Participatory GIS and community planning: Restructuring technologies, social processes, and future research in PPGIS

Collaborative Geographic Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 66-84

  Elwood, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63449139933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Aitken, S., & Michel, M. (1995). Who contrives the "real" in GIS? Geographic information, planning, and critical theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 17-29.
2. Al-Kodmany, K. (2000). Extending geographic information systems (GIS) to meet neighborhood planning needs: Recent developments in the work of the University of Illinois at Chicago. The URISA Journal, 12(3), 19-37.
3. Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal, 35, 216-224.
4. Barndt, M., & Craig, T. H. D. W. (2002). A model for evaluating public participation GIS. In Anonymous (Ed.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 346-356). London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Baum, H. (1999). Community organizations recruiting community participation: Predicaments in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, 187-199.
6. Bright, E. (2003). Reviving America's forgotten neighborhoods: An investigation of inner-city revitalization efforts. New York: Routledge.
7. Campbell, H., & Masser, I. (1995). GIS and organizations. London: Taylor and Francis.
8. Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century. The URISA Journal, 15(APAI), 61-72.
9. Craglia, M., & Masser, I. (2003). Access to geographic information: A European perspective. The URISA Journal, 15(APAI), 51-60.
10. Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Introduction. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 1-16). London: Taylor & Francis.
11. Crampton, J. (2003). Cartographic rationality and the politics of geosurveillance and security. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(2), 135-149.
12. Crompvoets, J., & Bregt, A. (2003). World status of national spatial data clearinghouses. The URISA Journal, 15(APAI), 43-50.
13. Dorsey, B. (2001). Linking theories of service-learning and undergraduate geography education. Journal of Geography, 100(3), 124-132.
14. Drew, C. (2003). Transparency: Considerations for PPGIS research and development. The URISA Journal, 15(APAI), 73-80.
15. Egenhofer, M., Mark, D., Frank, A., & Kuhn, W. (1995). Naive geography. In Anonymous (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 988, pp. 1-15). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
16. Elwood, S. (2002). GIS and collaborative urban governance: Understanding their implications for community action and power. Urban Geography, 22(8), 737-759.
17. Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2004). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 19-33.
18. Elwood, S., & Leitner, H. (2003). Community-based planning and GIS: Aligning neighborhood organizations with state priorities? Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 139-157.
19. Esnard, A., Gelobter, M., & Morales, X. (2001/2004). Environmental justice, GIS, and pedagogy. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 53-61.
20. Ferman, B., & Hill, T. (2004). The challenges of agenda conflict in higher education-community research partnerships: Views from the community side. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 241-257.
21. Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization, and community-oriented GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 67-76.
22. Harvey, F. (2001). Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration. The URISA Journal, 13(1), 29-38.
23. Healy, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
24. HUD. (2001). The empowerment zones and enterprise communities program. Washington, D.C.: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
25. Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). GIS-supported collaborative decisionmaking: Results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(1), 48-70.
26. Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: Putting people before the technology. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232-245). London: Taylor & Francis.
27. Kellogg, W. (1999). From the field: Observations on using GIS to develop a neighborhood environmental information systems for community-based organizations. The URISA Journal, 11(1), 15-32.
28. Kemp, K. (1997). The NCGIA core curricula in GIS and remote sensing. Transactions in GIS, 2(2), 181-190.
29. Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006Forthcoming). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A.
30. Krouk, D., Pitkin, B., & Richman, N. (2000). Internet-based neighborhood information systems: A comparative analysis. In M. Gurstein (Ed.), Community informatics: Enabling community uses of information technologies (pp. 275-297). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
31. Kwan, M. (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geography research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645-661.
32. Kyem, P. (2002). Promoting local community participation in forest management through a participation GIS application in Southern Ghana. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 218-230). London: Taylor & Francis.
33. Kyem, K. (2004). Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: The search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 37-57.
34. Laituri, M. (2003). The issue of access: An assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science case studies. The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 25-32.
35. Leitner, H., Elwood, S., Sheppard, E., McMaster, S., & McMaster, R. (2000). Modes of GIS provision and their appropriateness for neighborhood organizations: Examples from Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. The URISA Journal, 12(4), 43-56.
36. MacEachren, A., & Taylor, D. (1994). Visualization in modern cartography. Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier.
37. Masucci, M., & Gilbert, M. (2004). Moving beyond "gender and GIS" to a feminist perspective on information technonology. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 305-321). London/New York: Blackwell.
38. McLafferty, S. (2002). Mapping women's worlds: Knowledge, power, and the bounds of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture, 9(3), 263-269.
39. Merrick, M. (2003). Reflections on PPGIS: A view from the trenches. The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 33-40.
40. Norheim, R. (2004). How institutional culture affects results: Comparing two old growth forest mapping projects. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 35-52.
41. ODPM. (2002). Making the system work better: Planning at regional and local levels. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
42. Pain, R. (2003). Social geography: On action orientated research. Progress in Human Geography, 27(5), 649-657.
43. Peng, Z., & Tsou, M. (2003). Internet GIS: Distributed geographic information services for the Internet and wireless networks. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
44. Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford.
45. Rugg, R. (2003). A framework for the use of geographic information in participatory community planning and development. The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 75-80.
46. Sawicki, D., & Peterman, W. (2002). Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 17-36). London: Taylor & Francis.
47. Schuurman, N. (2002). Flexible standardization: Making interoperability accessible to agencies with limited resources. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29(4), 343-353.
48. Schuurman, N. (2004). GIS: A short introduction. London: Blackwell.
49. Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford.
50. Shiffer, M. (2002). Spatial multimedia representations to support community participation. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 309-320). London: Taylor & Francis.
51. Sieber, R. (2000). GIS implementation in the grassroots. URISA Journal, 12(1), 15-51.
52. Sieber, R. (2004). Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica, 39(1), 25-40.
53. Smith, R., & Craglia, M. (2003). Digital participation and access to geographic information: A case study of local government in the United Kingdom. The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 49-54.
54. Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 279-294.
55. Tulloch, D., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: Impacting GIS users' success? The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 55-60.
56. Warren, S. (2004). The utopian potential of GIS. Cartographica, 39(1), 5-15.
57. Weiner, D., & Harris, T. (2003). Community-integrated GIS for land reform in South Africa. The URISA Journal, 15(APAII), 61-73.
58. Weiner, D., Warner, T., Harris, T., & Levin, R. (1995). Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing, and local knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 30-44.
59. Williams, C., & Dunn, C. (2003). GIS in participatory research: Assessing the impacts of landmines on communities in northwest Cambodia. Transactions in GIS, 7(3), 393-410.
60. Wong, S., & Chua, Y. (2004). Data intermediation and beyond: Issues for Web-based PPGIS. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 63-79.