Annular macular neuroretinopathy and multifocal electroretinographic and optical coherence tomographic findings

Retina

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 772-775

  Watzke, Robert C ^a   Shults, William T ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANNULAR MACULAR NEURORETINOPATHY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MULTIFOCAL ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RETINOPATHY; SCOTOMA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ACUTE DISEASE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MIDDLE AGED; RETINAL DISEASES; SCOTOMA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 6344227876     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200410000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Kerrison JB, Pollock SC, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Coffee and doughnut maculopathy: A cause of acute central ring scotomas. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:158-164.
2. Browning AC, Gupta R, Barber C, Lim CS. The multifocal electroretinogram in acute macular neuroretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1506.
3. Chauhan DS, Marshall J. The interpretation of optical coherence tomographic images of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2332-2342.
4. Ko TH, Schuman JS, Fujimoto JG, et al. Comparison of ultrahigh resolution and standard optical coherence tomography for imaging retinal pathologies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:[e-Abstract 4861].
5. O'Brien DM, Farmer SG, Kalina RE, et al. Acute macular neuroretinopathy following adverse reaction to contrast media. Retina 1989;9:281-286.
6. Guzak SV, Kalina RE, Chenoweth RG. Acute macular retinopathy following adverse reaction to intravenous contrast media. Retina 1983;3:312-317.
7. Friedenwald JS. A new approach to some problems of retinal vascular disease. Am J Ophthalmol 1949;32:487-498.