Insights into the effects of tensile and compressive loadings on microstructure dependent fracture of trabecular bone

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 76, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 884-897

  Tomar, Vikas ^a  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Cohesive zone modeling; Dynamic fracture

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; COHESIVE FINITE ELEMENT METHODS; COHESIVE ZONE MODELING; COMPRESSIVE FRACTURES; COMPRESSIVE LOADINGS; CRACK DENSITIES; DYNAMIC FRACTURE; ENERGY RELEASE; EXTERNAL LOADINGS; FAILURE MECHANISMS; FINAL FAILURES; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FRACTURE MECHANISMS; FRACTURE RESISTANCES; FRACTURE STRENGTHS; INITIAL DAMAGES; MICRO CRACKS; MICRO-CRACK FORMATIONS; MICRO-SCALE; RANDOM VARIATIONS; STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENTS; TENSILE AND COMPRESSIVE LOADINGS; TENSILE LOADINGS; TISSUE PROPERTIES; TRABECULAR BONES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BONE; CRACK PROPAGATION; CRACKING (CHEMICAL); CRACKS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; LOADING; MICROSTRUCTURE;

FRACTURE;

EID: 64049092815     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Jaasma M.J., Bayraktar H.H., Niebur G.L., and Keaveny T.M. Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone. J Biomech 35 2 (2002) 237-246
2. Peterlik H., Roschger P., Klaushofer K., and Fratzl P. From brittle to ductile fracture of bone. Nat Mater 5 (2006) 52-55
3. Thurner P.J., Erickson B., Jungmann R., Schriock Z., Weaver J.C., Fantner G.E., et al. High-speed photography of compressed human trabecular bone correlates whitening to microscopic damage. Engng Frac Mech 74 (2007) 1928-1941
4. Nagaraja S., Couse T.L., and Guldberg R.E. Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. J Biomech 38 4 (2005) 707-716
5. Cook R, Zioupos P. The fracture toughness of cancellous bone. J Biomech 2006;39:S17.
6. Fujisaki K., and Tadano S. Relationship between bone tissue strain and lattice strain of HAp crystals in bovine cortical bone under tensile loading. J Biomech 40 (2007) 1832-1838
7. Van Rietbergen B, Eckstein F, Koller B, Huiskes R, Baaijens F, Ruegsegger P. Trabecular bone tissue strains in the healthy and osteoporotic human femur. In: Transactions of the orthopaedic research society, Orlando; 2000.
8. Bayraktar H.H., Gupta A., Kwon R.Y., Papadopoulos P., and Keaveny T.M. The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone. J Biomech Engng 126 6 (2004) 677-684
9. Tomar V. Modeling of dynamic fracture and damage in 2-dimensional trabecular bone microstructures using the cohesive finite element method. J Biomech Engng 130 2 (2008) 021021
10. Cody D.D., Gross G.J., Hou F.J., Spencer H.J., Goldstein S.A., and Fyhrie D.P. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32 10 (1999) 1013-1020
11. Keyak J.H. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Engng Phys 23 (2001) 165-173
12. Crawford R.P., Cann C.E., and Keaveny T.M. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 33 4 (2003) 744-750
13. Van Rietbergen B., Odgaard A., Kabel J., and Huiskes R. Relationships between bone morphology and bone elastic properties can be accurately quantified using high-resolution computer reconstructions. J Orthopaed Res 16 1 (1998) 23-28
14. Odgaard A., Kabel J., Van Rietbergen B., Dalstra M., and Huiskes R. Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related. J Biomech 30 5 (1997) 487-495
15. Stolken J.S., and Kinney J.H. On the importance of geometric nonlinearity in finite-element simulations of trabecular bone failure. Bone 33 4 (2003) 494-504
16. Bayraktar H.H., Morgan E.F., Niebur G.L., Morris G.E., Wong E.K., and Keaveny T.M. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 37 1 (2004) 27-35
17. Xu X.P., and Needleman A. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42 (1994) 1397-1434
18. Camacho G.T., and Ortiz M. Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33 20-22 (1996) 2899-2938
19. Tomar V., and Zhou M. Deterministic and stochastic analyses of dynamic fracture in two-phase ceramic microstructures with random material properties. Engng Fract Mech 72 (2005) 1920-1941
20. Ural A., and Vashishth D. Cohesive finite element modeling of age-related toughness loss in human cortical bone. J Biomech 39 16 (2006) 2974-2982
21. Diab T., and Vashishth D. Effects of fatigue microdamage on local bone tissue properties. Summer bioengineering conference (2005), ASME, Vail (CO)
22. Mota A., Klug W.S., Ortiz M., and Pandolfie A. Finite-element simulation of firearm injury to the human cranium. Comput Mech 31 (2003) 115-121
23. Parkkari J., Kannus P., Palvanen M., Natri A., Vainio J., Aho H., et al. Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calc Tiss Int 65 (1999) 183-187
24. Dubey D.K., and Tomar V. Microstructure dependent dynamic fracture analyses of trabecular bone based on nascent bone atomistic simulations. Mech Res Commun 35 1-2 (2008) 24-31 Special Issue on Multiscale Modeling
25. Ural A., and Vashishth D. Anisotropy of age-related toughness loss in human cortical bone: a finite element study. J Biomech 40 (2007) 1606-1614
26. Pandolfi A, Yu C, Corigliano A, Ortiz M. Modeling dynamic fracture in transversely isotropic composites: a cohesive approach. Technical Report, California Institute of Technology; 2000.
27. Tomar V., Zhai J., and Zhou M. Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model. Int J Numer Meth Engng 61 (2004) 1894-1920
28. Niebur G.L., Yuen J.C., Hsia A.C., and Keaveny T.M. Convergence behavior of high-resolution finite element models of trabecular bone. J Biomech Engng 121 6 (1999) 629-635
29. Kabel J., Van Rietbergen B., Dalstra M., Odgaard A., and Huiskes R. The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone. J Biomech 32 7 (1999) 673-680
30. Bayraktar H.H., Morgan E.F., Niebur G.L., Morris G.E., Wong E.K., and Keaveny T.M. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 37 (2004) 27-35
31. Currey J.D. Bones: structure and mechanics. 2nd ed. (2002), University Press, Princeton (NJ)
32. Knets I.V. Mechanics of biological tissues. A review. Polym Mechan 13 (1978) 434-440
33. Shahar R., Zaslansky P., Barak P.M., Friesem A.A., Currey J.D., and Weiner S. Anisotropic Poisson's ratio and compression modulus of cortical bone determined by speckle interferometry. J Biomech 40 (2007) 252-264
34. Anderson T.L. Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications (1994), CRC Press
35. Shet C., and Chandra N. Analysis of energy balance when using cohesive zone models to simulate fracture processes. J Engng Mater Tech 124 (2002) 440-450
36. Tvergaard V., and Hutchinson J.W. The relation between crack growth and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40 (1992) 1377-1397
37. Minnaar K. Experimental and numerical analysis of damage in laminate composites under low velocity impact loading. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta (GA); 2002.
38. Tvergaard V. Cohesive zone representations of failure between elastic or rigid and ductile solids. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1859-1868
39. Camacho G.T., and Ortiz M. Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33 (1996) 2899-2938
40. Cornec A., Scheider I., and Schwalbe K.-H. On the practical application of the cohesive zone model. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1963-1987
41. Sorensen B.F., and Jacobsen T.K. Determination of cohesive laws by the J integral approach. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1841-1858
42. Espinosa H.D., Dwivedi S., and Lu H.-C. Modeling impact induced delamination of woven fiber reinforced composites with contact/cohesive laws. Comput Meth Appl Mechan Engng 183 (2000) 259-290
43. Reilly D.T., and Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8 (1975) 393-405
44. Brown C.U., Yener Y., and Norman T.L. Fracture toughness is dependent on bone location-a study of femoral neck, femoral shaft, and the tibial shaft. J Biomed Mater Res 49 (2000) 380-389
45. Burstein A.H., Reilly D.T., and Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg 58A (1976) 82-86
46. McCalden R.W., McGeough J.A., Barker M.B., and Court-Brown C.M. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg 75A (1993) 1193-1205
47. Krieg R.D., and Key S.W. Transient shell response by numerical integration. Int J Numer Meth Engng 7 (1973) 273-286
48. Belytschko T., Chiapetta R.L., and Bartel H.D. Efficient large scale non-linear transient analysis by finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Engng 10 (1976) 579-596
49. Zhai J., and Zhou M. Finite element analysis of micromechanical failure modes in heterogeneous brittle solids. Inte J Fract 101 (2000) 161-180 Special Issue on Failure Mode Transition in Solids
50. Thomsen J.S., Ebbesen E.N., and Mosekilde L. Relationships between static histomorphometry and bone strength measurements in human iliac crest bone biopsies. Bone 22 2 (1998) 153-163
51. Tijssens M. On the cohesive surface methodology for fracture of brittle heterogeneous solids (2000), Technical University Delft
52. Scheider I., and Brocks W. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1943-1961
53. Falk M.A., Needleman A., and Rice J.R. A critical evaluation of dynamic fracture simulations using cohesive surfaces. J Phys IV 11 (2001) 43-52
54. Cameron J.R., Skofronick J.G., and Grant R.M. Physics of the body. 2nd ed. (1999), Medical Physics Publishing, Madison (WI) p. 96
55. Keaveny T.M., Morgan E.F., Niebur G.L., and Yeh O.C. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Engng 3 (2001) 307-333
56. Cox B.N., and Yang Q. Cohesive zone models of localization and fracture in bone. Engng Frac Mech 74 (2007) 1079-1092
57. Keaveny T.M., Wachtel E.F., Ford C.M., and Hayes W.C. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech 27 (1994) 1137-1146
58. Morgana E.F., and Keaveny T.M. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34 (2001) 569-577
59. Zioupos P., and Currey J.D. Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone 22 (1998) 57-66
60. Wang X., Shen X., Li X., and Agrawal C.M. Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone. Bone 31 (2002) 1-7
61. Yosibash Z., Padan R., Joskowicz L., and Milgrom C. A CT-Based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. J Biomech Engng 129 (2007) 297-309
62. Pothuaud L., Benhamou C.L., Porion P., Lespessailles E., Harba R., and Levitz P. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 15 4 (2000) 691-700