Expecting the public backlash: Public relations lessons for nanotechnology from the biotechnology experience

2004 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2004

Volumn 3, Issue , 2004, Pages 491-493

  Matsuura, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Promotion; Publicity; Regulation

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

INVESTORS; PROMOTIONAL STRATEGIES; PUBLIC PERCEPTION;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 6344276973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Arnall, A., Today's Choice: A report for the Greenpeace Environmental Trust, Greenpeace, London, 2003.
2. Levidow, L., Carr, S., and Wield, D., "European Biotechnology Regulation: Contested boundaries of environmental risk," BioSafety, Vol. 3, Paper 1, 1997, at http://bioline.utsc.utorpnto.ca/archive/00000006/01/ by977001.pdf.
3. Malinowski, M., Biotechnology: Law, Business, and Regulation, Aspen, New York, 1999.
4. Philipkoski, K., "Food Biotech Is Risky Business," Wired News, Dec. 15, 2003, at http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,61096,00.html.
5. Toi Te Taiao: Bioethics Council, Nanotechnology Report of the Toi Te Taiao: Bioethics Council to the Minister of the Environment, New Zealand, 2003, at http://www.bioethics.org.nz/publications/nanotechn ology-report-minister. html.
6. Woods, S., Jones, R., and Geldart, A., The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology, Economic and Social Research Council, 2003.