Neural modeling of flow rendering effectiveness

APGV 2008 - Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 171-177

  Pineo, Daniel ^a   Ware, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contour perception; Flow visualization; Perceptual theory; Visual cortex; Visualization

Indexed keywords

CONTOUR INTEGRATIONS; CONTOUR PERCEPTION; CORTICAL MODELS; MODEL YIELDS; NEURAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODELS; PATH TRACINGS; PERCEPTUAL THEORY; PRIMARY VISUAL CORTICES; RELATIVE STRENGTHS; RENDERING METHODS; TWO-STAGE MODELS; VISUAL AREAS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; VISUALIZATION METHODS;

ADVECTION; FLOW VISUALIZATION;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 63449108559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1394281.1394313     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Blake, R. and Holopigan, K. 1985. Orientation of selectivity in cats and humans assessed by masking. Vision Research 23, 1: 1459-1467.
2. Cabral, B., and Ledom, L. 1993. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 93, 263-272.
3. Daugman, J. 1985. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency and orientation optimized by two-dimensional cortical filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A/2: 1160-1169.
4. Elder, J.; Krupnik, A.; Johnston, L., 2003. Contour grouping with prior models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25, 6, 661-674.
5. Field, D., Hayes, A., and Hess, R. 1993. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field". Vision Research 33, 2, 173-193.
6. Hubel, D., and Wiesel, T. 1962. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol., 160, 106-154.
7. Hubel, D., and Wiesel, T. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol, 195, 215-243.
8. Janiszewski, C. 1998. The influence of display characteristics on visual search exploratory search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 290-301.
9. Kirby, R., Marmanis, H., and Laidlaw, D. 1999. Visulizing multivalued data from 2D incompressible flows using concepts from painting. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization. 333-340.
10. Laidlaw, D., Kirby, R., Davidson, S., Miller, T., Silva, M., Warren, W., and Tarr, M. 2001. Quantitative Comparative Evaluation of 2D Vector Field Visualization Methods. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2001, 143-150
11. Li, Z. 1998. A Neural Model of Contour integration in the primary visual cortex. Neural Computation, 10 903-940.
12. Lund, N. 2001. Attention and Pattern Recognition, Routledge.
13. Singer, W., and Gray, C. 1995. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neuroscience, 18, 555-586.
14. Turk, G. and Banks, D. 1996. Image guided streamline placement. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 96, 453-460.
15. Mostafawy, S. Kermani, O., Lubatschowski, H. 1997. Virtual Eye: Retinal Image Visualization of the Human Eye, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 17, no. 1, 8-12
16. Ware, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufman.
17. Ware, C. 2008. Toward a perceptual theory of flow visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(2) 6-11.