Beyond the public meeting: Building a field-based participatory GIS for land use planning in Monongalia county, West Virginia

Collaborative Geographic Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 43-65

  Hawthorne, Timothy L ^a   Dougherty, Michael ^a,b   Elmes, Gregory ^a,c,d   Fletcher, Christopher ^a   McCusker, Brent ^a   Pinto, Marta ^e   Weiner, Daniel ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b West Virginia University Extension Service   (United States)

^c West Virginia State GIS Technical Center   (United States)

^d International Geographic Union Commission on Geographical Information Science   (United States)

^e CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PORTUGAL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63449084860     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Abbot, J., Chambers, R., Dunn, C., Harris, T.M., de Merode, E., Porter, G., Townsend, J., & Weiner, D. (1998). Participatory GIS: Opportunity or oxymoron. PLA Notes, 33, 27-34.
2. Aitken, S. C., & Michel, S. (1995). Who contrives the "real" in GIS? Geographic information, planning and critical theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 22, 22(1), 17-29.
3. Al-Kodmany, K. (2000). Extending geographic information systems to meet neighborhood planning needs: The case of three Chicago communities. URISA Journal, 12(3), 19-37.
4. Brody, S., Godschalk, D., & Burby, R. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245-263.
5. Burby, R. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33-49.
6. Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (2000). Accessing geographical information systems over the World Wide Web: Improving public participation in environmental decision-making. Information Infrastructure and Policy 6, 157-170.
7. Chrisman, N. R. (1987). Design of geographic information systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(10), 1367-1370.
8. Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
9. Crampton, J. (1995). The ethics of GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 84-89.
10. Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 421-434.
11. Docherty, I., Goodland, R., & Paddison, R. (2001). Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2225-2250.
12. Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 50-82). Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
13. Edney, M. H. (1991). Strategies for maintaining the democratic nature of geographic information systems. Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences.
14. Elmes, G., Challig, H., Karigomba, W., McCusker, B., & Weiner, D. (2004b). Local knowledge doesn't grow on trees: Community-integrated geographic information systems and rural community self-definition. In P. F. Fisher (Ed.), Spatial Data Handling. Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (pp. 29-40). Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.
15. Elmes, G., Epstein, E., Shepard, E., & Tulloch, D. (2004a). GIS and society. In R. McMaster & L. Usery (Eds.), Research challenges in GIS. FL: CRC Press.
16. Elwood, S. (2002). The impacts of GIS use in Minneapolis. In W. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 77-88). London: Taylor and Francis.
17. Fischler, R. (2000). Case studies of planners at work. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(2), 184-195.
18. Hanna, K. (2000). The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information: A case study. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(4), 398-410.
19. Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization and community-integrated GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 67-76.
20. Harris, T. M., Weiner, D., Warner, T., & Levin, R. (1995). Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS: Redressing South Africa's historical political ecology. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 196-222). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Hawthorne, T. L. (2005). Participatory GIS for growth management in the Cheat Lake planning district of Monongalia County, WV. Master's Thesis: West Virginia University, Morgantown.
22. Innes, J., & Booher, D. (1999). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 9-26.
23. Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). GIS-supported collaborative decision making: Results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(1), 48-70.
24. Laurian, L. (2004). Public participation in environmental decision making. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 53-66.
25. Leitner, H., McMaster, R. B., Elwood, S., McMaster, S., & Sheppard, E. (2002). Models for making GIS available to community organizations: Dimensions of difference and appropriateness. In W. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 37-52). London: Taylor and Francis.
26. Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of GIS. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Pickles, J. (1999). Arguments, debates, and dialogues: The GIS-social theory debate and concerns for alternatives. In M. G. Longley, D. Maguire, & D. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, management, and applications. New York: John Wiley.
28. Sheppard, E. (1993). GIS and society: Ideal and reality. Friday Harbor Conference, WA.
29. Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. APA Journal, 66(3), 279-294.
30. URISA. (2002, July 21-23). Conference Proceedings of the "1st Annual PPGIS Conference" sponsored by the Urban and Regional Information Association. Rutgers University School of Planning and Public Safety, New Bruswick, NJ.
31. URISA. (2003, July 20-22). Conference Proceedings of the "2nd Annual PPGIS Conference" sponsored by the Urban and Regional Information Association. Portland University, Portland, OR.
32. URISA. (2004, July 18-20). Conference Proceedings of the "3rd Annual PPGIS Conference" sponsored by the Urban and Regional Information Association. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
33. Ventura, S.J., Niemann, B.J., Chenoweth, R.E., & Sutphin, T P. (2002). GIS-enhanced land use planning in Dane county, Wisconsin. In W. Craig, T.M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
34. Ward-Schofield, J. (1993). Increasing the generalisability of qualitative research. In M. Hammersly (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practic (pp. 200-225). Open University Press.
35. Winchester, H. (2000). Qualitative research and its place in human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 1-22). Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.