Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Wright, Melanie C ^a   Taekman, J M ^a   Endsley, M R ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SA Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPREHENSION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SITUATION AWARENESS GLOBAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE; SKILL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK;

AWARENESS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; INSERVICE TRAINING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT SIMULATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 6344293994     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.009951     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Wilson JR, Corlett EN. Evaluation of human work: a practical ergonomics methodology. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1990.
2. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, McIlroy J, et al. Simulation technology: a comparison of experiential and visual learning for undergraduate medical students. Anesthesiology 2002;96:10-16.
3. Merry AF, Webster CS, Weller J, et al. Evaluation in an anaesthetic simulator of a prototype of a new drug administration system designed to reduce error. Anaesthesia 2002;57:256-63.
4. Schwid HA, Rooke A, Carline J, et al. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multi-institutional study. Anesthesiology 2002;97:1434-44.
5. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-64.
6. Zhang Y, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, et al. Effects of integrated graphical displays on situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Cognition, Technology & Work 2002;4:82-90.
7. Syroid ND, Agutter J, Drews FA, et al. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology 2002;96:565-74.
8. Endsley MR. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995;37:65-84.
9. Herndon CN, Weinger MB, Smith BE, et al. Use of task analysis to evaluate the effects of fatigue on performance during simulated anesthesia cases. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1180A.
10. Byrne AJ, Sellen AJ, Jones JG. Errors on anaesthetic record charts as a measure of anaesthetic performance during simulated critical incidents. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:58-62.
11. Endsley MR, Kiris EO. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of cantrol in automation. Hum Factors 1995;37:381-94.
12. Chopra V, Gesink BJ, de Jong J, et al. Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance? Br J Anaesth 1994;73:293-7.
13. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, et al. Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Anesthesiology 1998;89:8-36.
14. Marshall RL, Smith JS, German PJ, et al. Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 2001;51:17-21.
15. Gaba DM. Two examples of how to evaluate the impact of new approaches to teaching. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1-2.
16. Endsley MR. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1988:97-101.
17. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995;37:32-64.
18. Endsley MR. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000:3-32.
19. Klein G. Analysis of situation awareness from critical incident reports. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000:51-71.
20. Endsley MR. Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1990:41-5.
21. Venturino M, Hamilton WL, Dvorchak SR. Performance-based measures of merit for tactical situation awareness. Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD, 1989, 4/1-4/5.
22. Bell RH, Lyon DR. Using observer ratings to assess situation awareness. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000:129-46.
23. Selcon SJ, Taylor RM, Koritsas E. Workload or situational awareness? TLX vs SART for aerospace systems design evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1991:57-61.
24. Collier SG, Folleso K. SACRI: a measure of situation awareness for nuclear power plant control rooms. In: Garland DJ, Endsley MR, eds. Experimental analysis and measurement of situation awareness. Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle University Press, 1995:115-22.
25. Endsley MR. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON). New York: IEEE, 1988:789-95.
26. Endsley MR, Mogford R, Allendoerfer K, et al. Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, worklood, and situation awareness: a preliminary investigation of changes in locus of control using existing technology. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J Hugnes Technical Center, 1997.
27. Wickens CD. Engineering psychology and human performance. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman and Company, 1984.
28. Gaba DM. Human error in dynamic medical domains. In: Bogner MS, eds. Human error in medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.
29. Endsley MR. Designing for situation awareness in complex systems. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Symbiosis of Humans, Artifacts and Environment. Kyoto, Japan, 2001.
30. Taylor RM. Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Situational awareness in aerospace operations. Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: NATO-AGARD, 1990, 3/1-3/17.
31. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Small SD. Situation awareness in anesthesiology. Hum Factors 1995;37:20-31.
32. Endsley MR. Direct measurement of situation awareness: validity and use of SAGAT. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000:147-74.
33. Sorter NB, Woods DD. Situation awareness: a critical but ill defined phenomenon. Int J Aviat Psychol 1991;1:45-57.
34. Endsley MR. A methodology for the objective measurement of situation awareness. Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD, 1990, 1/1-1/9.
35. Bolstad CA, Endsley MR. Single versus dual scale range display investigation. Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corporation, 1990.
36. Endsley MR. Final report: situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission. Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corporation, 1989.
37. Northrop Corporation. Tactical simulation 2 test report: addendum 1 situation awareness test results. Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corporation, 1988.
38. Hogg DN, Tarralba B, Volden FS. A situation awareness methodology for the evaluation of process control systems: studies of feasibility and the implication of use. Storefjell, Norway: OECD Halden Reactor Project, 1993.
39. Endsley MR, Sollenberger R, Nakata A, et al. Situation awareness in air traffic control: enhanced displays for advanced operations. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J Hughes Technical Center, 1999.
40. Endsley MR, Garland DJ, Shook RWC, et al. Situation awareness problems in general aviation. Marietta, GA: SA Technologies, Inc, 2000.
41. Bolstad CA, Endsley MR, Howell C, et al General aviation pilot training for situation awareness: an evaluation. 45th annual meeting or the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Manica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002.
42. Strater LD, Endsley MR, Pleban RJ, et al Measures of platoon leader situation awareness in virtual decision making exercises. Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute, 2001.
43. Strater LG, Reynolds JP, Faulkner LA, et al. PC-based tools to improve infantry situation awareness. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004.
44. Cooke NJ. Cognitive task analysis for teams, CTA resource on-line seminar 2002. http://www.ctaresource.com.
45. Cooke NJ, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, et al. Measuring team knowledge. Hum Factors 2000;42:151-73.
46. Murray DJ. Technical novelty or innovation in education. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1-2.