A model-driven top-down approach to inter-organizational systems: From global choreography models to executable BPEL

Proceedings - 10th IEEE Joint Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the 5th Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, CEC 2008 and EEE 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 136-145

  Hofreiter, Birgit ^a,b   Huemer, Christian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS GOALS; BUSINESS PARTNERS; BUSINESS PROCESS EXECUTION LANGUAGES; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS PROCESS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS; IT SOLUTIONS; MODEL-DRIVEN; MODEL-DRIVEN APPROACHES; MODELING METHODOLOGIES; TOP-DOWN APPROACHES; UML PROFILES; UN/CEFACT; WORK-FLOWS; WS-BPEL;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 63749083892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CECandEEE.2008.129     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. B. Hofreiter. Extending UN/CEFACTs modeling methodology by a UML profile for local choreographies. Journal on Information Systems and E-Business Management, 0(0), 2008. to appear, online first: 10.1007/s10257-008-0083-3.
2. B. Hofreiter and C. Huemer. Transforming UMM Business Collaboration Models to BPEL. In OTM 2004 Workshops, volume 3292 of LNCS, pages 507-519, 2004.
3. B. Hofreiter, C. Huemer, P. Liegl, R. Schuster, and M. Zapletal. UN/CEFACT'S Modeling Methodology (UMM): A UML Profile for B2B e-Commerce. In ER 2006 Workshops, volume 4231 of LNCS, pages 19-31. Springer, 2006.
4. B. Hofreiter, C. Huemer, P. Liegl, R. Schuster, and M. Zapletal. UMM Add-In: A UML Extension for UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology. In Service-Oriented Computing -ICSOC 2007, Fifth International Conference, volume 4749 of LNCS, pages 618-619. Springer, 2007.
5. R. Khalaf. From RosettaNet PIPs to BPEL processes: A three level approach for business protocols. Data Knowl. Eng., 61(1):23-38, 2007.
6. B. Korherr and B. List. Extending the UML 2 Activity Diagram with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures and the Mapping to BPEL. In ER 2006 Workshops, volume 4231 of LNCS, pages 7-18. Springer, 2006.
7. G. Kramler, E. Kapsammer, G. Kappel, and W. Retschitzegger. Towards Using UML 2 for Modelling Web Service Collaboration Protocols. In Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA'05), pages 227-238. Springer, 2005.
8. B. List and B. Korherr. A UML 2 Profile for Business Process Modelling. In ER 2005 Workshops, volume 3770 of LNCS, pages 85-96. Springer, 2005.
9. J. Mendling and M. Hafner. From Inter-organizational Workflows to Process Execution: Generating BPEL from WS-CDL. In OTM 2005 Workshops, volume 3762 of LNCS, pages 506-515. Springer, 2005.
10. C. Ouyang, M. Dumas, A. H. ter Hofstede, and W. M. van der Aalst. From BPMN Process Models to BPEL Web Services. In International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pages 285-292. IEEE, 2006.
11. C. Peltz. Web services orchestration and choreography. IEEE Computer, 36(10):46-52, 2003.
12. M. Penker and H.-E. Eriksson. Business Modeling With UML: Business Patterns at Work. Wiley, 2000.
13. RosettaNet. RosettaNet Implementation Framework: Core Specification, Dec. 2002. V02.00.01.
14. D. Skogan, R. Gronmo, and I. Solheim. Web Service Composition in UML. In 8th IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pages 47-57. IEEE, 2004.
15. UN/CEFACT. UN/CEFACT's Modeling Methodology (UMM), UMM Meta Model - Foundation Module, Mar. 2006. Technical Specification V1.0, http://www.unece.org/cefact/umm/UMM-Foundation-Module.pdf.
16. W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.