Cancer patient assessment and reports of excellence: Reliability and validity of advanced cancer patient perceptions of the quality of care

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1621-1626

  Teno, Joan M ^a   Lima, Julie C ^a   Lyons, Kathleen Doyle ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS CANCER; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 63749087498     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6348     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. DonabedianA: Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44:166-206,1966(suppl 1)
2. Williams SJ, Calnan M: Convergence and divergence: Assessing criteria of consumer satisfaction across general practice, dental and hospital care settings. Soc Sci Med 33:707-716, 1991
3. Cleary PD, Edgman Levitan S, Roberts M, et al: Patients evaluate their hospital care: A national survey. Health Aff Millwood 10:254-267, 1991
4. Griffin JP, Nelson JE, Koch KA, et al: End-of- life care in patients with lung cancer. Chest 123: 312S-331S, 2003 (suppl 1)
5. Sloan PA, Vanderveer BL, Snapp JS, et al: Cancer pain assessment and management recommendations by hospice nurses. University of
6. Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. J Pain Symptom Manage 18:103-110, 1999
7. Coackley A, Hutchinson T, Saltmarsh P, et al: Assessment and management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: Developing guidelines. Int J Palliat Nurs 8:381-388, 2002
8. Lee J, Marchbank A, Goldstraw P: Implementation of the British Thoracic Society recommendations for organising the care of patients with lung cancer: The surgeon's perspective. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:304-308, 2002
9. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN): Management of patients with lung cancer. A national clinical guideline. http://www.sign.ac.uk/ pdf/qrg80.pdf
10. American Cancer Society and National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Distress treatment guidelines for patients. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/CRI/ NCCN-Distress-Guidelines-2008.pdf
11. Peterson R, Whitman H, Smith J: Oncology Nursing Society Multicultural Outcomes: Guidelines for Cultural Competence. Pittsburgh, PA, Oncology Nursing Society, 1999
12. Working Group of the Ethical Issues in Medicine Committee of the Royal College of Physicians: Principles of pain control in palliative care for adults. J R Coll Physicians 34:350-352, 2000
13. Cancer care during the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 16:1986-1996, 1998
14. Department of Health Clinical Outcomes Group, Cancer Guidance Subgroup: Guidance on Commissioning Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Lung Cancer-The Manual. London, United Kingdom, National Health Service, 1998
15. Forcina JM: Re: National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom Management in Cancer: Pain, Depression, and Fatigue, July 15-17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1109-1110, 2004
16. University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center: Acute pain management in the elderly. http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/research/ evidencebased.htm
17. National Comprehensive Cancer Network/ American Cancer Society: Advanced cancer and palliative care: treatment guidelines for patients. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/CRI-2-3x.asp?dt=79
18. Teno JM, Clarridge B, Casey V, et al: Validation of Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview. J Pain Symptom Manage 22:752-758, 2001
19. Rumpf HJ, Meyer C, Hapke U, et al: Screening for mental health: Validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Res 105:243-253, 2001
20. Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams VS, et al: Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. Med Care 37:MS22-MS31, 1999
21. Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, et al: Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care 29:169-176, 1991
22. Thomas R, Kaminski E, Stanton E, et al: Measuring information strategies in oncology: Developing an information satisfaction questionnaire. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 13:65-70, 2004
23. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, et al: Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ 319:1247-1248, 1999
24. Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, et al: Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: Satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27: 96-103, 2005
25. Llewellyn CD, Horne R, McGurk M, et al: Development and preliminary validation of a new measure to assess satisfaction with information among head and neck cancer patients: The satisfaction with cancer information profile (SCIP). Head Neck 28:540-548, 2006
26. Brett J, Austoker J: Development and validation of the EBS: A measure to assess women's experience at all stages of the breast screening process. J Public Health (Oxf) 26:79-83, 2004
27. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: Preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy. Ann Oncol 10:839-846, 1999
28. Sandoval GA, Brown AD, Sullivan T, et al: Factors that influence cancer patients' overall perceptions of the quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 18:266-274, 2006
29. Watson DE, Mooney D, Peterson S: Patient experiences with ambulatory cancer care in British Columbia, 2005/06. http://www.chspr.ubc.ca/files/ publications/2007/chspr-07-4R.pdf
30. McCorkle R: Response to Oberst. Cancer 53:2373-2375, 1984
31. Teno JM: Quality of Care and Quality Indicators for End-of-Life Cancer Care: Hope for the Best, Yet Prepare for the Worst. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2001, 96-131