PH-induced contrast in viscoelasticity imaging of biopolymers

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1089-1109

  Yapp, R D ^a   Insana, M F ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDIC CONDITIONS; COMPLEX MODULUS; CONTRAST MECHANISMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISCRIMINABILITY; ELASTIC RESPONSE; ELASTICITY IMAGING; EXTRA CELLULAR MATRICES; EXTRACELLULAR PH; GELATIN HYDROGELS; MATRIXES; PH CHANGES; PHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES; POLYMER NETWORKS; PROTEOGLYCANS; QUASI STATICS; RELAXATION MEASUREMENTS; TIME-DOMAIN MODELS; TUMOURS; VASCULAR NETWORKS; VISCO-ELASTIC PROPERTIES; VISCOELASTICITY IMAGING; VISCOUS RESPONSE;

BIOMOLECULES; BIOPOLYMERS; ELASTICITY; HYDROGELS; ONCOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; POLYMERS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; TUMORS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; VISCOELASTICITY;

PH EFFECTS;

BIOPOLYMER; CONTRAST MEDIUM; PROTEOGLYCAN;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; ELASTOGRAPHY; IMAGING SYSTEM; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY;

BIOPOLYMERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GELATIN; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; VISCOSITY;

EID: 63549084193     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bhattacharjee A and Bansal M 2005 Collagen structure: the madras triple helix and the current scenario IUBMB Life 57 161-72
2. Brown W H 2002 Introduction to Organic Chemistry 2nd edn (New Jersey: Wiley)
3. Buehler M J and Wong S Y 2007 Entropic elasticity controls nanomechanics of single tropocollagen molecules Biophys. J. 93 37-43
4. Chaturvedi P, Insana M and Hall T 1998 Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferrorelectr. Freq. Control 45 1022-31
5. Cumper C W N and Alexander A E 1952 The viscosity and rigidity of gelatin in concentrated aqueous systems: II. Rigidity Aust. J. Sci. Res. Ser. A: Phys. Sci. 5 153-9
6. Djabourov M 1988 Architecture of gelatin gels Contemp. Phys. 29 273-97
7. Doyley M M, Sriivasan S, Dimidenko E, Soni N and Ophir J 2006 Enhancing the performance of model-based elastography by incorporating additional a priori information in the modulus image reconstruction process Phys. Med. Biol. 51 95-112
8. Elenbaas B and Weinberg R A 2001 Heterotypic signaling between epithelial tumor cells and fibroblasts in carcinoma formation Exp. Cell Res. 264 169-84
9. Fata J E, Werb Z and Bissell M J 2004 Regulation of mammary gland branching morphogenesis by the extracellular matrix and its remodeling enzymes Breast Cancer Res. 6 1-11
10. Ferry J D 1980 Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers 3rd edn (New York: Wiley)
11. Fried J R 2003 Polymer Science and Technology 2nd edn (New Jersey: Pearson Education)
12. Garra B S, Cespedes E I, Ophir J, Spratt S R, Zuurbier R A, Magnant C M and Pennanen M F 1997 Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results Radiology 202 79-86
13. Gerweck L E, Vijayappa S and Kozin S 2006 Tumor pH controls the in vivo efficacy of weak acid and base chemotherapeutics Mol. Cancer Ther. 5 1275-9
14. Gillies R J, Raghunand N, Garcia-Martin M L and Gatenby R A 2004 pH Imaging IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 23 57-64
15. Gobeaux F, Mosser G, Anglo A, Panine P, Davidson P, Giraud-Guille M M and Belamie E 2008 Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physiochemical study J. Mol. Biol. 376 1509-22
16. Hall T J, Bilgen M, Insana M F and Krouskop T A 1997 Phantom materials for elastography IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferrorelectr. Freq. Control 44 1355-65
17. Highberger J H 1939 The isoelectric point of collagen J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61 2302-3
18. Hitchcock D I 1931 The isoelectric point of a standard gelatin preparation J. Gen. Physiol. 14 685-99
19. Joly-Duhamel C, Hellio D, Ajdari A and Djabourov M 2002 All gelatin networks: 2. The master curve for elasticity Langmuir 18 7158-66
20. Kalyanam S, Yapp R D and Insana M F 2009 Poroviscoelastic behavior of gelatin hydrogels: implications for bioelasticity imaging ASME J. Biomech. Eng. at press
21. Khaled W, Reichling S, Bruhns O T and Ermert H 2006 Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue Ultrasonics 44 e199-202
22. Liu J, Abbey C K and Insana M F 2004 Linear approach to axial resolution in elasticity imaging IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferrorelectr. Freq. Control 51 716-25
23. Mohanty B, Gupta A, Bohidar H B and Bandyopadhyay S 2007 Effect of gelatin molecular charge heterogeneity on formation of intermolecular complexes and coacervation transition J. Polym. Sci. B 45 1511-20
24. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y and Li X 1991 Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues Ultrason. Imaging 13 111-34
25. Pellot-Barakat C, Sridhar M, Lindfors K K and Insana M F 2006 Ultrasonic elasticity imaging as a tool for breast cancer diagnosis and research Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 2 157-64
26. Ponnekanti H, Ophir J, Huang Y and Cespedes I 1995 Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography Ultrasound Med. Biol. 21 533-43
27. Qiu Y, Sridhar M, Tsou J K, Lindfors K K and Insana M F 2008 Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results Acad. Radiol. 15 1526-33
28. Roeder B A, Kokini K, Sturgis J E, Robinson J P and Voytik-Harbin S L 2002 Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 124 214-22
29. Seehra G P and Silver F H 2006 Viscoelastic properties of acid- and alkaline-treated human dermis: a correlation between total surface charge and elastic modulus Skin Res. Technol. 12 190-8
30. Sharma A C, Soo M S, Trahey G E and Nightingale K R 2004 Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of in vivo breast masses IEEE Ultrason. Symp. pp 728-31
31. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C and Fink M 2007 MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1135-44
32. Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J and Fink M 2005 Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 159-65
33. Sridhar M and Insana M F 2007 Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity Med. Phys. 34 4757-67
34. Sridhar M, Liu J and Insana M F 2007a Elasticity imaging of polymeric media ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 129 259-72
35. Sridhar M, Liu J and Insana M F 2007b Viscoelasticity imaging using ultrasound: parameters and error analysis Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2425-43
36. Stoeckelhuber M, Stumpf P, Hoefter E A and Welsch U 2002 Proteoglycan-collagen associations in the non-lactating human breast connective tissue during the menstrual cycle Histochem. Cell Biol. 118 221-30
37. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, Deffieux T, Gennisson J, Montaldo G, Muller M, Tardivon A and Fink M 2008 Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34 1373-86
38. Tschoegl N W 1989 The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior (New York: Springer)
39. Usha R and Ramasami T 2000 Effect of pH on dimensional stability of rat tail tendon collagen fiber J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 75 1577-84
40. Veis A 1964 The Macromolecular Chemistry of Gelatin (New York: Academic)
41. Yapp R, Kalyanam S and Insana M 2007 Molecular and structural analysis of viscoelastic properties Proc. SPIE Med. Imaging 6511 65111Y-1-65111Y-11