Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-hosts during host selection by woodboring insects

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 553-563

  Campbell, Stuart A ^a,b   Borden, John H ^a,c  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c Pherotech International Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAIT; BEETLE; CONIFEROUS TREE; GENERALIST; HERBIVORE; HOST LOCATION; HOST PLANT; HOST PREFERENCE; HOST SELECTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; KAIROMONE; OLFACTORY CUE; PHEROMONE TRAP; WASP;

AMBROSIA; BETULA; COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; HEXAPODA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PLATYPODINI; POPULUS; TRYPODENDRON LINEATUM;

EID: 63849135043     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.16761.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allison, J. D. et al. 2001. Kairomonal response by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones J. Chem. Ecol. 27 : 633 646.
2. Allison, J. D. et al. 2004. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) Chemoecology 14 : 123 150.
3. Aluja, M. Prokopy, R. J. 1993. Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella flies J. Chem. Ecol. 19 : 2671 2696.
4. Beaver, R. A. 1989. Insect-fungus relationships in the bark and ambrosia beetles Collins, N. M. Insect-fungus interactions. Academic Press 121 143.
5. Bernays, E. A. Chapman, R. F. 1993. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall Ltd.
6. Björklund, N. et al. 2005. Olfactory and visual stimuli used in orientation to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Physiol. Entomol. 30 : 225 231.
7. Borden, J. H. et al. 1976. Gnathotrichus sulcatus: synergistic response to enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone sulcatol Science 192 : 894 896.
8. Borden, J. H. et al. 1979. Synthesis and field testing of 4,6,6-lineatin, the aggregation pheromone of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) J. Chem. Ecol. 5 : 681 689.
9. Borden, J. H. et al. 1980. Ethanol and α-pinene as synergists for the aggregation pheromones of two Gnathotrichus species Can. J. For. Res. 10 : 290 292.
10. Borden, J. H. et al. 1982. Variation in the response of Trypodendron lineatum from two continents to semiochemicals and trap form Environ. Entomol. 11 : 403 408.
11. Borden, J. H. et al. 1997. Responses to green leaf volatiles in two biogeoclimatic zones by striped ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 : 2479 2491.
12. Bright, D. E. J. 1983. The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 2. The bark beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), 2nd ed. Can. Dept Agric., Publ. 1576.
13. Butkewich, S. L. Prokopy, R. J. 1997. Attraction of adult plum curculios (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to host-tree odor and visual stimuli in the field J. Entomol. Sci. 32 : 1 6.
14. Campbell, S. A. Borden, J. H. 2005. Bark reflectance spectra of conifers and angiosperms: implications for host discrimination by coniferophagous bark and timber beetles Can. Entomol. 137 : 719 722.
15. Campbell, S. A. Borden, J. H. 2006a. Close-range, in-flight integration of olfactory and visual information by a host-seeking bark beetle Entomol. Exp. Appl. 120 : 91 98.
16. Campbell, S. A. Borden, J. H. 2006b. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Ecol. Entomol. 31 : 437 449.
17. Chiussi, R. Diaz, H. 2002. Orientation of the fiddler crab, Uca cumulanta: responses to chemical and visual cues J. Chem. Ecol. 28 : 1787 1796.
18. Day, R. W. Quinn, G. P. 1989. Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology Ecol. Monogr. 59 : 433 463.
19. Deglow, E. K. Borden, J. H. 1998. Green leaf volatiles disrupt and enhance response to aggregation pheromones by the ambrosia beetle, Gnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Can. J. For. Res. 28 : 1697 1705.
20. Eisner, T. Grant, R. P. 1981. Toxicity, odor aversion, and "olfactory aposematism" Science 213 : 476.
21. Endler, J. A. 1993. The color of light in forests and its implications Ecol. Monogr. 63 : 1 27.
22. Fawcett, T. W. Johnstone, R. A. 2003. Optimal assessment of multiple cues Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270 : 1637 1643.
23. Furniss, M. M. Carolin, V. M. 1977. Western forest insects USDA For. Serv. Misc. Publ. No. 1339.
24. Gara, R. I. et al. 1965. Manipulation of Dendroctonus frontalis by use of a population aggregating pheromone Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 23 : 55 66.
25. Giurfa, M. et al. 1994. Odour and colour information in the foraging choice behaviour of the honeybee J. Comp. Physiol. A 175 : 773 779.
26. Hanks, L. M. 1999. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44 : 483 505.
27. Henneman, M. L. et al. 2002. Response to walnut olfactory and visual cues by the parasitic wasp Diachasmimorpha juglandis. J. Chem. Ecol. 28 : 2221 2244.
28. Huber, D. P. W. Borden, J. H. 2001. Angiosperm bark volatiles disrupt response of Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, to attractant-baited traps J. Chem. Ecol. 27 : 217 233.
29. Huber, D. P. W. et al. 2000. A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagus bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees Chemoecology 10 : 103 113.
30. Jang, E. B. et al. 2000. Flight tunnel responses of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to olfactory and visual stimuli J. Insect. Behav. 13 : 525 538.
31. Johnson, N. E. 1958. Ambrosia beetle infestation of coniferous logs on clearcuttings in northwestern Oregon J. For. 56 : 508 511.
32. Judd, G. J. R. Borden, J. H. 1991. Sensory interaction during trap-finding by female onion flies: implications for ovipositional host-plant finding Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58 : 239 249.
33. Kelsey, R. G. Joseph, G. 1999. Ethanol and ambrosia beetles in Douglas-fir logs exposed or protected from rain J. Chem. Ecol. 25 : 2793 2809.
34. Kerck, K. 1972. Äthylalkohol und Stammkontur als Komponenten der Primäranlockung bei Xyloterus domesticus L. (Col.: Scolytidae) Naturwissenschaften 59 : 423.
35. Kevan, P. G. Baker, H. G. 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28 : 407 453.
36. Kühnholz, S. 2004. Chemical ecology and mechanisms of reproductive isolation in ambrosia beetles PhD thesis Biological sciences. - Simon Fraser Univ.
37. Lindgren, B. S. et al. 1983. Factors influencing the efficiency of pheromone-baited traps for three species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Can. Entomol. 115 : 303 313.
38. Mathieu, F. et al. 1997. Trapping of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. (Col., Scolytidae) within a mesh-enclosed environment: interaction of olfactory and visual stimuli J. Appl. Entomol. 121 : 181 186.
39. Meidinger, D. Pojar, J. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. B.C. Ministry of For. Spec. Rep. Ser. No. 6. Crown Publications Inc. (Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests).
40. Morehead, S. A. Feener, D. H. 2000. Visual and chemical cues used in host location and acceptance by a dipteran parasitoid J. Ins. Behav. 13 : 613 625.
41. Morewood, W. D. et al. 2003. Disruption by conophthorin of the kairomonal response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones J. Chem. Ecol. 29 : 2115 2129.
42. Prokopy, R. J. Owens, E. D. 1978. Visual generalist-visual specialist phytophagous insects: host-selection behaviour and application to management Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24 : 409 420.
43. Prokopy, R. J. Owens, E. D. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28 : 337 364.
44. Pureswaran, D. S. Borden, J. H. 2005. Primary attraction and kairomonal host discrimination in three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Agric. For. Entomol. 7 : 219 230.
45. Pyke, G. H. et al. 1977. Optimal foraging: selective review of theory and tests Q. Rev. Biol. 52 : 137 154.
46. Raffa, K. F. et al. 1993. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles Schowalter, T. O. Filip, G. Interactions among bark beetles, pathogens, and conifers in North American forests. Academic Press 103 128.
47. Raguso, R. A. Willis, M. A. 2005. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim. Behav. 69 : 407 418.
48. Reisenman, C. E. et al. 2000. Interaction of visual and olfactory cues in the aggregation behaviour of the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186 : 961 968.
49. Schoonhoven, L. M. et al. 1998. Insect-plant biology: from physiology to evolution. Chapman and Hall.
50. Schroeder, L. M. 1992. Olfactory recognition of nonhost aspen and birch by conifer bark beetles Tomicus piniperda and Hylurgops palliatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 18 : 1583 1593.
51. Shore, T. L. 1998. Ambrosia beetles Forest Pest Leaflet 72. Can. For. Serv., Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, B.C.
52. Strom, B. L. et al. 1999. Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle Ecol. Appl. 9 : 1028 1038.
53. Strom, B. L. et al. 2001. Visual and olfactory disruption of orientation by the western pine beetle to attractant-baited traps Entomol. Exp. Appl. 100 : 63 67.
54. Strong, D. R. et al. 1984. Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell.
55. Thorsteinson, A. J. 1960. Host selection in phytophagous insects Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5 : 193 218.
56. Todd, J. L. et al. 1990. Interaction between visual and olfactory stimuli during host-finding by leafhopper, Dalbulus maidis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) J. Chem. Ecol. 16 : 2121 2133.
57. Visser, J. H. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31 : 121 144.
58. Vité, J. P. Bakke, A. 1979. Synergism of chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle Naturwissenchaften 66 : 528 529.
59. Wood, D. L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27 : 411 446.
60. Wood, S. L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Nat. Mem. No. 6.
61. Wright, G. A. et al. 2005. Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera) J. Comp. Physiol. A 191 : 105 114.
62. Zhang, Q. H. Schlyter, F. 2004. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles Agric. For. Entomol. 6 : 1 19.