Potamogetonaceae fossil fruits from the tertiary of Patagonia, Argentina

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 419-428

  Gandolfo, Maria A ^a   Del C Zamaloa, Maria ^b   Cúneo, Néstor R ^c   Archangelsky, Ana ^d  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^c MUSEO PALEONTOLÓGICO EGIDIO FERUGLIO   (Argentina)

^d MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Argentina; Fossil; Fruits; Infructescences; Monocots; Pollen; Potamogetonaceae

Indexed keywords

EOCENE; FOSSIL RECORD; FRUIT; MONOCOTYLEDON; NORTHERN HEMISPHERE; OUTCROP; PALYNOLOGY; PLIOCENE;

PATAGONIA; SOUTH AMERICA;

LILIOPSIDA; POTAMOGETONACEAE;

EID: 63449100622     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/595290     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aalto M 1970 Potamogetonaceae fruits. 1. Recent and subfossil endocarps of the Fennoscandian species. Acta Bot Fenn 88:1-85.
2. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) II 2003 An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-436.
3. Archangelsky A, MC Zamaloa 2003 Primeros resultados palinológicos del Paleógeno del sector oriental de la Sierra La Colonia, Provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Rev Mus Argentino Cienc Nat, NS, 5:119-123.
4. Barreda V, L Palazzesi 2007 Patagonian vegetation turnovers during the Paleogene-Early Neogene: origin of arid-adapted floras. Bot Rev 73:31-50.
5. Batten DJ 1996 Colonial Chlorococcales. Pages 191-203 in J Jansonius, DC McGregor, eds. Palynology: principles and applications. Vol 1. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Dallas.
6. Bůžek C, F Holý 1981 Fruits of halophilous water plants (Limnocarpus C. Reid, Potamogetonaceae Dumortier) from the Cypris Formation of the Cheb and Sokolov basins. Paleontologie 24:163-175.
7. Collinson ME 1982 A reassessment of fossil Potamogetonaceae fruits with description of new material from Saudi Arabia. Tertiary Res 4: 83-104.
8. Czaja A 2003 Paläokarpologische Untersuchungen von Taphozönosen des Unter- und Mittelmiozäns aus dem Braunkohlentagebau Berzdorf/Oberlausitz (Schasen). Palaeontogr Abt B 265:1-148.
9. Daghlian CP 1981 A review of the fossil record of monocotyledons. Bot Rev 47:517-555.
10. Dahlgren RMT, HT Clifford, PF Yao 1985 The families of the monocotyledons. Springer, Berlin.
11. Davis JI, DW Stevenson, G Petersen, O Seberg, LM Campbell, JV Freudenstein, DH Goldman, et al 2004 A phylogeny of the monocots, as inferred from rbcL sind atpA sequence variation, and a comparison of methods for calculating jackknife and bootstrap values. Syst Bot 29: 467-510.
12. Dorofeev PI 1968 Fruit of the genus Limnocarpus C. Reid from the Paleogene of the USSR. Dokl Acad Sci USSR Earth Sci Sect 180: 217-220.
13. Doyle JA 1973 The monocotyledons: their evolution and comparative biology. V. Fossil evidence on early evolution of the monocotyledons. Q Rev Biol 48:399-413.
14. Flynn JJ, CC Swisher 1995 Cenozoic South American land mammal ages: correlation to global geochronologies. Geochronol Time Scales Global Stratigr Correlat SEPM Spec Publ 54:317-333.
15. Fowler K 1971 A new species of Aglaoreidia Erdtm. from the Eocene of southern England. Pollen Spores 13:135-147.
16. Friis EM 1985 Angiosperm fruits and seeds from the Middle Miocene of Jutland (Denmark). K Dan Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr 24: 1-165.
17. Gandolfo MA, KC Nixon, WL Crepet 2000 Monocotyledons: a review of their Early Cretaceous record. Pages 44-52 in K Wilson, D Morrison, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons. CSIRO, Sydney.
18. Greenwood DR, JG Conran 2000 The Australian Cretaceous and Tertiary monocot fossil record. Pages 52-59 in K Wilson, D Morrison, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons. CSIRO, Sydney.
19. Gregor HJ 1982 Die jungtertiären Floren Süddautschlands. Ferdinan Enke, Stuttgart.
20. Haynes RR 1978 The Potamogetonaceae in southern United States. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 59:170-191.
21. Haynes RR, DH Les, LB Holm-Nielsen 1998 Potamogetonaceae. Pages 408-415 in K Kubitzki, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Flowering plants, monocotyledons, Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Vol 4. Springer, Hamburg.
22. Herendeen PS, PR Crane 1995 The fossil history of the Monocotyledons. Pages 1-21 in PJ Rudall, PJ Cribb, DF Cutler, CJ Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
23. Les DH, MA Cleland, M Waycott 1997 Phylogenetic studies in Alismatidae. II. Evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Syst Bot 22:443-463.
24. Les DH, DK Garvin, CF Wimpee 1993 Phylogenetic studies in the monocot subclass Alismatideae: evidence for a reappraisal of the aquatic order Najadales. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:304-314.
25. Lindqvist C, J De Laet, RR Haynes, L Aagesen, BR Kenner, VA Albert 2006 Molecular phylogenetics of an aquatic lineage, Potamogetonaceae. Cladistics 22:568-588.
26. Mabberly DJ 1987 The plant-book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Machin J 1971 Plant microfossils from the Tertiary deposits of the Isle of Wight. New Phytol 70:851-872.
28. Madden RH 2004 Geochronology of the Sarmiento Formation at Gran Barranca. XX. Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontología de Vertebrados (La Plata). Abstract. Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Buenos Aires.
29. Mai DH 1985 Development of the water plant and swamp associations of Europe from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Flora 176: 449-511.
30. -1999 Die untermiozänen Floren aus der Spremberger Folge und dem. 2. Flözhorizont in der Lausitz. Teil I. Farnpflanzen, Koniferen und Monokotyledonen. Palaeontogr Abt B 250:1-76.
31. - 2000 Die mittelmiozänen und obermiozänen Floren aus der Meuroer und Raunoer Folge in der Lausitz. Teil I. Farnpflanzen, Koniferen und Monokotyledonen. Palaeontogr Abt B 256: 1-68.
32. Melendi DL, LH Scafati, W Volkheimer 2003 Palynostratigraphy of the Paleogene Huitrera Formation in N-W Patagonia, Argentina. Neues Jahrb Geol Palaeontol Abh 228:205-273.
33. Mildenhall DC, YM Crosbie 1979 Some porate pollen from the upper Tertiary of New Zealand. NZJ Geol Geophys 22:499-508.
34. Negru AG 1968 Fossil fruit of Ruppiaceae and Patamogetonaceae from the Buglovian deposits of Moldavia. Bot Zh 53:1300-1305. (In Russian.)
35. Ollivier-Pierre MF 1980 Etude palynologique (spores et pollens) de gisements paleogenes due Massif Armoricain. Stratigr Paleogeogr Mem Soc Geol Miner Bretagne 25:1-239.
36. Reid C 1898 On Limnocarpus si new genus of fossil plants from the Tertiary deposits of Hampshire. Bot J Linn Soc 33:464-466.
37. Saporta G 1888 Dernières adjonctions à la flora fossile d'Aix-enProvence. Ann Sci Nat Bot 7:1-104.
38. Spence DHN, TR Milburn, M Ndawula-Senyimba, E Roberts 1971
39. Fruit biology and germination of two tropical Potamogetón species. New Phytol 70:197-212.
40. Stockey R 2006 The fossil record of basal monocots. Pages 91-106 in JT Columbus, EA Friar, JM Porter, LM Prince, MG Simpson, eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution (excluding Poales). Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA.
41. Teodoridis V 2007 Revision of Potamogetón fossils from the Most Basin and their palaeoecological significance (Early Miocene, Czech Republic). Bull Geosci 84:409-418.
42. Traverse A 1980 Paleopalynology. Unwin Hyman, London.
43. Tur NM 1982 Revisión del género Potamogetón L. en la Argentina. Darwiniana 24:214-265.
44. van Geel B, HR Grenfell 1996 Spores of Zygnemataceae. Pages 173-179 in J Jansonius, DC McGregor, eds. Palynology: principles and applications. Vol 1. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Dallas.
45. Velichkevich FY, MA Lesiak 1996 Fossil Potamogetón species of Mizerna. Acta Palaeobot 36:79-95.
46. Zhao LC, ME Collinson, CS Li 2004 Fruits and seeds of Ruppia (Potamogetonaceae) from the Pliocene of Yushe Basin, Shanxi, northern China and their ecological implications. Bot J Linn Soc 145:317-329.