Identification of national trends in nursing education through the use of an online survey

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 248-254

  Morris, Donna L ^b   Fenton, Mary V ^b   Mercer, Zena B ^a  

^a Assoc Prof

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NURSING EDUCATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 6344223313     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Solomon D. Conducting Web-Based Surveys. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2001;7. Available at: http://ericae.net/pare. Accessed June 26, 2002.
2. B. Kaye, T. Johnson Research methodology: Taming the cyber frontier Soc Sci Comp Review 17 1999 323 337
3. J. Houston, D. Fiore Online Medical Surveys: Using the Internet as a Research Tool MD Computing 15 1998 116 120
4. Yun G, Trumbo C. Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, email, & Web Form. Journal of computer-mediated communication 2000;6. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol16/issue1/yun.html.
5. Shannon DM, Johnson TE, Searcy S, Lott A. Using electronic surveys: Advice from survey professionals. Practical assessment, research & evaluation 2002;8. Available at: http://ericae.net/pare. Accessed July 2, 2002.
6. D. Jeffrey, M.D. Houston, D.C. Fiore Online medical surveys: Using the Internet as a research tool MD Computing 16 1998 116 120
7. Schonlau M, Fricker RD Jr, Elliott MN. Literature review of web and email surveys. Conducting research surveys via email and the web. 2001. p. 19-32. Rand Publications. Available at: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1480. Accessed July 2, 2002.
8. The Business Research Lab. (n.d.) A business research lab tip: A discussion of web surveys. Available at: http://www.busreslab.com/tips/tip38. htm. Accessed April 12, 2004.
9. M.E. Duffy Methodological Issues in Web-based Research J Nurs Scholarsh 34 2002 83 88
10. R. Lakeman Using the Internet for Data Collection in Nursing Research Comput Nurs 15 1997 269 275
11. R. Soetikno, R. Mrad, V. Pao, L. Lenert Quality of life research on the Internet: Feasibility and potential biases in patients with ulcerative colitis J Am Med Inform Assoc 4 1997 426 435
12. J. Hadley Epidemiology and the Internet Epidemiology 8 1997 464 465
13. S. Fyfe, H. Leonard, R. Gelmi, A. Tassell, R. Strack Using the Internet to pilot a questionnaire on childhood disability in Rett syndrome Child Care Health Dev 27 2001 535 543
14. J. Fawcett, E. Buhle Using the Internet for Data Collection: An innovative electronic strategy Comp Nurs 13 1995 273-9.
15. W. Bischoff Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implication for professional education. University of Hawaii. 1993. Cited by: Cooper C. The use of electronic mail in the research process Nurse Researcher 7 2000 24 30
16. J. Sorrell, N. Brown, M. Silva, E. Kohlenberg Use of writing portfolios for interdisciplinary assessment of critical thinking outcomes of nursing students Nursing Forum 32 1997 12 24
17. N. Todd Using email in an undergraduate nursing course to increase critical thinking skills Comp Nurs 16 1998 115 118
18. American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2003 Annual Survey. AACN Website. Available at: http://www.aacn.nche.edu. Accessed October 7, 2003.
19. Dommeyer CJ, Moriarty E. Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached. J Market Res Soc Winter 1999/2000.
20. T.K.L. Schleyer, J.L. Forrest Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys J Am Med Inform Assoc 7 2000 416 425
21. R. Jones, N. Pitt Health surveys in the workplace: Comparison of postal, email and world wide web methods Occup Med 49 1999 556 558
22. A. Tse Comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: email vs. mail J Market Res Soc 40 1998 353 361
23. Farmer T. Understanding this thing we call internet research. Available at: http://infotekonline.com/Info_online_New/white_paper_on_internet.htm.
24. M.P. Couper, J. Blair, T. Triplett A comparison of email and email for a survey of employees in U.S. statistical agencies J Official Stat 15 1999 39 56
25. S.E. Anderson, B.M. Gansneder Using electronic mail surveys and computer monitored data for studying computer mediated communication systems Soc Sci Comp Rev 13 1995 33 46
26. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Willey-Interscience; 1978. Cited by: Yun G, Trumbo C. Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, & web form. Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2000;6. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/ jcma/vol6/issue1/yun.html. Accessed July 2, 2002.
27. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Willey-Interscience; 1978. Cited by: Yun G, Trumbo C. Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, & web form. Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2000;6. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/ jcma/vol6/issue1/yun.html. Accessed July 2, 2002.
28. Dennis M. Vice President, Government and Academic Relations, Knowledge Networks, Personal Communication. San Francisco; 2001. Cited by: Schonlau M, Fricker RD Jr, Elliott MN. Literature review of web and email surveys. Conducting research surveys via email and the web, 2001, 19-32. Rand Publications. Available at: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1480. Accessed April 9, 2004.
29. Dennis M. Vice President, Government and Academic Relations, Knowledge Networks, Personal Communication. San Francisco; 2001. Cited by: Schonlau M, Fricker RD Jr, Elliott MN. Literature review of web and email surveys. Conducting research surveys via email and the web, 2001, 19-32. Rand Publications. Available at: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1480. Accessed April 9, 2004.
30. W. King, E. Miles A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pencil measurements: A test of measurement equivalence J Appl Psychol 80 1995 643 651
31. S. Kiesler, L. Sproull Response effects in the electronic survey Public Opinion Quarterly 50 1986 402 413
32. D. Bachman, J. Elfrink Tracking the progress of email versus snail-mail Marketing Research 8 1996 31 35
33. A.M. Paolo, G.A. Bonaminio, C. Gibson, T. Partridge, K. Kallemail Response rate comparisons of email and mail distributed student evaluations Teaching and learning in medicine 12 2000 81 84
34. L. Sproull Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research Acad Manag J 29 1986 159 169
35. W. Schmidt World wide web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp 29 1997 274 279
36. M. Fenton, D. Morris The integration of holistic nursing practices and complementary and alternative modalities into curricula of schools of nursing Altern Ther Health Med 9 2003 62 67
37. Dillman D, Tortora R, Bowker D. Principles for writing web surveys. Available at: http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/websurveyppr.pdf. Accessed April 9, 2004.
38. D. Schaefer, D. Dillman Development of a standard email methodology: Results of an experiment Public Opinion Quarterly 62 1998 378 397
39. Sheehan K, Hoy M. Using email to survey internet users in the United States: Methodology and assessment. J Comp Mediated Comm 1999;4. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/sheehan.html.