A distributed patient identification protocol based on control numbers with semantic annotation

International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 24-43

  Eichelberg, Marco ^a   Aden, Thomas ^a   Thoben, Wilfried ^a  

^a OFFIS ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Health care communications; Medical record confidentiality

Indexed keywords

CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ELECTRONIC HEALTHCARE; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT; UNIQUE PATIENT IDENTIFIERS;

HEALTH CARE; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

EID: 63849252730     PISSN: 15526283     EISSN: 15526291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2005100102     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aden, T., Eichelberg, M., & Thoben, W. (2004). A fault-tolerant cryptographic protocol for patient record requests. In Proceedings of EuroPACS-MIR 2004 in the Enlarged Europe (pp. 103-106). Trieste, Italy: E.U.T. Edizioni Università di Trieste.
2. ARTEMIS Consortium. (2004). The ARTEMIS Project. Retrieved from http://www.srdc.metu.edu.tr/webpage/projects/artemis/
3. Blakely, T., & Salmond, C. (2002). Probabilistic record linkage and a method to calculate the positive predictive value. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 1246-1252.
4. CEN/ISSS eHealth Standardization Focus Group. (2004). Current and future standardization issues in the e-Health domain: Achieving interoperability (Draft 4.1). Geneva, Switzerland: European Committee for Standardization/Information Society Standardization System.
5. Council of Europe. (1997). Recommendation No. R(97)5 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the protection of medical data (Tech. Rep.). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
6. Council of the European Communities. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Communities, L281, 31-39.
7. Dean, M., & Schreiber, G. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference (W3C Recommendation). Cambridge, MA: World Wide Web Consortium.
8. Dietzel, G., & Riepe, C. (2004). Modernizing health care in Germany by introducing the eHealthcard. Swiss Medical Informatics, 52, 18-22.
9. Dogac, A., et al. (in press a). Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies.
10. Dogac, A., et al. (in press b). Artemis: Deploying semantically enriched Web Services in the healthcare domain. Information Systems Journal.
11. Eichelberg, M., Aden, T., & Riesmeier, J. (2004). Relevant electronic healthcare record standards and protocols for accessing medical information (ARTEMIS deliverable D5.1.1). Oldenburg, Germany: ARTEMIS Consortium.
12. Eichelberg, M., Poiseau, E., Wein, B. B., & Riesmeier, J. (2003). IHE Europe: Extending the IHE initiative to the European health care market. In H. K. Huang, & O. M. Ratib (Eds.), Medical imaging 2003: PACS and integrated medical information systems: Design and evaluation (Vol. 5033) (pp. 1-10).
13. Gong, L. (2002). Project JXTA: A technology overview (Tech. Rep.). Palo Alto, CA.: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
14. HL7. (2003). Application protocol for electronic data exchange in health care environments (Version 2.5) (ANSI Standard). Ann Arbor, MI: Health Level Seven.
15. IHE. (2004). IT infrastructure technical framework revision 1.1 (Tech. Rep.). Oak Brook, IL: Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise.
16. ISO. (1999a). Information processing: 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets. Part 13: Latin alphabet No. 9 (International Standard No. 8859-13). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
17. ISO. (1999b). Information processing: 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets. Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1 (International Standard No. 8859-1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
18. Jaro, M. A. (1989). Advances in record linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(406), 414-420.
19. Krieg, V., Hense, H.-W., Lehnert, M., & Mattauch, V. (2001). Record linage mit kyptographierten Identitätsdaten in einem bevö lkerungsbezogenen Krebsregister. Gesundheitswesen, 63, 376-382.
20. NEMA. (2004). Digital imaging and Communications in medicine (DICOM) (NEMA Standards Publication No. PS 3.x-2004). Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
21. Postel, H.-J. (1969). Die Kölner Phonetik - Ein Verfahren zur Identifizierung von Personennamen auf der Grundlage der Gestaltanalyse. IBM-Nachrichten, 19, 925-931.
22. Thoben, W., Appelrath, H.-J., & Sauer, S. (1994). Record linkage of anonymous data by control numbers. In W. Gaul, & D. Pfeifer (Eds.), From data to knowledge: Theoretical and practical aspects of classification, data analysis and knowledge organisation, Oldenburg (pp. 412-419). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
23. Winkler, W. E. (1999). The state of record linkage and current research problems (Tech. Note). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.