Digestive strategies in two sympatrically occurring lagomorphs

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 264, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-178

  Kuijper, D P J ^a   Van Wieren, S E ^b   Bakker, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Caecotrophy; Fibre; Hare; Lepus europaeus; Nitrogen digestion; Oryctolagus cuniculus; Rabbit

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DIGESTIBILITY; FOOD QUALITY; FORAGE; HERBIVORY;

LAGOMORPHA; LEPUS; LEPUS EUROPAEUS; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 6344257106     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952836904005722     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Belovsky, G. E. (1997). Optimal foraging and community structure: the allometry of herbivore food selection and competition. Evol. Ecol. 11: 641-672.
2. Björnhag, G. (1994). Adaptations in the large intestine allowing small animals to eat fibrous foods. In The digestive system in mammals: 287-309. Chivers, D. J. & Langer, P. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Chapuis, J. L. (1989). Comparison of the diets of two sympatric lagomorphs, Lepus europaeus and Oryctolagus cuniculus in an agrosystem of the Ile-de-France. Z. Saugetierkd. 55: 176-185.
4. De Blas, C., Garcia, J. & Carabano, R. (1999). Role of fibre in rabbit diets. A review. Ann. Zootech. Paris 48: 3-13.
5. Demment, M. W. & Van Soest, P. J. (1985). A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. Am. Nat. 125: 641-672.
6. Flux, J. E. C. & Fullagar, P. J. (1992). World distribution of the rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus on islands. Mammal Rev. 22: 151-205.
7. Foley, W. J. & Cork, S. J. (1992). Use of fibrous diets by small herbivores: how far can the rules be 'bent'. TREE 7: 159-162.
8. Fraga, M. J., Perez, d. A., Carabano, R. & De Blas, J. C. (1991). Effect of type of fiber on the rate of passage and on the contribution of soft feces to nutrient intake of finishing rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 1566-1574.
9. Garcia, J., Carabano, R. & De Blas, J. C. (1999). Effect of fiber source on cell wall digestibility and rate of passage in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 898-905.
10. Garcia, J., De Blas, J. C., Carabano, R. & Garcia, P. (1995). Effect of type of lucerne hay on caecal fermentation and nitrogen contribution through caecotrophy in rabbits. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 35: 267-275.
11. Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook, No.379. Washington, DC: USDA.
12. Griffiths, M. & Davies, D. (1963). The role of the soft pellets in the production of lactic acid in the rabbit stomach. J. Nutr. 80: 171-180.
13. Grigorov, I. (1989). Compound feed digestibility and nitrogen balance in rabbits dependent on crude fiber level. Zhivotnov'd. Nauki 26: 57-61.
14. Hammond, K. A. & Wunder, B. A. (1991). The role of diet quality and energy need in the nutrional ecology of a small herbivore, Microtus ochrogaster. Physiol. Zool. 64: 541-567.
15. Hewson, R. (1963). Food and feeding habits of the mountain hare Lepus timidus scoticus. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 139: 515-526.
16. Hirakawa, H. (1995). The formation and passage of soft and hard feces in the hindgut of the Japanese hare Lepus brachyurus. J. mammal. Soc. Jpn 20: 89-94.
17. Hirakawa, H. (2001). Coprophagy in leporids and other mammalian herbivores. Mammal Rev. 31: 61-80.
18. Homolka, M. (1987). A comparison of the trophic niches of Lepus europaeus and Oryctolagus cunniculus. Folia Zool. Brno 36: 307-317.
19. Hulbert, I. A. R., Iason, G. R., Elston, D. A. & Racey, P. A. (1996). Home-range sizes in a stratified upland landscape of two lagomorphs with different feeding strategies. J. appl. Ecol. 33: 1479-1488.
20. Hulbert, I. A. R., lason, G. R. & Racey, P. A. (1996). Habitat utilization in a stratified upland landscape by two lagomorphs with different strategies. J. appl. Ecol. 33: 315-324.
21. Iason, G. R. & Van Wieren, S. E. (1999). Digestive and ingestive adaptations of mamalian herbivores to low-quality forage. In Herbivores; between plants and predators: 337-370. Olff, H., Brown, V. K. & Drent, R. H. (Eds). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
22. Jilge, B. (1974). Soft faeces excretion and passage time in the laboratory rabbit. Lab. Anim. 8: 337-346.
23. Justice, K. E. & Smith, F. A. (1992). A model of dietary fibre utilization by small mammalian herbivores with emperical results from Neotona. Am. Nat. 139: 398-416.
24. Karasov, W. H. (1990). Digestion in birds: chemical and physiological determinants and ecological implications. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 391-415.
25. Lange, R., Twisk, P., van Winden, A. & van Diepenbeek, A. (1994). Zoogdieren van West-Europa. Utrecht: KNNV Uitgeverij.
26. Loeb, S. C., Schwab, R. G. & Demment, M. W. (1991). Response of pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) to changes in diet quality. Oecologia (Berl.) 86: 542-551.
27. Nagy, K. A. (1987). Field metabolic rates and food requirements scaling in mammals and birds. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 111-128.
28. Owen, M. (1975). An assessment of faecal analysis technique in waterfowl feeding studies. J. Wildl. Manage. 39: 271-279.
29. Palomares, F. & Delibes, M. (1997). Predation upon European rabbits and their use of open and closed patches in Mediterranean habitats. Oikos 80: 407-410.
30. Pehrson, Å. (1983). Caecotrophy in caged mountain hares (Lepus timidus). J. Zool. (Lond.) 199: 563-574.
31. Prins, H. H. T. & Ydenberg, R. C. (1985). Vegetation growth and the seasonal habitat shift of the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis). Oecologia (Berl.) 66: 122-125.
32. Prop, J. & Vulink, T. (1992). Digestion by barnacle geese in the annual cycle: the interplay between retention time and food quality. Funct. Ecol. 6: 180-189.
33. Sakaguchi, E., Kaizu, K. & Nakamichi, M. (1992). Fibre digestion and digesta retention from different physical forms of the feed in the rabbit. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 102: 559-563.
34. Seber, G. A. F. & Pemberton, J. R. (1979). The line intercept method for study ing plant cuticles from rumen and fecal samples. J. Wildl. Manage. 43: 916-925.
35. Sibly, R. M. (1981). Strategies of digestion and defecation. In Physiological ecology of animals: 109-139. Townsend, C. R. & Calow, P. (Eds). Sunderland: Sinauer.
36. Takahashi, T. & Sakaguchi, E. (1998). Behaviors and nutritional importance of coprophagy in captive adult and young nutrias (Myocastor copyus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 168: 281-288.
37. Toloza, E. M., Lam, M. & Diamond, J. (1991). Nutrient extraction by cold-exposed mice - a test of digestive safety margins. Am. J. Physiol. 261: 608-620.
38. Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Corvallis, OR: O and B Books.
39. Ydenberg, R. C. & Prins, H. H. T. (1981). Spring grazing and the manipulation of food quality by Barnacle geese. J. appl. Ecol. 18: 443-453.
40. Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.