Open quotation revisited

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 443-471

  Recanati, François ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT JEAN NICOD   (France)

^b ARCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849114037     PISSN: 15208583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00153.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Bach, K. 1999: The Myth of Conventional Implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 327-66
2. Bar-Hillel, Y. 1954: Indexical Expressions. Reprinted in his Aspects of Language, Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1970, pp. 69-88
3. Benbaji, Y. 2004: Using Others' Words. Journal of Philosophical Research 29: 93-112
4. Benbaji, Y. 2005: Who Needs Semantics of Quotation Marks? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 27-50
5. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 2005: Varieties of Quotation Revisited. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 51-76
6. - 2007: Language Turned Upon Itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press
7. Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1990: Quotations as Demonstrations. Language, 66: 764-805
8. De Brabanter, P. (ed.) 2005. Hybrid Quotations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
9. (Also published as Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17, 2003)
10. Garcia-Carpintero, M. 2005: Double-Duty Quotation: The Deferred Ostension Account. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 89-108
11. Geurts, B. and Maier, B. 2005: Quotation in Context. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 109-128
12. Gomez-Torrente, M. 2005: Remarks on Impure Quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 129-152
13. Grice, P. 1989: Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
14. King, J. and Stanley, J. 2005: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content. In Z. Sabó (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics, Oxford: Clarenton Press, pp. 111-164
15. Kripke, S. 1977: Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 255-76
16. Levinson, S. 2000: Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
17. Neale, S. 1999: Coloring and Composition. In K. Murasugi and R. Stainton (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics, Boulder: Westview, pp. 35-82
18. Potts, C. 2005: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press
19. - 2007: The Dimensions of Quotation. In C. Barker and P. Jacobson (eds.), Direct Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 405-431
20. Predelli, S. 2003: Scare Quotes and Their Relation to Other Semantic Issues. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 1-28
21. - 2005a: Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
22. - 2005b: 'Subliminale' Messages, Scare Quotes, and the Use Hypothesis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 153-166
23. Recanati, F. 1979: La Transparence et l'Enonciation. Paris: Editions du Seuil
24. - 1997: Can We Believe What We Do Not Understand? Mind and Language 12: 84-100
25. - 1998: Pragmatics. In E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
26. - 2000: Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books
27. - 2001: Open Quotation. Mind 110: 637-687
28. - 2004: Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
29. Reimer, M. 2005: Too Counter-Intuitive to Believe? Pragmatic Accounts of Mixed Quotation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 167-86
30. Saka, P. 2005: Quotational Constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 187-212
31. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson 1981: Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 295-318
32. - 1986: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell