Circumscribed mass lesions on mammography: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to differentiate malignancy and benignancy

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 195-204

  Okafuji, Takashi ^a   Yabuuchi, Hidetake ^a   Soeda, Hiroyasu ^a   Matsuo, Yoshio ^a   Kamitani, Takeshi ^a   Sakai, Shuji ^a   Hatakenaka, Masamitsu ^a   Kuroki, Syoji ^b   Tokunaga, Eriko ^b   Yamamoto, Hidetaka ^a   Honda, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Mammography; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63649114062     PISSN: 13473182     EISSN: 18802206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.7.195     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)-MAMMOGRAPHY. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
2. Sickles EA. Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 1999; 213: 11-14.
3. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004; 233:850-856.
4. Lesnefsky MH, Reynolds HE, Jackson VP. Circumscribed breast cancer: a reassessment using ACR BI-RADS terminology. Radiology 1999; 213: 239.
5. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, et al. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 551-557.
6. Matsuda M, Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, et al. Mammographic and clinicopathological features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer 2000; 7:65-70.
7. Memis A, Ozdemir N, Parildar M, Ustun EE, Erhan Y. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: mammographic and US features with histologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 2000; 35:39-43.
8. Yilmaz E, Lebe B, Malci P, Sal S, Canda T. Comparison of mammographic and sonographic findings in typical and atypical medullary carcinomas of the breast. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:640-645.
9. Soo MS, Williford ME, Walsh R, Bentley RC, Kornguth PJ. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:321-326.
10. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
11. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110.
12. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel S. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001; 219:484-494.
13. Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, Kacl G, Garzoli E, Krestin GP. Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:501-509.
14. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions. Diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:35-43.
15. Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:878-886.
16. Orel SG. Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 1999; 211:5-7.
17. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:889-895.
18. American College of Radiology (ACR). BI-RADSMRI. 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
19. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006; 5:7-15.
20. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996; 200:639-649.
21. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:171-178.
22. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881-888.
23. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
24. Wedegartner U, Bick U, Wortler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1645-1650.
25. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:440-454.
26. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:421-430.
27. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000; 217:841-848.
28. Wurdinger S, Herzog AB, Fischer DR, et al. Differentiation of phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 185:1317-1321.
29. Hochman MG, Orel SG, Powell CM, Schnall MD, Reynolds CA, White LN. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1997; 204:123-129.
30. Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H. Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 1999; 210:233-240.
31. Isomoto T, Koshiishi T, Okimoto T, Okada H, Uetani M, Hayashi K. [Gradually enhancing breast cancer on dynamic MRI]. Nippon Acta Radiologica 2000; 60:514-519. (in Japanese)
32. Ghai S, Muradali D, Bukhanov K, Kulkarni S. Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185:481-487.
33. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast missed by contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 1996; 6:929-931.