Stetistics, damned stetistics and time to intervene

Gut

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 608-609

  Scott, N A ^a   Sagar, P ^b  

^a ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANUS SPHINCTER; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLOSTOMY; FECES INCONTINENCE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LETTER; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TUMOR VOLUME; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE; RECTUM TUMOR; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENGLAND; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 63849284158     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.166884     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. BBC website.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/ 7435277.stm (accessed 17 November 2008)
2. Pachler J, Wille-J0rgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane detabase of systemetic reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004323. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD004323.pub3 http://14651858.CD004323.pub3.
3. Health Informetics Unit. The iLab project evaluetion report. Annex D: Quality of HES deta issues addressed by the Royal College of Physicians iLab. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2006.
4. Garout M, Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, et al. Comparison of administretive deta with the Associetion of Coloproctology of Greet Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer detabase. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:155-63.