Evaluation of simplified ventilation system with direct air supply through the facade in a school in a cold climate

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157-166

  Mysen, Mads ^a,b   Schild, Peter G ^a   Hellstrand, Vidar ^a   Thunshelle, Kari ^a  

^a Norwegian Bldg Research Institute ^*  (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Demand controlled ventilation; Indoor air quality; Schools; Sick building syndrome (SBS); Thermal comfort

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATOLOGY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; SENSORS; VENTILATION;

DEMAND-CONTROLLED VENTILATION; INDOOR AIR QUALITY; SCHOOLS; SICK BUILDING SYNDROME; THERMAL COMFORT;

SCHOOL BUILDINGS;

EID: 6344277170     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Enova, Energy Statistics of Norwegian Buildings 2002, Enova, Norway, 2003 (in Norwegian).
2. CR 1752, Ventilation for Buildings: Design Criteria for the Indoor Environment, CEN, Brussels, 1998.
3. K. Andersson, The MM-questionnaires - A Tool when Solving Indoor Climate Problems, Ørebro Medical Center Hospital, Sweden, 1993.
4. M. Mysen, Simplified ventilation system at Revetal Secondary School, Norwegian Building Research Institute, Project Report N-9797, Oslo, 2003 (in Norwegian).
5. C.I. Ulriksen, Investigation and comparison of indoor environment quality and use of energy in building using hybrid ventilation systems vs. building with traditional mechanical ventilation systems, M.Eng. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2002 (in Norwegian).
6. H.M. Mathisen, F. Frydenlund, Preventive measures and intervention on carpet removal and ventilation improvement in eleven schools, vol. 1, in: Proceedings of the Healthy Buildings 2000, Helsinki, pp. 219-224.
7. L. Fang, D.P. Wyon, G. Clausen, P.O. Fanger, Sick building syndrome symptoms and performance in a field laboratory study at different levels of temperature and humidity, in: Proceedings of the Indoor Air 2002.
8. Wyon D.P., Fanger P.O., Olesen B.W. The mental performance of subjects clothed for comfort at two different air temperatures. Ergonomics. 18:1975;359-374.
9. L. Berglund, W.S. Cains, Perceived air quality and the thermal environment, in: Proceedings of the IAQ '89, San Diego, 1989, pp. 345-350.
10. Fang L., Clausen G., Fanger P.O. Impact of temperature and humidity on the perception of indoor air quality. Indoor Air. 8(2):1998;80-90.
11. Toftum J., Jørgensen A.S., Fanger P.O. Effect of humidity and temperature of inspired air on perceived comfort. Energy and Buildings. 28(1):1998;15-23.
12. de Dear R.J., Brager G.S. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings. 34:2002;549-561.
13. R.J. de Dear, G. Brager, D. Cooper, Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference, Final Report on RP-884, Macquarie Research Ltd., Australia, 1997.
14. NS-INSTA-800, Cleaning Quality - Measurement System for Evaluation of Cleanliness, 1st ed., October, 2000.
15. Scneider T., Løbner T., Nilsen S.K., Petersen O.H. Quality of cleaning quantified. Building and Environment. 29(3):1994;363-367.