Reproductive ecology of the endemic Lecocarpus pinnatifidus (Asteraceae) in an isolated population in the Galápagos Islands

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 146, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-180

  Philipp, Marianne ^a   Hansen, Lise Bach ^a   Adsersen, Henning ^a   Siegismund, Hans R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Fruit set; Phenology; Pollen deposition; Pollen limitation; Pollination; Self compatibility

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; ENDEMIC SPECIES; ISOLATED POPULATION; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

ECUADOR; GALAPAGOS ISLANDS; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; SOUTH AMERICA;

ASTERACEAE; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LECOCARPUS;

EID: 6344231827     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00323.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abbott RJ, Schmitt J. 1985. Effect of environment on percentage female ray florets per capitulum and outcrossing potential in a self-compatible composite (Senecio vulgaris L. var. hibernicus Syme). New Phytologist 101: 219-229.
2. Adsersen H. 1980. Revision of the Galápagos endemic genus Lecocarpus (Asteraceae). Botanisk Tidsskrift 75: 63-76.
3. Barrett SCH. 1996. The reproductive biology and genetics of island plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351: 725-733.
4. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: Kawano S, ed. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. New York: Academic Press, 229-254.
5. Battjes J, Bachmann K. 1996. Numerical canalisation in Asteraceae heads. In: Caligari PDS, Hind DJN, eds. Compositae: biology & utilization. Proceedings of the international conference, Kew, 1994, 2. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 185-204.
6. Brok CS, Adsersen H. in press. Morphological variation between populations of Lecocarpus (Asteraceae) on the Galápagos Islands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society in press.
7. Cheptou P-O, Lepart J, Escarre J. 2002. Mating system variation along a successional gradient in the allogamous and colonizing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 753-762.
8. Costin BJ, Morgan JW, Young AG. 2001. Reproductive success does not decline in fragmented populations of Leucochrysum albicans subsp. albicans var. tricolour (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 98: 273-284.
9. Eliasson U. 1971. Studies in Galápagos Plants. Svensk Botanisk Tidsskrift 65: 245-277.
10. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implication for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
11. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown ADH, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, eds. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 43-63.
12. Heywood VH. 1978. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Lack AJ. 1982. Competition for pollinators in the ecology of Centaurea scabiosa L. & Centaurea nigra L. New Phytologist 91: 321-339.
14. Lane MA. 1996. Pollination biology of Compositae. In: Caligari PDS, Hind DJN, eds. Compositae: biology & utilization. Proceedings of the international conference, Kew, 1994, 2. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 61-80.
15. Larson BMH, Barrett SCH. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 503-520.
16. Linsley EG, Rick CM, Stephens SG. 1966. Observations on the floral relationships of the Galápagos carpenter bee. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 42: 1-18.
17. Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-97.
18. Lloyd DG. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18: 103-108.
19. Luijten SH, Oosermeijer NC, Leeuwen van NC, Nijs den JCM. 1996. Reproductive success and clonal genetic structure of the rare Arnica montana (Compositae) in The Netherlands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 210: 15-30.
20. Mani MS, Saravanan JM. 1999. Pollination ecology and evolution in Compositae (Asteraceae) USA: Science Publishers, Inc.
21. McMullen CK. 1987. Breeding systems of selected Galápagos Islands angiosperme. American Journal of Botany 74: 1694-1705.
22. McMullen CK. 1989. The Galapagos carpenter bee, just how important is it. Noticias de Galapagos 48: 16-18.
23. McMullen CK. 1990. Reproductive biology of Galápagos Islands angiosperme. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 32: 35-45.
24. Messmore N, Knox JS. 1997. The breeding system of the narrow endemic, Helenium virginicum (Asteraceae). Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 124: 318-321.
25. Nielsen LR, Philipp M, Adsersen H, Siegismund HR. 2000. Breeding system of Scalesia divisa Andersson, an endemic Asteraceae from the Galápagos Islands. Det Norske Vitenskaps-Akademi. I. Matematisk Naturvitenskabelige Klasse, Skrifter, Ny Serie 39: 127-138.
26. Nielsen LR, Philipp M, Siegismund HR. 2002. Selective advantage of ray florets in Scalesia affinis and S. pedunculata (Asteraceae), two endemic species from the Galápagos. Evolutionary Ecology 16: 139-153.
27. Nielsen LR, Siegismund HR, Philipp M. 2003. Partial self-incompatibility in the polyploid endemic species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from the Galápagos: remnants of a self-incompatibility system? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 93-101.
28. Reinartz JA, Les DH. 1994. Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 446-455.
29. Richards AJ. 1986. Plant breeding systems. London: George Allen & Unwin.
30. Schemske DW, Lande R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
31. Schlichting CD, Devlin B. 1989. Male and female reproductive success in the hermaphroditic plant Phlox drummondii. The American Naturalist 113: 212-227.
32. Schoen GJ, Lloyd DG. 1984. The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diasporas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 303-322.
33. Stephenson AG, Quesada MR, Schlichting CD, Winsor JA. 1995. Consequences of variation in pollen load size. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant systematics. Monographs in Systematic Botany 53: 233-244.
34. Stuessy TF, Spooner DM, Evans KA. 1986. Adaptive significance of ray corollas in Helianthus grosseserratus (Compositae). American Naturalist 115: 191-197.
35. Sun M, Ganders FR. 1988. Mixed mating systems in Hawaiian Bidens (Asteraceae). Evolution 42: 516-527.
36. Young AG, Hill JH, Murray BG, Peakall R. 2002. Breeding system, genetic diversity and clonal structure in the subalpine forb Rutidosis leiolepis F. Muell. (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 106: 71-78.