Interrater reliability of the personal care participation assessment and resource tool (PC-PART) in a rehabilitation setting

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 132-139

  Turner, Christopher ^a   Fricke, Janet ^a,c   Darzins, Peteris ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Department of Health Sciences 3 ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Functional assessment; ICF; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CANADA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VICTORIA;

EID: 63849176096     PISSN: 00450766     EISSN: 14401630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00750.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barbara, A. & Whiteford, G. (2005). Clinical utility of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool: An investigation of its use with the aged people in hospital. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 17-25.
2. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) (2002). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (3rd ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
3. Cicchetti, D. V. & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551-558.
4. Darzins, P. (2003). The Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART) and the ICF. In: AIHW (Ed.) ICF Australian user guide (Vol. 1.0, pp. 1-3). Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
5. Darzins, P. (2004). Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool. Melbourne: Darzins Group.
6. Darzins, P., Edwards, M., Lowe, S., McEvoy, E. & Vertesi, A. (1997). Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART): User's manual. Ontario: The HART Group.
7. Department of Health and Ageing (2003). A new strategy for community care: Consultation paper. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing.
8. Donnelly, C. & Carswell, A. (2002). Individualized outcome measures: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 84-93.
9. Duckett, S. J. (2004). The Australian health care system (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.
10. Feinstein, A. R. & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543-549.
11. Fricke, J., Unsworth, C. & Worrell, D. (1992). Reliability of the Functional Independence Measure with occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 40, 7-15.
12. Haglund, L. & Henriksson, C. (2003). Concepts in occupational therapy in relation to the ICF. Occupational Therapy International, 10, 253-268.
13. Hayes, R. L. (2000). Evidence-based occupational therapy needs strategically-targeted quality research now. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47, 186-190.
14. Herbert, R., Carrier, R. & Bilodeau, A. (1988). The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Ageing, 17, 293-302.
15. Kundel, H. L. & Polansky, M. (2003). Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology, 228, 303-308.
16. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
17. Law, M. (1987). Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 133-138.
18. Law, M. & Baum, C. (2001). Measurement in occupational therapy. In: M. Law, C. Baum & W. Dunn (Eds.) Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy (pp. 3-19). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
19. Law, M., Dunn, W. & Baum, C. (2005). Measuring participation. In: M. Law, C. Baum & W. Dunn (Eds.) Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy (pp. 107-126). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
20. Mahoney, F. I. & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
21. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (Vol. 2nd). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1997). Methodological issues in measurement of functional status and rehabilitation outcomes. In: S. S. Dittmar & G. E. Gresham (Eds.) Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional (pp. 17-26). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
23. Portney, L. G. & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (Vol. 2). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
24. Post, M. W. & de Witte, L. P. (2003). Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 548-552.
25. Taylor, J., Clarnette, R. & Darzins, P. (1998). Reliability of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART) in an aged care department. Paper presented at the Australian Society for Geriatric Medicine Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 11-12 May 1998.
26. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR) (1999). UDSMR Adult FIM™ workshop - Participant manual, Version 5.0 (Australia). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo.
27. Vertesi, A., Darzins, P., Lowe, S., McEvoy, E. & Edwards, M. (2000). Development of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART). Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 120-127.
28. Viera, A. J. & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37, 360-363.
29. Whiteneck, G. G., Charlifue, M. A., Gerhart, K. A., Overholser, J. D. & Richardson, G. N. (1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519-526.
30. Williams, J. H., Drinka, T. J. K., Greenberg, J. R., Farrell-Holtan, J., Euhardy, R. & Schram, M. (1991). Development and testing of the Assessment of Living Skills and Resources (ALSAR) in elderly community-dwelling veterans. The Gerontologist, 31, 84-91.
31. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
32. World Health Organization (2003). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems: 10th revision. Retrieved 30 June 2005, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/.