Paradigms in biological classification (1707-2007): Has anything really changed?

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 68-76

  Stuessy, Tod F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Explicit phyletics; History; Information content; Paradigms; Phenetics

Indexed keywords

BOTANY; CLADISTICS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 63449139014     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.581010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Adanson, M. 1763. Familles des Plantes. Vincent, Paris.
2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531-553.
3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
4. Ashlock, P.D. 1971. Monophyly and associated terms. Syst. Zool. 20: 63-69.
5. Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. 1862-1883. Genera Plantarum, 3 vols. Reeve, London.
6. Bessey, C. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2: 109-164.
7. Bock, W.J. 1989. The homology concept: its philosophical foundation and practical methodology. Zool. Beitr., N.F. 32: 337-353.
8. Caesalpino, A. 1583. De Plantis, Libri XVI. Apud Georgium Marescottum, Florence.
9. Camerarius, R.J. 1694. De Sexu Plantarum Epistola. Tübingen.
10. Camin, J.H. & Sokal, R.R. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19: 311-326.
11. Candolle, A.L.P.P. (ed.). 1844-1873. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vols. 8-17. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris.
12. Candolle, A.P. de (ed.). 1824-1838. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vols. 1-7. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris.
13. Correns, C. 1900. G. Mendel's Regel über das Verhalten der Nachkommenschaft der Rassenbastarde. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 18: 158-168.
14. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
15. Dahlgren, R. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91-124.
16. Darwin, C. 1851, 1854. A Monograph of the Sub-class Cirripedia; With Figures of All the Species. Ray Society, London.
17. Darwin, C. 1859. On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
18. De Vries, H. 1900. Das Spaltungsgesetz der Bastarde. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 18: 83-90.
19. Eldredge, N. & Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82-115 in: Schopf, T.J.M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper & Co., San Francisco.
20. Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.). 1887-1915. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Engelmann, Leipzig.
21. Estabrook, G.F. 1986. Evolutionary classification using convex phenetics. Syst. Zool. 35: 560-570.
22. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring Phylogeny. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
23. Giseke, P.D. 1792. Praelectiones in Ordines Naturales Plantarum. B.G. Hoffmann, Hamburg.
24. Hall, A.V. 1988. A joint phenetic and cladistic approach for systematics. J. Linn. Soc., Biol. 33: 367-382.
25. Hall, A.V. 1991. A unifying theory for methods of systematic analysis. J. Linn. Soc., Biol. 42: 425-456.
26. Hennig, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
27. Hennig, W. (translated Davis, D.D. & Zangerl, R.). 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.
28. Hörandl, E. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa - evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564-570.
29. Hörandl, E. 2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 56: 1-5.
30. Hutchinson, J. 1926, 1934. The Families of Flowering Plants I, Dicotyledons; II, Monocotyledons. Arranged According to a New System Based on Their Probable Phylogeny. Macmillan, London.
31. Jensen, R.J. 2009. Phenetics: revolution, reform or natural consequence? Taxon 58: 50-60.
32. Jussieu, A.L. de. 1789. Genera Plantarum Secundum Ordines Naturales Disposita. Apud Herissant et Barrois, Paris.
33. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, ed. 2. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. Lamarck, J.B.P.A. de M. de. 1778. Flore Françoise, 3 vols. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.
35. Linnaeus, C. 1729. Praeludia Sponsaliorum Plantarum. Uppsala.
36. Linnaeus, C. 1735. Systema Naturae. Apud Theodorum Haak, Leiden.
37. Linnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophia Botanica. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.
38. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, 2 vols. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.
39. Mayr, E. 1974. Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. 12: 94-128.
40. Mayr, E. & Bock, W.J. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 40: 169-194.
41. Mendel, G. 1866. Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Verh. Naturf. Vereins Brünn 4: 3-47.
42. Michener, C.D. & Sokal, R.R. 1957. A quantitative approach to a problem in classification. Evolution 11: 130-162.
43. Mishler, B.D. 2009. Three centuries of paradigm changes in biological classification: Is the end in sight? Taxon 58: 61-67.
44. Morton, A.G. 1981. History of Botanical Science: An Account of the Development of Botany from Ancient Times to the Present Day. Academic Press, London.
45. Ray, J. 1686-1704. Historia Plantarum. London.
46. Reid, G. 2009. Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778): his life, philosophy and science and its relationship to modern biology and medicine. Taxon 58: 18-31.
47. Simpson. G.G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
48. Sneath, P.H.A. 1957. The application of computers to taxonomy. J. Gen. Microbiol. 17: 201-226.
49. Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. Freeman, San Francisco.
50. Sokal, R.R. & Sneath, P.H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.
51. Stevens, P.F. 2009. Characters, taxonomic groups, and relationships in botany 1770-1850 as exemplified by the work of Henri Cassini. Taxon 58: 32-42.
52. Stuessy, T.F. 1987. Explicit approaches for evolutionary classification. Syst. Bot. 12: 251-262.
53. Stuessy, T.F. 1990. Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
54. Stuessy, T.F. 1997. Classification: more than just branching patterns of evolution. Aliso 15: 113-124.
55. Stuessy, T.F. 2003. Morphological data in plant systematics. Pp. 299-315 in: Stuessy, T.F., Mayer, V. & Hörandl, E. (eds.), Deep Morphology: Toward a Renaissance of Morphology in Plant Systematics. Gantner, Ruggell, Liechtenstein.
56. Stuessy, T.F. 2006. Principles and practice of plant taxonomy. Pp. 31-44 in: Leadlay, E. & Jury, S. (eds.), Taxonomy and Plant Conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
57. Stuessy, T.F. & König, C. 2008. Patrocladistic classification. Taxon 57: 594-601.
58. Takhtajan, A. (transl. by Jeffrey, C.). 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
59. Thorne, R.F. 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evol. Biol. 9: 35-106.
60. Tournefort, J.P. de. 1700. Institutiones Rei Herbariae, edition altera. Paris.
61. Tschermak, E. 1900. Über künstliche Kreuzung bei Pisum sativum. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 18: 232-239.
62. Watson, J.D. & Crick, F.H.C. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171: 737-738.
63. Wettstein, R. 1901-1908. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik, 2 vols. Deuticke, Leipzig and Wien.
64. Williams, R.L. 2001. Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
65. Winsor, M.P. 2004. Setting up milestones: Sneath on Adanson and Mayr on Darwin. Pp. 1-17 in: Williams, D.M. & Forey, P.L. (eds.), Milestones in Systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
66. Winsor, M.P. 2009. Taxonomy was the foundation of Darwin's evolution. Taxon 58: 43-49.
67. Young, D.J. & Watson, I. 1971. The classification of the dicotyledons: a study of the upper levels of the hierarchy. Austral. J. Bot. 18: 387-433.