Information management or knowledge management? An informetric view of the dynamics of Academia

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 285-299

  Gu, Yinian ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344228070     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045111.51946.ba     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BIRD, J. E. (1997), Authorship patterns in marine mammal science, 1985-1993. Scientometrics, 39 (1) : 99-105.
2. BLAIR, D. C. (2002), Knowledge management: hype, hope, or help? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12) : 1019-1028.
3. BORDONS, M., FERNANDEZ, M. T., GOMEZ, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53 (2) : 195-206.
4. CALLAHAM, M., WEARS, R. L., WEBER, E. (2002), Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21) : 2847-2850.
5. GLÄNZEL, W. (2002), Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50 (3) : 461-473.
6. GOLDER, W. (2000), Who controls the controllers? Ten statements on the so-called impact factor. Onkologie, 23 (1) : 73-75.
7. GRANGE, R. I. (1999), National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability? BJU international, 84 (6) : 601-603.
8. GREY, D. (1998), Knowledge Management and Information Management: The Differences. [On-line]. Available: http://www.smithweaversmith.com/km-im.htm
9. INGWERSEN, P., LARSEN, B., WORMELL, I. (2000), Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In: B. CRONIN, H. ATKINS (Eds), Web of Knowledge - A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, ASIS Monograph Series. Metford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., pp. 373-387.
10. KING, J. T. (2000), How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery, 47 (2) : 435-440.
11. KPMG (2003). European Knowledge Management Survey 2002/2003. [On-line]. Available: http://www.knowledgeboard.com/download/1935/ kpmg_kmsurvey_results_jan_2003.pdf
12. LEE, K. P., SCHOTLAND, M., BACCHETTI, P., BERO, L. A. (2002), Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21) : 2805-2808.
13. POULIN, R. (2002), Qualitative and quantitative aspects of recent research on helminth parasites. Journal of Helminthology, 76 (4) : 373-376.
14. PRUSAK, L. (2001), Where did knowledge management come from? IBM Systems Journal - Knowledge Management, 40(4): 1002-1007. [On-line]. Available: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/404/prusak.html
15. RENNIE, D., YANK, V., EMANUEL, L. (1997), When authorship fails - a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (7) : 579-585.
16. ROUSSEAU, R., VAN HOOYDONK, G. (1996), Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (10) : 775-780.
17. SCHOONBAERT, D., ROELANTS, G. (1996), Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 1 (6) : 739-752.
18. SEGLEN, P. O., AKSNES, D. W. (2000), Scientific productivity and group size: a bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49 (1) : 125-143.
19. STEGMANN, J., GROHMANN, G. (2001), Citation rates, knowledge export and international visibility of dermatology journals listed and not listed in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 50 (3) : 483-502.