Correlation of point-of-care international normalized ratio to laboratory international normalized ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 99-104

  Hoel, Robert W ^a   Albright, Robert C ^a   Beyer, Lisa K ^a   Santrach, Paula J ^a   Magtibay, Donna L ^a   Everson, Stephanie L ^a   McBane, Robert D ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WARFARIN; ANTIANEMIC AGENT; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

AGED; ANEMIA; ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALYSIS CATHETER; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; LABORATORY TEST; LONG TERM CARE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; RELIABILITY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; BLOOD; BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSIS, MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG MONITORING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FINGER; HEMATOCRIT; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INDWELLING CATHETER; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANEMIA; ANTICOAGULANTS; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL; BLOOD COAGULATION; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CLINICAL LABORATORY TECHNIQUES; DRUG MONITORING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FINGERS; HEMATINICS; HEMATOCRIT; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; MALE; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL DIALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WARFARIN;

EID: 64049099886     PISSN: 15559041     EISSN: 1555905X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03360708     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Sunderji R, Gin K, Shalansky K, Carter C, Chambers K, Davies C, Schwartz L, Fung A: Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation. Am J Clin Pathol 123: 184-188, 2005 (Pubitemid 40194077)
2. McBane RD II, Felty CL, Hartgers ML, Chaudhry R, Beyer LK, Santrach PJ: Importance of device evaluation for point-of- care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs. Mayo Clin Proc 80: 181-186, 2005 (Pubitemid 40194532)
3. Murray ET, Fitzmaurice DA, McCahon D: Point of care testing for INR monitoring: Where are we now? Br J Haematol 127: 373-378, 2004 (Pubitemid 39536589)
4. Chaudhry R, Scheitel SM, Stroebel RJ, Santrach PJ, Dupras DM, Tangalos EG: Patient satisfaction with point-of-care international normalized ratio testing and counseling in a community internal medicine practice. Manage Care Interface 17: 44-46, 2004 (Pubitemid 38365477)
5. Shermock KM, Bragg L, Connor JT, Fink J, Mazzoli G, Kottke-Marchant K. Differences in warfarin dosing decisions based on international normalized ratio measurements with two point-of-care testing devices and a reference laboratory measurement. Pharmacotherapy 22: 1397-1404, 2002 (Pubitemid 35266375)
6. Roche Diagnostics. Technical information on CoaguChek S, Indianapolis, Roche Diagnostics, 2004
7. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310, 1986 (Pubitemid 16134762)
8. Kagansky N, Knobler H, Rimon E, Ozer Z, Levy S: Safety of anticoagulation therapy in well-informed older patients. Arch Intern Med 164: 2044-2050, 2004 (Pubitemid 39390563)