Declarative deponency: A network morphology account of morphological mismatches

Proceedings of the British Academy

Volumn 145, Issue , 2007, Pages 145-173

  Hippisley, Andrew ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849203845     PISSN: 00681202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aronoff, Mark. 1992. Stems in Latin verbal morphology. Morphology now, ed. by Mark Aronoff, 5-32. New York: SUNY
2. -1994. Morphology by itself: steins and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
3. Baerman, Matthew. 2006a. Latin deponency language report. [Available at www.smg. surrey.ac.uk/deponency/Examples/Latin.htm]
4. -2006b. Archi deponency language report [Available at www.smg.surrey.ac.uk /deponency/Examples/Archi.htm]
5. - This volume. Morphological typology of deponency
6. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown, and Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: a study of syncretism. Cambridge: CUP
7. Brown, Dunstan. 1998. Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb. Models of inflection, ed. by Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann, and Teresa Parodi, 196-221. Niemeyer: Tübingen
8. Cahill, Lynn, and Gerald Gazdar. 1999. German noun inflection. Journal of Linguistics 35.1-42
9. Corbett, Greville G. This volume. Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between
10. Corbett, Greville G., and Norman Fraser. 1993. Network Morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29.113-42
11. Ernout Alfred, and Francois Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe latine (2nd edn). Paris: Klincksieck
12. Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown, and Greville G. Corbett. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism. Yearbook of Morphology 2000, ed. by Jaap van Marie and Geert Booij, 187-231. Dordrecht: Kluwer
13. Evans, Roger, and Gerald Gazdar. 1996. DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.167-216
14. Flobert Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Société d'Édition 'Les Belles Lettres'
15. Hippisley Andrew. 1998. Indexed stems and Russian word formation: a Network Morphology account of Russian personal nouns. Linguistics 36.1039-1124
16. -2001. Word Formation Rules in a default inheritance framework: a Network Account of Russian personal nouns. Yearbook of Morphology 1999, ed. by Jaap van Marie and Geert Booij, 221-61. Dordrecht: Kluwer
17. -2006a. A formal account of Latin deponent verbs. [Available at www.smg.surrey. ac.uk/deponency/DATR-analyses/Archi/Latin-report.pdf]
18. -2006b. A formal account of Archi deponent nouns. [Available at www.smg. surrey.ac.uk/deponency/DATR-analyses/Archi/Archi-report.pdf]
19. 2004. Suppletion: frequency, categories and distribution of stems. Studies in Language 28.389-421
20. Kennedy, Benjamin. 1962. Revised Latin primer (edited and further revised by J. Mountford). Harlow: Longman
21. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1977a. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka: II: taksonomičeskaja grammatika. (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 12). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta
22. -1977b. Arčinskij jazyk: teksty i slovar'. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta
23. Kühner, Raphael. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache (part 2, 1, revised by Andreas Thierfelder). Hamburg: Hahn
24. Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: CUP