A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Ji, Soo Yeon ^a   Smith, Rebecca ^a   Huynh, Toan ^b   Najarian, Kayvan ^a  

^a Virginia Commonwealth University   (United States)

^b LEVINE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION TREE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PREDICTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURVIVAL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN INJURY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; INJURY SCALE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN INJURIES; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES;

EID: 63349110176     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Deaths: Injuries, 2001. RN Anderson AM Minino LA Fingerhut M Warner MA Heinen Eds, National Vital Statistics Reports 2001 52 21 1 87
2. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Facts about Concussion and Brain Injury and Where to Get Help. Atlanta, GA 2004
3. The Coalition for American Trauma. http://www.traumacoalition.org
4. Expert Working Group, Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Assessing Outcomes in Children. Atlanta, GA 2000
5. Blunt carotid injury: Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. TC Fabian JH Patton MA Croce G Minard KA Kudsk FE Pritchard, Ann Surg 1996 223 5 513 525 8651742
6. Linguistic rule extraction from neural networks for descriptive data mining. I Jagielska, Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems: 21-23 Apr 1998, Adelaide 1998 89 92
7. Effectiveness of Helicopter versus Ground Ambulance Services for Interfacility Transport. CL Arfken MJ Shapiro PQ Bessey B Littenberg, Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care 1998 45 4 785 790 9783622
8. A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene. P Cunningham R Rutledge CC Baker TV Clancy, J Trauma 1997 43 26 940 946 9420109
9. Efficient C4.5. S Ruggieri, IEEE Trans on Knowl and Data Eng 2002 14 2 438 444
10. An intelligent method for computer-aided trauma decision making system. SY Ji T Huynh K Najarian, ACM-SE 45: Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference 2007 198 202
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of helicopter EMS for trauma patients. PA Gearhart R Wuerz AR Localio, Ann Emerg Med 1997 30 4 500 506 9326865
12. Helicopter Transport of Pediatric Trauma Patients in an Urban Emergency Medical Services System: A Critical Analysis. M Eckstein T Jantos N Kelly A Cardillo, J Trauma 2002 53 2 340 344 12169944
13. Decision support in medicine: examples from the HELP system. PJ Haug RM Gardner KE Tate, Comput Biomed Res 1994 27 5 396 418 7813202
14. Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. JM Fitzmaurice K Adams JM Eisenberg, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002 9 2 144 160 11861630
15. Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J Quinlan, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1996 4 77 90
16. Computer-generated trauma management plans: comparison with actual care. JR Clarke CZ Hayward TA Santora DK Wagner BL Webber, World J Surg 2002 26 5 536 538 12098040
17. Neural Networks and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering. K Najarian A Darvish, Wiley Encyclopaedia of Biomedical Engineering Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Akay M, 2006
18. Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. PJ Andrews DH Sleeman PF Statham A McQuatt V Corruble PA Jones TP Howells CS Macmillan, J Neurosurg 2003 97 2 440 442 12186460
19. Combining non-parametric models with logistic regression: an application to motor vehicle injury data. PM Kuhnert K Do R McClure, Comput Stat Data Anal 2000 34 3 371 386
20. Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury. DF Signorini PJD Andrews PA Jones JM Wardlaw JD Miller, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999 66 20 25 9886445
21. Combining logistic regression with classification and regression tree to predict quality of care in a home health nursing data set. HM Guo YI Shyu HK Chang, Stud Health Technology Inform 2006 122 891
22. CART and logistic regression analyses of risk factors for first dose hypotension by an ACE-inhibitor. J Hasford H Ansari K Lehmann, Therapie 1993 48 5 479 482 8146829
23. A Comparative Study of Different Machine Learning Approaches for Decision Making. A Kelemen Y Liang S Franklin, Advances in Simulation, Computational Methods and and Soft Computing Piraeus, Greece: WSEAS Press, Mastorakis E, 2002
24. Statistical Methods. GW Snedecor WG Cochran, Iowa State University Press 8 1989
25. A comparison of logistic regression to decision-tree induction in a medical domain. WJ Long JL Griffth HP Selker RB D'Agostino, Comput Biomed Res 1993 26 74 97 8444029
26. Compression-Based Discretization of Continuous Attributes. B Pfahringer, Proc. 12th Int'l Conf. Machine Learning: Tahoe City 1995 456 463
27. The problem of bias in training data in regression problems in medical decision support. B Mac Namee P Cunningham S Byrne OI Corrigan, AI Med 2002 24 51 70 11779685
28. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial Neural networks versus Logistic regression for predicting medical outcome. JV Tu, J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49 11 1225 1231 8892489
29. Classification and Regression Trees. L Breiman, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall 1993
30. Tree-Structured Classification via Generalized Discriminant Analysis. WY Loh N Vanichsetakul, Journal of the American Statistical Association 1988 83 403 715 725
31. Combining loglinear model with classification and regression tree (CART): an application to birth data. CY Fu, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2004 45 4 865 874
32. Generating production rules from decision trees. JR Quinlan, Proc. 10th Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-87): 1987, Milan 1987 997 1003
33. JR Quinlan, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann 1993
34. Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games. JR Quinlan, Machine Learning, An Artificial Intelligence Approach Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Publishing Company, Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, Mitchell TM, 1983 463 482
35. A short introduction to boosting. Y Freund R Schapire, J Japan Soc for Artif Intel 1999 14 5 771 780
36. The application of AdaBoost for distributed, scalable and on-line learning. W Fan SJ Stolfo J Zhang, KDD '99: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining 1999 362 366
37. V Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory New York: Wiley 1998
38. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. T Joachims, Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, 1398, Chemnitz, DE 1998 137 142
39. Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. TS Furey N Cristianini N Duffy DW Bednarski M Schummer D Haussler, Bioinformatics 2000 16 10 906 914 11120680
40. Robust radial basis function neural networks. C Lee P Chung J Tsai C Chang, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, IEEE Transactions on 1999 29 6 674 685 18252348
41. Performance evaluation of a sequential minimal radial basisfunction (RBF) neural network learning algorithm. Y Lu N Sundararajan P Saratchandran, IEEE Trans Neural Networks 1998 9 2 308 318 18252454
42. Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. M Stone, J Royal Statistic Soc Series B (Methodological) 1974 36 2 111 147
43. D Hosmer S Lemeshow, Applied Logistic Regression (Wiley Series In Probability and Statistics) New York: Wiley 1989 Chapter 1