Space debris: Assessing risk and responsibility

Advances in Space Research

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1372-1390

  Bradley, Andrew M ^a   Wein, Lawrence M ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antisatellite weapon test; Low Earth orbit; Mitigation; Space debris

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMMUNICATION SATELLITES; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EARTH (PLANET); ORBITS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPACE FLIGHT; SPACECRAFT;

ANTI-SATELLITE WEAPONS; LOW EARTH ORBITS; MITIGATION; OPERATIONAL LIFETIME; OPERATIONAL SPACECRAFT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL;

SPACE DEBRIS;

EID: 63649111525     PISSN: 02731177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alberty R.A., and Silbey R.J. Physical Chemistry. second ed. (1997), John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
2. Bradley, A.M., Wein, L.M. Space Debris: Assessing Risk and Responsibility. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2008.
3. Claussen, E., McNeilly, L. Equity and Global Climate Change: the Complex Elements of Global Fairness. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, October 29, 1998. Accessed at: (accessed May 20, 1998).
4. de Weck, O., de Neufville, R., Chang, D., Chaize, M. Technical Success and Economic Failure. Unit 1 of Communications Satellite Constellations, Engineering Systems Learning Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA, October 14, 2003. Accessed at: (accessed June 2, 2008).
5. Farinella P., and Cordelli A. The proliferation of orbiting fragments: a simple mathematical model. Sci. Global Security 2 (1991) 365-378
6. Frost and Sullivan. Commercial Communications Satellite Bus Reliability Analysis, August 2004. Accessed at: (accessed June 3, 2008).
7. Guidelines and Assessment Procedures for Limiting Orbital Debris, NASA Safety Standard 1740.14, NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, August 1995.
8. Johnson N.L. Space traffic management: concepts and practices. Space Policy 20 (2004) 79-85
9. Johnson N.L., Krisko P.H., Liou J.-C., and Anz-Meador P.D. NASA's new breakup model of EVOLVE 4.0. Adv. Space Res. 28 (2001) 1377-1384
10. Kaula W.M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy (1983), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
11. Kessler, D.J. Critical Density of Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit: Using Fragmentation Data to Evaluate the Stability of the Orbital Debris Environment. Johnson Space Center Report No. 28949, NASA and LMSEAT Report No. 33303, Lockheed Martin, February 2000.
12. King-Hele D. Theory of Satellite Orbits in an Atmosphere (1964), Blackie, Glascow and London
13. Liou J.-C., and Johnson N.L. A LEO satellite postmission disposal study using LEGEND. Acta Astronaut. 57 (2005) 324-329
14. Liou J.-C., and Johnson N.L. Risks in space from orbiting debris. Science 311 (2006) 340-341
15. Liou, J.-C., Johnson, N.L., A Sensitivity Analysis of the Effectiveness of Active Debris Removal in LEO, Paper IAC-07-A6.3.05. International Astronautical Congress, Hyderabad, India, September 2007. Accessed at: (accessed December 17, 2007).
16. Liou J.-C., and Johnson N.L. Instability of the present LEO satellite populations. Adv. Space Res. 41 (2008) 1046-1053
17. Liou J.-C., and Portman S. Chinese anti-satellite test creates most severe orbital debris cloud in history. Orbital Debris Quart. News 11 (2007) 2-3
18. Liou J.-C., Hall D.T., Krisko P.H., and Opiela J.N. LEGEND - a three-dimensional LEO-to-GEO debris evolutionary model. Adv. Space Res. 34 (2004) 981-986
19. Long J.C.S., and Ewing R.C. Yucca Mountain: Earth-science issues at a geologic repository for high-level nuclear waste. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32 (2004) 363-401
20. Perman R., Ma Y., McGilvray J., and Common M. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. third ed. (2003), Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow, UK
21. Prasad M.Y.S. Technical and legal issues surrounding space debris - India's position in the UN. Space Policy 21 (2005) 243-249
22. Proposal for Forming an IAA study group, IAA, Paris, October 2000. Available at: (accessed June 10, 2008).
23. Rossi A. Energetic cost and viability of the proposed space debris mitigation measures. J. Spacecraft Rockets 39 (2002) 540-550
24. Rossi A., Cordelli A., Farinella P., and Anselmo L. Collisional evolution of Earth's orbital debris cloud. J. Geophys. Res. 99 (1994) 23195-23210
25. Rossi A., Anselmo L., Cordelli A., Farinella P., and Pardini C. Modelling the evolution of the space debris population. Planet. Space Sci. 46 (1998) 1583-1596
26. Ryden, K.A., Fearn, D.G., Crowther, R. Electric propulsion: a solution to end-of-life disposal of satellites? in: Flury, W. (Ed.), Proc. Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands, pp. 709-712, 1997.
27. Soroos M.S. The commons in the sky: the radio spectrum and geosynchronous orbit as issues in global policy. Int. Organiz. 36 (1982) 665-677
28. Space Track. Available at: (accessed April 30, 2008).
29. Walker R., and Martin C.E. Cost-effective and robust mitigation of space debris in low Earth orbit. Adv. Space Res. 34 (2004) 1233-1240
30. Wiedemann C., Krag H., Bendisch J., and Sdunnus H. Analyzing costs of space debris mitigation methods. Adv. Space Res. 34 (2004) 1241-1245