The 'scaled approach' in youth justice: Fools rush in...

Youth Justice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 44-60

  Sutherland, Alex ^a  

^a NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'Scaled approach'; Assessment; Policy; Risk led; Youth justice practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 63449134231     PISSN: 14732254     EISSN: 17476283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473225408101431     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Audit Commission (1998) Misspent Youth '98: The Challenge for Youth Justice, Briefing Paper. London: Audit Commission.
2. Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C. and Merrington, S. (2002) Validity and Reliability of Asset: Findings from the First Two Years of the Use of Asset. London: Youth Justice Board.
3. Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C. and Merrington, S. (2005) Further Development of Asset. London: Youth Justice Board.
4. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Sedo, B. and Coles, R. et al. (2004) Case Management in Manitoba Probation. Manitoba, Canada: Manitoba Department of Corrections.
5. BSC (2005) Delivering Risk-led Youth Offending Services. Confidential Report. London: Youth Justice Board.
6. Burnett, R. (1996) Fitting Supervision to Offenders: Assessment and Allocation Decisions in the Probation Service. Home Office Research Study 153. London: Home Office.
7. Burnett, R. (2004) 'One-to-one Ways of Promoting Desistance: In Search of an Evidence Base', in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
8. Case, S. (2007) 'Questioning the "Evidence" of Risk that Underpins Evidence-led Youth Justice Interventions', Youth Justice 7(2): 91-105.
9. Cooper, K., Sutherland, A. and Roberts, C. (2007) Keeping Young People Engaged: Improving Education, Training and Employment Opportunities for Serious and Persistent Young Offenders. London: Youth Justice Board.
10. England (Jnr), R.W. (1957) 'What is Responsible for Satisfactory Probation and Post-probation Outcome?', The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 47(6): 667-76.
11. Feilzer, M. and Hood, R. (2004) Difference or Discrimination? Minority Ethnic Young People in the Youth Justice System. London: Youth Justice Board.
12. Fitzgibbon, D.W.M. (2007) 'Risk Analysis and the New Practitioner: Myth or Reality?', Punishment & Society 9(1): 87-97.
13. Goldson, B. (2005) 'Editorial', Youth Justice 5(2): 75-6.
14. Haines, K. and Case, S. (2004) 'Promoting Prevention: A Multi-agency Initiative to Prevent Youth Offending Through Consultation in Swansea Schools', Youth Justice 4(2): 117-32.
15. Haslewood-Pócsik, I. and Skinns, J. (2000) Supervision Plans. Probation Studies Unit, ACE Practitioner Bulletin 2. Oxford: Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford.
16. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation (2004) Joint Inspection of Youth Offending Teams - First Phase. London: Home Office.
17. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation (2005a) Criteria for the Inspection of Youth Offending Teams in England. London: Home Office.
18. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation (2005 b) Joint Inspection of Youth Offending Teams - Annual Report 2004/2005. London: Home Office.
19. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation (2006) Joint Inspection of Youth Offending Teams - Annual Report 2005/2006. London: Home Office.
20. Innes, M. (2003) Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21. Kemshall, H. (1998) Risk in Probation Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. MacDonald, G. (1993) 'Implementing the Findings of Effectiveness Research in Probation', in C. Roberts (ed.) Improving Practice: Towards a Partnership between Information, Research and Practice. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Research and Information Conference of the Probation Service. Warwick: University of Warwick.
23. Mair, G., Cross, N. and Taylor, S. (2007) The Use and Impact of the Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. URL (accessed 16 January 2009) http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/ccjs/impact-community-order-2007.pdf
24. Merrington, S. (2001) Objectives, Intervention and Reducing Risk. Probation Studies Unit, ACE Practitioner Bulletin 3. Oxford: Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford.
25. Merrington, S. (2004) 'Assessment Tools in Probation: Their Development and Potential', in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds) (2004) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
26. Merrington, S. and Skinns, S. (2000) Using ACE to Profile Criminogenic Needs. Probation Studies Unit, ACE Practitioner Bulletin 1. Oxford: Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford.
27. Munro, E. (2005) 'A Systems Approach to Investigating Child Abuse Deaths', British Journal of Social Work 35: 531-46.
28. NACRO (2002) Enforcement in the Youth Justice System. Youth Crime Briefing. London: NACRO.
29. Pitts, J. (2001) 'Korrectional Karaoke: New Labour and the Zombification of Youth Justice', Youth Justice 1(2): 3-16.
30. Smith, R. (2003) Youth Justice: Ideas, Policy and Practice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
31. Sutherland, A., Merrington, S. and Baker, K. (2005) Youth Rehabilitation Order: An Exploration of Practice in Four YOTs Prior to Revisions to National Standards. Unpublished. London: Youth Justice Board.
32. Wikström, P.-O.H. (2007) 'In Search of Causes and Explanations of Crime', in R.D. King and E. Wincup (eds) Doing Research on Crime and Justice, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Wilcox, A. (2003) 'Evidence Based Youth Justice: Some Valuable Lessons from an Evaluation for the Youth Justice Board', Youth Justice 3(1): 19-33.
34. Youth Justice Board (2003) Assessment, Planning Interventions and Supervision: Reader for Certificate in Effective Practice. London: Youth Justice Board.
35. Youth Justice Board (2004a) National Standards for Youth Justice. London: Youth Justice Board. AvHilable from: http://www.yjb.gov.uk/ Publications/Resources/Downloads/NatStandYJS2004.pdf
36. Youth Justice Board (2004b) Assessment, Planning Interventions and Supervision: Key Elements of Effective Practice. London: Youth Justice Board.
37. Youth Justice Board (2005) National Standards Audit, unpublished. London: Youth Justice Board.
38. Youth Justice Board (2006a) Risk-led Approaches to Youth Justice - Youth Justice Service Managers Conference. London: Youth Justice Board. URL (accessed 16 January 2009) http://www.yjb.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ BE79015C-5A19-4654-8858-C5196CAC00A1/0/RiskLedApproachesWorkshop.ppt
39. Youth Justice Board (2006b) Asset Guidance Folder. London: Youth Justice Board.
40. Youth Justice Board (2007a) Youth Justice: The Scaled Approach, pre-consultation review. London: Youth Justice Board.
41. Youth Justice Board (2007b) Asset Core Profile. London: Youth Justice Board.
42. Youth Justice Board (2007c) Youth Justice Annual Statistics 2005/06. London: Youth Justice Board.