Using ordinal logistic regression to evaluate the performance of laser-Doppler predictions of burn-healing time

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Baker, Rose D ^a   Weinand, Christian ^b   Jeng, James C ^b   Hoeksema, Henk ^c   Monstrey, Stan ^c   Pape, Sarah A ^d   Spence, Robert ^e   Wilson, David ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^d ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; BODY SURFACE; BOOTSTRAPPING; BURN; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN BLOOD FLOW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND CARE; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SKIN; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; VASCULARIZATION;

BURNS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEX FACTORS; SKIN; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; TIME FACTORS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 63449089115     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-11     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A comparison of laser Doppler imaging with other measurement techniques to assess burn depth. S Hemington-Gorse, J Wound Care 2005 14 151 153 15835224
2. Modalities for the assessment of burn wound depth. L Devgan S Bhat S Aylward S RJ, J Burns Wounds 2006 5 e2 16921415
3. A critical evaluation of the clinimetrics of laser Doppler as a method of burn assessment in clinical practice. J Chatterjee, J Burn Care Res 2006 27 123 130 16566554
4. Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential. S Monstrey H Hoeksema J Verbelen A Pirayesh P Blondeel, Burns 2008 34 761 769 10.1016/j.burns.2008.01.009 18511202
5. An audit of the use of laser-Doppler Imaging (LDI) in the assessment of burns of intermediate depth. S Pape C Skouras P Byrne, Burns 2001 27 233 239 10.1016/S0305-4179(00)00118-2 11311516
6. Laser Doppler imaging determines need for excision and grafting in advance of clinical judgment a prospective blinded trial. JC Jeng A Bridgeman L Shivnan P Thornton H Alam T Clarke K Jablonski M Jordan, Burns 2003 29 665 670 10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00078-0 14556723
7. Laser Doppler imaging prediction of burn wound outcome in children. A Holland H Martin D Cass, Burns 2002 28 11 17 10.1016/S0305-4179(01)00064-X 11834324
8. Laser Doppler imaging of paediatric burns burn wound outcome can be predicted independent of clinical examination. E La Hei A Holland H Martin, Burns 2006 32 550 553 10.1016/j.burns.2005.11.014 16730128
9. A Stuart K Ord, Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics London: Edward Arnold 5 1991 2
10. Improved accuracy of burn wound assessment using laser Doppler. EK Yeong R Mann M Goldberg L Engrav D Heimbach, Journal of trauma-injury infection and critical care 1996 40 956 961 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00015
11. B JP H DN, Colour Atlas of Burn Care Harcourt Publishers 2001
12. Predictive models for mortality and length of hospital stay in an Egyptian burns centre. A Attia A Reda A Mandil M Arafa N Massoud, East Mediterr Health J 2000 6 1055 61 12197328
13. Endogenous anabolic hormones and hypermetabolism effect of trauma and gender differences. M Jeschke R Barrow R Mlcak D Herndon, Ann Surg 2005 241 759 767; discussion 767-8 15849511 10.1097/01.sla.0000161028.43338.cd
14. Incidence of mortality in boys and girls after severe thermal burns. R Barrow D Herndon, Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990 170 295 298 2321118
15. An evaluation of risk factors for mortality after burn trauma and the identification of gender-dependent differences in outcomes. G O'Keefe J Hunt G Purdue, Journal of the American college of surgeons 2001 192 153 160 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00785-7 11220714
16. Gender differences in mortality following burn injury. GJ McGwin R George J Cross D Rei3 I Chaudry Lr Rue, Shock 2002 18 311 315 10.1097/00024382- 200210000-00004 12392273
17. The association between sex and mortality among burn patients as modified by age. R George GJ McGwin M Schwacha J Metzger J Cross I Chaudry Lr Rue, J Burn Care Rehabil 2005 26 416 421 10.1097/01.bcr.0000176888.44949.87 16151287
18. Sex differences in mortality after burn injury results of analysis of the National Burn Repository of the American Burn Association. J Kerby GJ McGwin R George J Cross I Chaudry Lr Rue, J Burn Care Res 2006 27 452 456 16819347
19. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. R Bender U Grouven, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1997 31 546 551 9429194
20. A Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, Inc 2 2002
21. Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). P McCullagh, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1980 42 109 142
22. P McCullagh J Nelder, Generalized Linear Models London: Chapman & Hall 2 1989
23. Optimal discriminant analysis for ordinal responses. J Coste E Walter D Wasserman A Venot, Statistics in Medicine 1997 16 561 569 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0258(19970315)16:5<561::AID-SIM431>3.0.CO;2-C 9089963
24. Improving model robustness with bootstrapping -Application to optimal discriminant analysis for ordinal responses (ODAO). G Le Teuff C Quantin A Venot E Walter J Coste, Methods of Information in Medicine 2005 44 704 711 16400380
25. Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression. S Greenland, Statistics in Medicine 1994 13 1665 1677 10.1002/sim.4780131607 7973242
26. Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. C Ananth D Kleinbaum, International Journal of Epidemiology 1997 26 1323 1333 10.1093/ije/26.6.1323 9447413
27. Ordinal regression models for epidemiologic data. B Armstrong M Sloan, American Journal of Epidemiology 1989 129 191 204 2910061
28. FJ Harrell, Regression Modeling Strategies New York: Springer 2001
29. Classification efficiency of multinomial logistic regression relative to ordinal logistic regression. M Campbell A Donner, Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989 84 587 591 10.2307/2289946
30. The Impact of Heterogeneity in Individual Frailty on the Dynamics of Mortality. J Vaupel K Manton E Stallard, Demography 1979 16 439 454 10.2307/2061224 510638
31. A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. D Hedeker R Gibbons, Biometrics 1994 50 933 944 10.2307/2533433 7787006
32. Numerical Algorithms Group Fortran Library - Supporting Documentation. NAG Plc, http://www.nag.co.uk/numeric/FL/FLdocumentation.asp
33. B Efron R Tibshirani, An introduction to the Bootstrap New York: Chapman & Hall 1993
34. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. E Steyerberg FJ Harrell G Borsboon M Eijkemans Y Vergouwe J Habbema, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2001 54 774 781 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00341-9 11470385
35. D Cox E Snell, The analysis of Binary Data London: Chapman and Hall 1989
36. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. N Nagelkerke, Biometrika 1991 78 691 692 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
37. E Edgington P Onghena, Randomization Tests New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC 4 2007
38. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small and moderate-sized datasets. DM Potter, Statistics in Medicine 2005 24 693 708 10.1002/sim.1931 15515134