Identifying core documents with a multiple evidence relevance filter

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 385-394

  Christoffersen, Mikkel ^a  

^a Danish Ctr Eval Hlth Technol A   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344285435     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045116.51534.5c     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. CASE, D. O., HIGGINS, G. M. (2002), How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 635-645.
2. CHRISTENSEN, F. H., INGWERSEN, P. (1997), Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: Fundamental methodological issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (3): 205-217.
3. FRANDSEN, T. F. (2003), Simplifying the reversed duplicate removal procedure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (3): 275-276.
4. FRANK, M. (2003), Impact Factors: Arbiter of excellence? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91 (l): 4-6.
5. INGWERSEN, P. (1992), Information Retrieval Interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
6. KATZER, J., McGILL, M. J., TESSIER, A., FRAKES, W., DASGUPTA, P. (1982), A study of overlap among document representations. Information Technology: Research and Development, 1 (2): 261-274.
7. LANCASTER, F. W. (1998), Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Library Association Publishing.
8. LARSEN, B. (2002), Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval: Generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers. Scientometrics, 54 (2): 155-178.
9. LEE, J. H. (1997), Analyses of multiple evidence combination. In: BELKIN, N. J., NARASIMHALU, A. D., WILLETT, P., (Eds), SIGIR 97: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Philadelphia, PA: ACM Press, pp. 267-276.
10. MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1996), Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36 (3): 435-444.
11. MAI, J.-E. (2001), Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57 (5): 591-622.
12. McCAIN, K. W. (1989), Description and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature: Retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (2): 110-114.
13. PAO, M. L. (1993), Term and citation retrieval: A field study. Information Processing and Management, 29 (1): 95-112.
14. PAO, M. L. (1994), Relevance odds of retrieval overlaps from seven search fields. Information Processing and Management, 30 (3): 305-314.
15. SARACEVIC, T., KANTOR, P. (1988), A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39 (3): 197-216.
16. SODHA, R. J., AMELSVOORT, T. V. (1994), Multi-database searches in biomedicine: Citation duplication and novelty assessment using carbamazepine as an example. Journal of Information Science, 20 (2) 139-141.