In situ assembly of a modular noncemented total shoulder prosthesis for the reconstruction of complex joint pathology;In-situ-Montage einer modularen, nichtzementierten Schulterprothese zur Wiederherstellung komplexer Schulteranatomie

Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-50

  Simmen, Beat R ^a   Schwyzer, Hans Kaspar ^a   Flury, Matthias P ^a   Goldhahn, Jörg ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Joint replacement; Modular shoulder prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CERCLAGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULDER DISEASE; SHOULDER FRACTURE; SHOULDER PAIN; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; ARTHROPLASTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INFORMED CONSENT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SHOULDER; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SHOULDER JOINT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64049091337     PISSN: 09346694     EISSN: 14390981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00064-009-1604-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S. Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:391-398.
2. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology (Oxf) 2007;46:87-92.
3. Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: Usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51:819-828.
4. Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:857-865.
5. Boorman RS Kopjar B, Fehrimnger E. The effect of total shoulder arthroplasty on self-assessed health status is comparable to that of total hip arthroplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:158-163.
6. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1998.
7. Cameron B, Galatz L, Williams GR. Factors affecting the outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2001;30:613-623.
8. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-164.
9. Edwards TB, Kadakia NR, Boulahia A. A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:207-213.
10. Goldhahn J, Angst F, Drerup S. Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder form into German. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:248-254.
11. Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:431-441.
12. Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:331-338.
13. Iannotti JP, Williams GR. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Factors influencing prosthetic design. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:377-391.
14. Mileti J, Sperling JW, Cofiel RH. Monoblock and modular total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:496-500.
15. Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 2002;29:401-402.
16. Pearl ML, Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:660-671.
17. Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: Relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1594-1602.
18. Simmen BR, Angst F, Schwyzer HK. A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:113-118.
19. Walch G, Boileau P. Prosthetic adaptability: A new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:443-451.