIAL PROXIMITY; USER-PRODUCER INTERACTIONS;

EID: 64049108076     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
2. Asheim B., and Isaksen A. Regional innovation systems: the integration of local 'sticky' and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (2002) 77-86
3. Bathelt H., Malmberg A., and Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28 (2004) 31-56
4. Belderbos R., Carree M., and Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 33 (2004) 1477-1492
5. Bleichrodt, H., Louter, P.J., Sleegers, W.F., 1992. Young Economic Activities in The Netherlands: An Economic Geography Perspective. EGI-research publication No. 02, Economic Geographic Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam (in Dutch).
6. Boschma R.A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies 39 (2005) 61-74
7. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., 2003. Mobility and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited, CESPRI working paper No. 142, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation Process, Universita Bocconi, Milan.
8. Brouwer E., and Kleinknecht A. Determinants of innovation: a microeconometric analysis of three alternative innovation output indicators. In: Kleinknecht A. (Ed). Determinants of Innovation (1996), MacMillan Press, London 99-124
9. Brown J.S., and Duguid P. Mysteries of the region: knowledge dynamics in Silicon Valley. In: Lee C.-M. (Ed). The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2000), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto 16-39
10. Chabchoub N., and Niosi J. Explaining the propensity to patent computer software. Technovation 25 (2005) 971-978
11. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990) 128-152
12. Conway S. Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an empirical study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 7 (1995) 327-342
13. Cowan R., David P.A., and Foray D. The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (2000) 211-254
14. Djellal, G., Gallouj, F., 2000. Innovation surveys for service industries: a review. Paper presented at the DG Enterprise Conference on 'Innovation and Enterprise Creation, Statistics and Indicators', Sophia Antipolis, France, October 2000.
15. Freel M.S. Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy 32 (2003) 751-770
16. Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20 (1991) 499-514
17. Gallaud D., and Torre A. Geographical proximity and the diffusion of knowledge. In: Fuchs G., Shapira P., and Koch A. (Eds). Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change. Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough? (2005), Springer Verlag, Dordrecht 127-146
18. Gallouj F. Innovation in services and the attendant old and new myths. Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (2002) 137-154
19. Gertler M.S. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3 (2003) 75-99
20. Giuliani E., and Bell M. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy 34 (2005) 47-68
21. Grabher G. The Embedded Firm. On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks (1993), Routledge, London
22. Hollenstein H. Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data. Research Policy 32 (2003) 845-863
23. Howells J.R.L. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies 39 (2002) 871-884
24. Isaksen A. Knowledge-based clusters and urban location: the clustering of the software consultancy in Oslo. Urban Studies 41 (2004) 1157-1174
25. Kleinknecht A., Van Montfort K., and Brouwer E. How Consistent are Innovation Indicators? A Factor Analysis of CIS Data, Research Memorandum 2000-28 (2000), Free University, Amsterdam
26. Knoben J., Oerlemans L.A.G., and Rutten R.P.J.H. The effects of spatial mobility on the performance of firms. Economic Geography 84 (2008) 157-184
27. Kogut B., and Zander R. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science 7 (1996) 502-518
28. Lissoni F. Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of the Breschia mechanical cluster. Research Policy 30 (2001) 1479-1500
29. Lundvall B.-A. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Frances Printer, London 349-369
30. Malmberg A., and Maskell P. The elusive concept of localisation economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A 34 (2002) 429-449
31. Nelson R.R. National innovation systems. In: Acs Z. (Ed). Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change (2000), Printer, London 11-26
32. Nelson R.R., and Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
33. Nooteboom B. Innovation, learning and industrial organization. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (1999) 127-150
34. Oerlemans L.A.G., Meeus M.T.H., and Boekema F.M.W. Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Geography 89 (1998) 298-309
35. Ragatz G.L., Handfield R.B., and Scannell T.V. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product and Innovation Management 14 (1997) 190-220
36. Rallet A., and Torre A. Is geographical proximity necessary in innovation networks in the era of global economy?. GeoJournal 49 (2000) 373-380
37. Romijn H., and Albu M. Innovation, networking and proximity: lessons from small high technology firms in the UK. Regional Studies 36 (2002) 81-86
38. Stam E., 2003. Why Butterflies don't Leave. Locational Evolution of Evolving Enterprises. Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht (dissertation).
39. Steiner, M., Adametz, C., Novakovic, M., 2001. Measuring innovation-orientated activities for business services: traditional versus knowledge based indicators. Paper presented at the 41st Conference of the European Regional Science Association, August, Zagreb, Croatia.
40. Tether B.S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why? An empirical analysis. Research Policy 31 (2002) 947-967
41. Tether B.S. The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12 (2003) 481-505
42. Torre A., and Rallet A. Proximity and localisation. Regional Studies 39 (2005) 47-59
43. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997) 35-67
44. Von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation (1988), Oxford University Press, New York
45. Weterings, A., 2006. Do firms benefit from spatial proximity? Netherlands Geographical Studies 336. KNAG/Faculty of GeoSciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht (dissertation).