A judicial presentation of evidence of a student culture of "dealing"

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 421-441

  Wood, Nathan B ^a   Lawrenz, Frances ^b   Haroldson, Rachelle ^c  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Fridley High School   (United States)

Author keywords

Judicial methodology; Legal argumentation; Reform; Science education; Student culture

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL POLICIES; JUDICIAL METHODOLOGY; LEGAL ARGUMENTATION; REFORM; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; SCIENCE EDUCATION; UNDERLYING CAUSE;

SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 63849280960     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20272     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aikenhead, G.S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Aikenhead, G.S. (2002). Cross-cultural science teaching: "Rekindling Traditions" for aboriginal students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2, 287-304.
3. Aikenhead, G.S. (2001). Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180-188.
4. Aikenhead, G., Calabrese, A., & Chinn, P. (2006). FORUM: Toward a politics of place-based science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 403-416.
5. Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539-620.
6. Alpert, B. (1991). Students resistance in the classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22(4), 350-366.
7. Barton, A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
8. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
9. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, & R.R. Cocking (Eds.), (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and School. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
10. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for construedvist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
11. Brown, B .A. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834.
12. Carlone, H.B. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of "achievement". Science Education, 87, 307-328.
13. Carlone, H.B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392-414.
14. Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, L. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th edition) London: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
16. Corbet, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students: A plea to researchers and reformers. Educational Researcher, 24(5), 12-17.
17. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Delpit, L. (1988). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New York Press.
19. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
20. Donigan, R.L., Fisher, E.C., Reeder, R.H., & Williams, R.N. (1975). The Evidence Handbook. Evanston, IL: The Traffic Institute.
21. Elmore, R., & McLaughlin, M. (1983). The federal role in education: Learning from experience. Education and Urban Society, 15, 309-330.
22. Ellwood, CA. (1914). Our compulsory education laws, and retardation and elimination in our public schools. Education, 34, 572-576.
23. Federal Rules of Evidence. (2008). Legal Information Institute, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY. Updated version accessible at http://www.law.cornell. edu/rules/fre.
24. Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen, B.R. (2003). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. (3rd edition) Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc.
25. Floc'hloy, B., & Plottu, E. (1998). Democratic evaluation: From empowerment evaluation to public decision-making. Evaluation, 4, 261-277.
26. Freebury, G., & Eisenkraft, A. (2006). Active chemistry. New York: It's About Time Inc.
27. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
28. Fullan, M.G., & Miles, M.B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 744-752.
29. Hewson, P.W., Kahle, J., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1130-1144.
30. Huffman, D., & Lawrenz, F. (2003). The impact of a state systemic initiative an U.S. science teachers and students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 357-377.
31. Hughes, E.C., Becker, H.S., & Geer, B. (1962). Student culture and academic effort. In: N. Sanford (Ed.), The American College (pp. 515-530). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32. Jordan, C. (1995). Creating cultures of schooling: Historical and conceptual background of the KEEP/ Rough Rock collaboration. Bilingual Research Journal, 19, 83-100.
33. Kliebard, H.M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. (2nd edition) New York: Routledge.
34. Kilner, C. (Director) (2003). How to deal [Motion picture]. United States: New Line Home Video.
35. Kuh, G.D., & Whitt, E.J. (1988) The invisible tapestry. Culture in American colleges and universities (Report No.l) Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED299934).
36. Lawrenz, F., Keiser, N., & Lavoie, B. (2003). Sustaining innovation in technological education. Community College Review, 30,47-63.
37. Marzano, R., & Pickering, D. (1997). Dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
38. McLaughlin, M. (1975). Evaluation and reform: The elementary and secondary education act of 1965, Title I. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
39. McQuillan, RJ. (2005). Possibilities and pitfalls: A comparative analysis of student empowerment. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 639-670.
40. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
41. Nathan, R. (2005). My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
42. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
43. Neumann, R.H. Jr. (1998). Legal reasoning and legal writing: Structure, strategy, and style. (3rd edition) Aspen Publishers Inc. New York.
44. Newmann, E, Associates. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 41-74.
45. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. H.R.1, 107th Cong., 1st Sess., 147 Cong. Rec. H2396-H2446 (2001).
46. Rodriguez, A.J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's national science education standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 19-37.
47. Rodriguez, A.J. (2001). From gap gazing to promising cases: Moving toward equity in urban education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1115-1129.
48. Schneider, B., Brief, A., & Guzzo, R. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 7-19.
49. Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. (1993). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the "standard" direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1000-1014.
51. Seiler, G., Tobin, K., & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology, and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 746-767.
52. Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 114-127.
53. Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L.D., & Anderson, J.O. (2004). Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 771-790.
54. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Tate, W. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1015-1028.
56. Tharp, R.G. (1982). The effective instruction of comprehension: Results and description of the Kamehameha Early Education Program. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 503-527.
57. Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (1996). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of US Science and Mathematics Education. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
58. Tobin, K. (2006). Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning science in urban high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 219-252.
59. Tobin, K., Roth, W.-M., & Zimmerman, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941-964.
60. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Before It's Too Late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education.
61. Weiss, I.R., Banilower, E.R., McMahon, K.C., & Smith, P.S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
62. Van Maanen, J. (1987). Managing education better: Some thoughts on management of student cultures in American colleges and universities. Paper Presented the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Kansas City, MO.
63. Wood, N.B., Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Viewing the school environment through multiple lenses: In search of school-level variables tied to student achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 237-254.