Influence of diet on the proteome of Drosophila melanogaster as assessed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: The hamburger effect revisited

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 244-250

  Culwell, Thomas F ^a   Thulin, Craig D ^b   Merrell, Karen J ^a   Graves, Steven W ^a  

^a Brigham Young University   (United States)

^b UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2D gel electrophoresis; Diet; Drosophila melanogaster; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; PROTEOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DIET; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; FEMALE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MALE; METABOLISM; PROTEOMICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DIET; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; ETHANOL; FEMALE; MALE; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

EID: 63449117216     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Banks RE, Stanley AJ, Cairns DA, Barrett JH, Clarke P, Thompson D, et al. Influences of blood sample processing on low-molecular-weight proteome identified by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2005;51:1637-1649.
2. Pilny R, Bouchal P, Borilova S, Ceskova P, Zaloudik J, Vyzula R, et al. Surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight mass spectrometry reveals significant artifacts in serum obtained from clot activator-containing collection devices. Clin Chem 2006;52:2115-2116.
3. Karsan A, Eigl BJ, Flibotte S, Gelmon K, Switzer P, Hassell P, et al. Analytical and preanalytical biases in serum proteomic pattern analysis for breast cancer diagnosis. Clin Chem 2005;51:1525-1528.
4. Baggerly KA, Morris JS, Edmonson SR, Coombes KR. Signal in noise: Evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005:97:307-309.
5. Davis SN, Cherrington AD. The hormonal and metabolic responses to prolonged hypoglycemia. J Lab Clin Med 1993;121:21-31.
6. Garber K. Debate rages over proteomic patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004:96:816-818.
7. Hsieh SY, Chen RK, Pan YH, Lee HL. Systematical evaluation of the effects of sample collection procedures on low-molecular-weight serum/plasma proteome profiling. Proteomics 2006;6:3189-3198.
8. Brunner E, Ahrens CH, Mohanty S, Baetschmann H, Loevenich S, Potthast F, et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:576-583.
9. Chen Z, Southwick K, Thulin CD. Initial analysis of the phosphoproteome of Chinese hamster ovary cells using electrophoresis. J Biomol Tech 2004;15:249-256.
10. Merrell K, Southwick K, Graves SW, Esplin MS, Lewis NE, Thulin CD. Analysis of low-abundance, low-molecular-weight serum proteins using mass spectrometry. J Biomol Tech 2004;15:238-248.
11. http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu, accessed March 3, 2008.
12. Fry JD, Bahnck CM, Mikucki M, Phadnis N, Slattery WC. Dietary ethanol mediates selection on aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2004;44:275-283.
13. Albrethsen J, Bogebo R, Olsen J, Raskov H, Gammeltoft S. Preanalytical and analytical variation of surface-enhanced laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of human serum. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1243-52.
14. Nelsestuen GL, Zhang Y, Martinez MB, Key NS, Jilma B, Verneris M, et al. Plasma protein profiling: Unique and stable features of individuals. Proteomics 2005;5: 4012-4024.
15. Molloy MP, Brzezinski EE, Hang J, McDowell MT, Van Bogelen RA. Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2003;3:1912-1919.
16. Semmes OJ, Feng Z, Adam BL, Banez LL, Bigbee WL, Campos D, et al. Evaluation of serum protein profiling by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the detection of prostate cancer: I. Assessment of platform reproducibility. Clin Chem 2005;51:102-112.