The impact of an electronic reminder on the use of alarms after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1203-1208

  Eden, Arieh ^a,d   Pizov, Reuven ^a   Toderis, Liat ^b   Kantor, Gareth ^c   Perel, Azriel ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^d Heart Failure Center   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM MONITOR; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PATIENT MONITORING; REMINDER SYSTEM; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PULSATILE FLOW; REMINDER SYSTEMS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 63849309946     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181984ef9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38
2. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765
3. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:135-42
4. Kheterpal S, Gupta R, Blum JM, Tremper KK, O'Reilly M, Kazanjian PE. Electronic reminders improve procedure documentation compliance and professional fee reimbursement. Anesth Analg 2007;104:592-7
5. Wax D, Beilin Y, Levin M, Chadha N, Krol M, Reich DL. The effect of an interactive visual reminder in an anesthesia information management system on timeliness of prophylactic antibiotic administration. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1462-6
6. O'Reilly M, Talsma A, VanRiper S, Kheterpal S, Burney R. An anesthesia information system designed to provide physicianspecific feedback improves timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics. Anesth Analg 2006;103:908-12
7. Reich DL, Kahn RA, Wax D, Palvia T, Galati M, Krol M. Development of a module for point-of-care charge capture and submission using an anesthesia information management system. Anesthesiology 2006;105:179-86
8. Beatty PC, Beatty SF. Anaesthetists' intentions to violate safety guidelines. Anaesthesia 2004;59:528-40
9. Turn Your Alarms On. Available at http://www.apsf.org/resource-center/ newsletter/2004/winter/03turn-on.htm. Accessed on April 19, 2005
10. Asbury AJ, Rolly G. Theatre monitor alarm settings: a pilot survey in Scotland and Belgium. Anaesthesia 1999;54:176-80
11. Seagull F, Sanderson P. Anesthesia alarms in context: an observational study. Hum Factors 2001;43:66-78
12. Eden A, Grach M, Goldik Z, Shnaider I, Lazarovici H, Barnett- Griness O, Perel A, Pizov R. The implementation of an anesthesia information management system. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:882-9
13. Rood E, Bosman R, van der Spoel J, Taylor P, Zandstra D. Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:172-80
14. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/ 06-npsg-dsc.htm. Accessed on 2006
15. Vigoda M, Lubarsky D. Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1798-802
16. Goldman JM, Schrenker R, Jackson JL, Whitehead S. Plug-andplay in the operating room of the future. Biomed Instrum Technol 2005;39:194-9