Consumer opinions about frequency of artifacts in digital video

IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 336-343

  Cermak, Gregory W ^a  

^a Verizon Laboratories   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer; Quality; Video

Indexed keywords

CABLES; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

CONSUMER; DIGITAL CABLES; DIGITAL VIDEOS; DISCOUNTED PRICES; PERCEIVED VIDEO QUALITIES; QUALITY; QUALITY VIDEOS; RULE OF THUMBS; SATELLITE SERVICES; VIDEO; VIDEO NETWORKS; VIDEO QUALITIES; VIDEO SERVICES;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 63649113509     PISSN: 19324553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2014495     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference, ITU-T, J.144R1, ITU Rec., 2004.
2. "Triple-play Services Quality of Experience (QoE) Requirements," DSL Forum, Tech. Rep. TR-126 2©006 Digital Subscriber Line Forum.
3. A. Reibman, S. Kanumuri, V. Vaishampayan, and P. Cosman, "Visibility of individual packet losses in MPEG-2 video," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process., 2004, pp. 171-174.
4. D. Hands, C. Partridge, K. Cheng, and R. Jacobs, "Price-dependent quality: Examining the effects of price on multimedia quality requirements," in Proc. SPIE Electron. Imag. Conf., San Jose, CA, Jan. 2007.
5. H.-H. Ho, T. Wolff, M. Salatino, J. Foley, S. Mitra, T. Yamada, and H. Harasaki, "An investigation on the subjective quality of H.264 compressed/decompressed videos," in Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop. Video Process. Qual. Metrics Consumer Electron., 2007, CD-ROM.
6. IPTV Packet Loss ATIS, Alliance for Telecomm. Ind. Solutions, Rep. IIF-WT-009R13, 2006.
7. "Working document: Quality of experience requirements for IPTV," ITU Focus Group On IPTV, FG IPTV-Doc-0086, May 2007, also see FG IPTV-DOC-0118, Jul. 2007.
8. G. Cermak, P. Corriveau, M. Farias, T. Martin, M. Pinson, F. Speranza, and A.Webster, "Final report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, Phase II," VQEG, 2003.
9. K. Brunnstrom, G. Cermak, D. Hands, M. Pinson, F. Speranza, and A. Webster, "Final report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the validation of objective models of multimedia quality assessment, Phase I," VQEG, 2008.
10. G. Cermak, "Budget allocation as a measure of potential demand," J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 591-613, 1996.
11. S. Goldberg, P. Green, and Y. Wind, "Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities," J. Bus., vol. 57, pp. 111-132, 1984.
12. R. Luce and J. Tukey, "Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement," J. Math. Psychol., vol. 1, pp. 1-27, 1964.
13. E. Carterette and M. Friedman, Handbook of Perception, Volume II: Psychophysical Judgment and Measurement. New York: Academic, 1974.
14. G. Cermak, "Verbal descriptors for VoIP speech sounds," Int. J. Speech Technol., vol. 7, pp. 81-91, 2004.
15. S. Wolf and G. Kelly, "Proposed attributes of a video reference unit (VRU) and the need for a standardized set of video test scenes," Committee T1 Contribution, T1A1.5/93-150. Committee T1, 1993.
16. A. Morton, "Draft ANSI standard specification of video performance terms, definitions, and examples," Committee T1 Contribution, T1A1.5/95-108 R1. Committee T1, 1995.
17. A. Griffin and J. Hauser, "The voice of the customer," Marketing Sci., vol. 12, pp. 1-27, 1993.
18. G. Cermak, "Subjective quality of video as a function of frequency of artifacts," presented at the 3rd Int. Workshop Video Process. Quality Metrics Consumer Electron., Scottsdale, AZ, Jan. 26, 2007, unpublished.