Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 96-101

  Karaoǧlanoǧlu, Serpil ^a   Akgül, Nilgün ^a   Özdabak, Hatice Nur ^a   Akgül, Hayati Murat ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Glass ionomer cement; Polyacid modified composite resin; Surface protection

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CAMPHOR; COLORING AGENT; COMPOMER; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; IONOFIL U; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PROTECT IT; PROTECT-IT; PYROXYLIN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND; SULFONAMIDE; TOLUENE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; VITREMER;

ABSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ABSORPTION; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CAMPHOR; COLLODION; COLORING AGENTS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SULFONAMIDES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOLUENE;

EID: 63449097071     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.96     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Crisp S, Wilson AD. Reaction in glass-ionomer cements: I. Decomposition of the powder. J Dent Res 1974; 53: 1408-1413.
2. th ed, Mosby Inc., St. Louis, 2002, pp.197-284.
3. Upadhya NP, Kishore G. Glass ionomer cement - the different generations. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005; 18: 158-165.
4. Wilson AD. Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 438-446.
5. Wilson AD, Paddon JM, Crisp S. The hydration of dental cements. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1065-1071.
6. Mathis RS, Ferracane JL. Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 355-358.
7. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 587-589.
8. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 64-69.
9. Wilson AD. Resin modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 425-429.
10. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 72-74.
11. Yap AUJ, Tan S, Teh TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part I. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 117-123.
12. Van Dijken JWV. 3-year clinical evaluation of compomer, a resin modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 195-198.
13. De Trey/Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany. Technical information.
14. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RG, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 448-453.
15. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. In vitro surface treatment and water balance of resin-modified glass-ionomers. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 475 (Abstract No. 599).
16. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of glass-ionomer restorative materials. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 109 (Abstract No. 778).
17. McLean JW. Clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1992; 5: 184-190.
18. Serra MC, Navarro MFL, Freitas SFT, Carvalho RM, Cury JA, Retief DH. Glass-ionomer cement surface protection. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 203-206.
19. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 309-314.
20. Nicholson JW, McLean JW. A preliminary report on the effect of storage in water on the properties of commercial light-cured glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1992; 173: 98-101.
21. Hondrum SO. Storage stability of dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 464-468.
22. Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resinmodified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 186-190.
23. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1995; 15: 71-78.
24. Yap A, Lee CM. Water sorption and solubility of resin-modified polyalkenoate cements. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 310-314.
25. Anstice HM, Nicholson JW. Studies on the structure of light-cured glass-ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992; 3: 447-451.
26. Kanchanavasita W, Pearson GJ, Anstice HM. Influence of humidity on dimensional stability of a range of ion-leachable cements. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 921-929.
27. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 351-358.
28. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Torii M, Ebisu S. Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 132-137.
29. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 21-32.
30. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 529-539.
31. Yap AUJ. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: a comparison of water sorption characteristics. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1897-1900.
32. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1396-1401.
33. Mount GJ. Glass-ionomer cements: Past, present and future. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 82-90.
34. Beltrao HCP, Manfio AR, Navarro MFL, Souza MHS. Clinical evaluation of conventional versus light-cured restorative glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 65 (Abstract No. 383).
35. Small ICB, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK. Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: An in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 545-550.
36. Jevnikar P, Sersa I, Sepe A, Jarh O, Funduk N. Effect of surface coating on water migration into resin-modified glass ionomer cements: a magnetic resonance micro-imaging study. Magn Reson Medicine 2000; 44: 686-691.
37. Ribeiro AP, Serra MC, Paulillo LA, Rodrigues Junior AL. Effectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 427-431.
38. Earl MSA, Mount GJ, Hume WR. The effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the surface of a glass ionomer cement: II. Austral Dent J 1989; 34: 326-329.
39. Watson TF, Banerjee A. Effectiveness of glassionomer surface protection treatments: a scanning optical microscope study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1993; 2: 85-90.
40. Hotta M, Hirukawa H, Yamamoto K. Effect of coating materials on restorative glass-ionomer cement surface. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 57-61.
41. Hotta M, Hirukawa H. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 42-46.
42. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 480-488.
43. Cefaly DFG, Seabra BGM, Tapety CMC, Taga EM, Valera F, Navarro MFL. Effectiveness of surface protection of resin modified glass-ionomer cements evaluated spectrophotometrically. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 401-405.