The Ability of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire to Predict Sick Leave in Patients With Acute Neck Pain

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 178-183

  Vos, Cees J ^a   Verhagen, Arianne P ^a   Koes, Bart W ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Neck Pain; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Sick leave

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ACUTE LOW BACK PAIN SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; NECK PAIN; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICK LEAVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 63749120036     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Borghouts J., Koes B.W., and Bouter L.M. The clinical course of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain 77 (1998) 1-13
2. Cote P., Cassidy J.D., and Caroll L. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey; the prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 23 (1998) 1689-1698
3. Ariëns G., Borghouts J., and Koes B.W. Neck pain. In: Crombie I.K. (Ed). The Epidemiology of Pain (1999), IASP Press, Seattle (Wash) 235-255
4. Mäkelä M., Heliovaara M., Sievers K., Impivaara M., Knekt P., and Aromaa A. Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic neck pain in Finland. Am J Epidemiology 134 (1991) 1356-1367
5. Andersson H.I., Ejlertsson G., Leden I., and Rosenberg C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of difference in age, gender. social class and pain localization. Clin J Pain 9 (1993) 174-182
6. Guez M., Hildingsson C., Nilsson M., and Toolanen G. The prevalence of neck pain. A population based study from Northern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 73 (2002) 455-459
7. Burdorf A., Naaktgeboren B., and Post W. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers. Occup Environ Med 55 (1998) 490-495
8. Linton S.J. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25 (2000) 1148-1156
9. Linton S.J., and Halldèn B.A. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 14 (1998) 209-215
10. Pietrobon R., Coeytaux R.R., Carey T.S., and Richardson W.J. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain and dysfunction. A systematic review. Spine 27 (2002) 515-522
11. Linton S.J., and Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the O{double acute}rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J of Pain 19 (2003) 80-86
12. Merskey H., and Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. 2nd ed. (1994), Seattle IASP press
13. Hurley D.A., Dusoir T.E., McDonough S.M., Moore A.P., Linton S.J., and Baxter G.D. Biopsychosocial screening questionnaire for patients with low back pain: preliminary report of utility in physiotherapy practice in Northern Ireland. Clin J Pain 16 (2000) 214-228
14. Schouw van der Y.T., Verbeek A., and Ruijs J.H.J. ROC curves for the initial assessment of new diagnostic tests. Fam Pract 9 (1992) 506-511
15. Hurley D.A., Dusoir T.E., McDonough S., Moore A.P., and Baxter G.D. How effective is the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 17 (2001) 256-263
16. Felson D.T., Meenan R.F., Dayno S.J., and Gertman P. Referral of musculoskeletal disease patients by family and general practitioners. Arthritis Rheum 28 (1985) 1156-1162
17. Clemence M.L., and Seamark D.A. GP referral for physiotherapy to musculoskeletal conditions-a qualitative study. Fam Pract 20 (2003) 578-582