Decision-making and prepotent response inhibition functions in excessive internet users

CNS Spectrums

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 75-81

  Sun, De Lin ^a   Chen, Zu Ji ^a   Ma, Ning ^a   Zhang, Xiao Chu ^b   Fu, Xian Ming ^c   Zhang, Da Ren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^c Department of Neurosurgery   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHINA; CHINESE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; GAMBLING TASK; GO/NO GO TASK; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; INTERNET ADDICTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL PROBLEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTERNET; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63349103044     PISSN: 10928529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1092852900000225     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Griffiths MD. Internet addiction: an issue for clinical psychology? Clinical Psychology Forum. 1996;97:302-336.
2. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1:237-244.
3. Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use (PIU). Computers in Human Behavior. 2001;17:187-195.
4. Allison SE, von Wahlde L, Shockley T, Gabbard GO. The development of the self in the era of the internet and role-playing fantasy games. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:381-385.
5. Sun DL, Ma N, Bao M, Chen XC, Zhang DR. Computer games: a double-edged sword? Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:545-548.
6. Block JJ. Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165:306-307.
7. Shaw M, Black DW. Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs. 2008;22:353-365.
8. Liu T, Potenza MN. Problematic Internet use: clinical implications. CNS Spectr 2007;12:453-466.
9. Pallanti S, Bernardi S, Quercioli L. The Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire and the Internet Addiction Scale in the assessment of multiple addictions in a high-school population: prevalence and related disability. CNS Spectr. 2006;11:966-974.
10. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1458-1463.
11. Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future conse- quences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50:7-15.
12. Bechara A, Dolan S, Hindes A. Decision-making and addiction (part II): myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1690-1705.
13. Bechara A, Damasio H. Decision-making and addiction (part I): impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1675-1689.
14. Verdejo-Garcia A, Rivas-Perez C, Vilar-Lopez R, Perez-Garcia M. Strategic self-regulation, decision-making and emotion processing in poly-substance abusers in their first year of abstinence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:139-146.
15. Cavedini P, Riboldi G, Keller R, D'Annucci A, Bellodi L. Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51:334-341.
16. Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W. Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23:137-151.
17. Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004;133:101-135.
18. Rubia K, Russell T, Overmeyer S, et al. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activa- tions across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage 2001;13:250-261.
19. Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:220-246.
20. Kaufman JN, Ross TJ, Stein EA, Garavan H. Cingulate hypoactivity in cocaine users during a GO-NOGO task as revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2003;23:7839-7843.
21. Hester R, Garavan H. Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discor- dant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24:11017-11022.
22. Fuentes D, Tavares H, Artes R, Gorenstein C. Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006;12:907-912.
23. Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W. Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction. 2006;101:534-547.
24. Verdejo-Garcia A, Benbrook A, Funderburk F, et al. The differential relationship between cocaine use and marijuana use on decision-making performance over repeat testing with the Iowa Gambling Task. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;90:2-11.
25. Grant JE, Brewer JA, Potenza MN. The neurobiology of substance and behavioral addictions. CNS Spectr. 2006;11:924-930.
26. Holden C. 'Behavioral' addictions: do they exist? Science 2001;294:980-982.
27. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lee GP. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J Neurosci 1999;19:5473-5481.
28. Sakagami M, Pan X, Uttl B. Behavioral inhibition and prefrontal cortex in decision- making. Neural Netw. 2006;19:1255-1265.
29. Bechara A. The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain Cogn. 2004;55:30-40.
30. Garavan H, Pankiewicz J, Bloom A, et al. Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomi- cal specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1789-1798.
31. Wexler BE, Gottschalk CH, Fulbright RK, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:86-95.
32. Potenza MN, Steinberg MA, Skudlarski P, et al. Gambling urges in pathological gambling: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:828-836.
33. Zhang XC, Chen XC, Yu YQ, et al. Masked smoking-related images modulate brain activity in smokers. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 (Published Online, DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20552).
34. Childress AR, Ehrman RN, Wang Z, et al. Prelude to passion: limbic activation by "unseen" drug and sexual cues. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1506.
35. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ. The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1444-1451.
36. Thalemann R, Wolfling K, Grusser SM. Specific cue reactivity on computer game- related cues in excessive gamers. Behav Neurosci 2007;121:614-618.
37. IResearch Consulting Group. Yearly report 2006: The 6th Chinese Online Game Research Report. Available at: http://down.iresearch.cn/Reports/Free/969.html. Accessed July 28, 2008.
38. Green CS, Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 2003;423:534-537.
39. Green CS, Bavelier D. Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players. Cognition. 2006;101:217-245.
40. Castel AD, Pratt J, Drummond E. The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search. Acta Psychol(Amst) 2005;119:217-230.