![]() |
Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-54
|
Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry
|
Author keywords
Closed chamber; Evaporimetry; Open chamber; TEWL
|
Indexed keywords
AIR CURRENTS;
CLOSED CHAMBER;
CLOSED CHAMBERS;
EVAPORIMETRY;
HIGH WATER;
OPEN CHAMBER;
SEALED CHAMBERS;
TEST CONDITION;
TEWL;
TRANSEPIDERMAL WATER LOSS;
VERTICAL POSITIONS;
WATER LOSS;
WATER LOSS RATES;
CEMENTS;
HYDRATES;
INSTRUMENT TESTING;
MOTOR BOATS;
SKIN;
WATER VAPOR;
ACCURACY;
ARTICLE;
CLOSED CHAMBER EVAPORIMETRY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EVAPORATION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEASUREMENT;
OPEN CHAMBER EVAPORIMETRY;
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM;
SKIN WATER LOSS;
WATER VAPOR;
BODY WATER;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EQUIPMENT;
EVALUATION;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METABOLISM;
METHODOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SKIN ABSORPTION;
SKIN TEST;
THERMOREGULATION;
WATER;
BODY WATER;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS;
HUMANS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SKIN ABSORPTION;
SKIN TESTS;
WATER;
WATER LOSS, INSENSIBLE;
|
EID: 63449104130
PISSN: 0909752X
EISSN: 16000846
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00334.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (12)
|