Use of microsimulation to model day-to-day variability of intersection performance

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2088, 2008, Pages 18-25

  Abdy, Zeeshan R ^a   Hellinga, Bruce R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITION; DAY-TO-DAY VARIABILITY; INTERSECTION DELAYS; MICROSIMULATION; MICROSIMULATION MODELING; PERFORMANCE; PSEUDO-RANDOM NUMBERS; STANDARD DEVIATION; TRAFFIC DEMANDS; TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING;

EID: 63849239544     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2088-03     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Shaaban, K., and E. Radwan. Calibration and Validation Procedure for Microscopic Simulation Model: Case Study of SimTraffic for Arterial Streets. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2. Chu, L., H. X. Liu, J.-S. Oh, and W. W. Recker. Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
3. Ngan, V., T. Sayed, and A. Abdelfatah. Impacts of Various Parameters on Transit Signal Priority Effectiveness. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2004, pp. 71-93.
4. Dion, F., and H. Rakha. Integration of Transit Signal Priority within Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Systems. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
5. Garrow, M., and R. Machemehl. Development and Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority Strategies. Southwestern Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, 1997.
6. Hellinga, B., and Z. Abdy. Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak-Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
7. Smith, M. C., and A. W. Sadek. Challenges Calibrating Large-Scale Microscopic Simulation Model of Diverse Urban, Suburban, and Rural Network: Practical Guide. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
8. Birst, S., J. Baker, and K. Shouman. Comparison of Traffic Simulation Models with HCM 2000 Methodology Using Various Traffic Levels Under Pretimed Signal Control. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
9. Levinson, H. S., D. Sullivan, and R. W. Bryson. Effects of Urban Traffic Volume Variations on Service Levels. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
10. Teply, S., and G. D. Evans. Evaluation of the Quality of Signal Progression by Delay Distributions. In Transportation Research Record 1225, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 1-7.
11. Teply, S. Accuracy of Delay Surveys at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1225, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 24-32.
12. Colyar, J. D., and N. M. Rouphail. Measured Distributions of Control Delay on Signalized Arterials. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1852, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1-9.