How NOT to review a paper the tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer

SIGMOD Record

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 100-104

  Cormode, Graham ^a  

^a AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES;

COMPUTERS;

PAPER;

COMPUTERS; ETHICS; PAPER INDUSTRY; REVIEW;

EID: 63749131058     PISSN: 01635808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1519103.1519122     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Mark Allman. A referee's plea. http://www.icir.org/mallman/plea. txt, 2001.
2. Mark Allman. Thoughts on reviewing. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (CCR). 38(2), April 2008.
3. Joshua S. Gans and George B. Shepherd. How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 165-179, 1994.
4. Anthony Jay and Jonathan Lynn. The Complete 'Yes Minister'. BBC Books. 1984.
5. Frank Manola. How to get even with database conferece program committees. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. 4(1):30-36, September 1981.
6. Ian Parberry. A guide for new referees in theoretical computer science. Information and Computation, 112(1):96-116, 1994.
7. Timothy Roscoe. Writing reviews for systems conferences. http://people.inf.ethz.ch/troscoe/pubs/review-writing.pdf, 2007.
8. Simone Santini. We are sorry to inform you... Computer, 38(12): 128-127, 2005.
9. Simon Singh. Fermat's Last Theorem. Fourth Estate, 1997.
10. Alan Jay Smith. The task of the referee. IEEE Computer, 23(4):65-71, 1990.
11. Mary-Claire van Leunen and Richard Liption. How to have your abstract rejected. SIGACT News. 8(3):21-24, 1976.
12. Toby Walsh. How to write a review. http://www.labunix.uqam.ca/~jpmf/int- mgmt/walsh1.pdf, 2001.