The dynamic effects of open-space conservation policies on residential development density

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 239-252

  Lewis, David J ^a   Provencher, Bill ^a   Butsic, Van ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Development density; Land use change; Maximum simulated likelihood; Open space; Shoreline development; Spatial modeling; Zoning

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT DENSITY; LAND-USE CHANGE; MAXIMUM SIMULATED LIKELIHOOD; OPEN SPACE; SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL MODELING;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LAND USE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; ZONING;

FORESTRY;

DATA SET; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GROWTH RATE; LAND USE CHANGE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; NATURE CONSERVATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SHORELINE; ZONING;

EID: 64049088412     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ai C., and Norton E.C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80 (2003) 123-129
2. Armsworth P.R., Dailey G.C., Kareiva P., and Sanchirico J.N. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 14 (2006) 5403-5408
3. Anselin L. Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 27 (2002) 247-267
4. Bockstael N.E. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1996) 1168-1180
5. Boyle K.J., Poor P.J., and Taylor L.O. Estimating the demand for protecting freshwater lakes from eutrophication. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 5 (1999) 1118-1122
6. Brock W., and Durlauf S. Discrete-choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies 68 (2001) 235-260
7. Cameron A.C., and Trivedi P.K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Capozza D., and Helsley R. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth. Journal of Urban Economics 26 (1989) 295-306
9. Carrion-Flores C., and Irwin E.G. Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 4 (2004) 889-904
10. Christensen D.L., Herwig B.R., Schindler D.E., and Carpenter S.R. Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in north temperate lakes. Ecological Applications 6 4 (1996) 1143-1149
11. In: Flader S.L. (Ed). The Great Lakes Forest, an Environmental and Social History (1983), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
12. Greene W. Econometric Analysis. fourth ed. (2000), Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, NY
13. W. Greene, A general approach for incorporating selectivity in a model, Working Paper, Department of Economics, New York University, 2006.
14. Hrabik T.R., and Magnuson J.J. Simulated dispersal of exotic rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in a northern Wisconsin Lake district and implications for management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56 (1999) 35-42
15. Irwin E., and Bockstael N.E. Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2 (2002) 331-354
16. Irwin E.G., and Bockstael N.E. Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 (2004) 705-725
17. Lewis D.J., Hunt G.L., and Plantinga A.J. Public conservation land and employment growth in the northern forest region. Land Economics 78 2 (2002) 245-259
18. Lewis D.J., and Plantinga A.J. Policies for habitat fragmentation: combining econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Economics 83 2 (2007) 109-127
19. Lindsay A.R., Gillum S.S., and Meyer M.W. Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest. Biological Conservation 107 (2002) 1-11
20. McConnell V., Walls M., and Kopits E. Zoning, TDRs, and the density of development. Journal of Urban Economics 59 (2006) 440-457
21. Mundlak Y. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46 (1978) 69-85
22. Newburn D.A., and Berck P. Modeling suburban and rural-residential development beyond the urban fringe. Land Economics 82 4 (2006) 481-499
23. Schindler D.W. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnology and Oceanography 51 1 (2006) 356-363
24. Schindler D.E., Geib S.I., and Williams M.R. Patterns of fish growth along a residential development gradient in north temperate lakes. Ecosystems 3 3 (2000) 229-237
25. Schnaiberg J., Riera J., Turner M.G., and Volss P.R. Explaining human settlement patterns in a Recreational Lake district: Vilas county, Wisconsin, USA. Environmental Management 30 1 (2002) 24-34
26. Spalatro F., and Provencher B. An analysis of minimum frontage zoning to preserve lakefront amenities. Land Economics 77 4 (2001) 469-481
27. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Turner M.A. Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development. Journal of Urban Economics 57 1 (2005) 19-54
29. Walsh R. Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics 61 (2007) 319-344
30. Woodford J.E., and Meyer M.W. Impact of lakeshore development on green frog abundance. Biological Conservation 110 (2003) 277-284
31. Wu J., and Plantinga A.J. Open space policies and urban spatial structure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 2 (2003) 288-309
32. Zabel J.E. Estimating fixed and random effects models with selectivity. Economics Letters 40 (1992) 269-272