Moby and moby 2: Creatures of the deep (Web)

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 114-128

  Vandervalk, Ben P ^a   McCarthy, E Luke ^a   Wilkinson, Mark D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Data integration; Distributed SPARQL; OWL; RDF; Semantic Web; Semantic Web services

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; BIOINFORMATICS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA MINING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; ONLINE SYSTEM; REFERENCE DATABASE; SEMANTICS; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 63349096555     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn051     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (75)

1. Etzold T, Ulyanov A, Argos P. SRS: Information retrieval system for molecular biology data banks. Methods in Enzymol 1996;266 114-28.
2. The TAMBIS Project. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~stevensr/tambis/ (21 September 2008, date last accessed).
3. Stevens R, Baker P, Bechhofer S, et al. Transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources. IBM Syst J 2001;40 (2):532-52.
4. Grethe JS, Baru C, Gupta A, et al. Biomedical informatics research network: Building a national collaboratory to hasten the derivation of new understanding and treatment of disease. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005;112:100-9.
5. Covitz PA, Hartel F, Schaefer C, et al. caCORE: A common infrastructure for cancer informatics. Bioinformatics 2003;19 2404-12.
6. Wilkinson MD, Links M. BioMOBY: An open-source biological web services proposal. Brief Bioinform 2002;3(4): 331-41.
7. Wilkinson MD, Senger M, Kawas E, et al. Interoperability with Moby 1.0 - it's better than sharing your toothbrush! Brief Bioinform 2008;9(3):220-31.
8. Stevens RD, Robinson AJ, Goble CA. myGrid: Personalised bioinformatics on the information grid. Bioinformatics 2003;19:i302-4.
9. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic web. Scientific American. 2001;284:34-43.
10. The World Wide Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework. http://www.w3.org/RDF/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
11. Bergman MK. The deep web: Surfacing hidden value. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2001;7(1).
12. Wikipedia. Deep Web. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Web (31 July 2008, data last accessed).
13. Simple Semantic Web and Architecture and Protocol (SSWAP). http://sswap.info (22 September 2008, date last accessed).
14. Belleau F, Nolin M, Tourigny N, et al. Bio2RDF: Towards a mashup to build bioinformatics knowledge systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008;41(5):706-16.
15. Stein L. Integrating biological databases. Nat Rev Genet 2003;4 337-45.
16. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9.
17. The Gene Ontology. Current Annotations. http://www.geneontology.org/GO.current.annotations.shtml (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
18. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, et al. The bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res 2002;12(10): 1611-8.
19. The BioJava Project. http://biojava.org/wiki/Main_Page (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
20. Stein L. Creating a bioinformatics nation. Nature 2002;417: 119-20.
21. The Gene Ontology. AmiGO. http://amigo.geneontology.org (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
22. Uniprot. http://www.uniprot.org (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
23. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu C. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:D115-9.
24. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. http://www.genome.jp/kegg/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
25. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28(1):27-30.
26. The World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
27. The World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
28. The World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
29. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. http://www.oasis-open.org (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
30. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. OASIS UDDI Specifications. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm#uddiv2 (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
31. The World Wide Web Consortium. XML Schema. http://www.w3.org/XML/ Schema (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
32. Oinn T, Addis M, Ferris J, et al. Taverna: A tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics 2004;20(17):3045-54.
33. The World Wide Web Consortium. W3C SemanticWeb Activity. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
34. The World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences (HCLS) Interest Group. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
35. The World Wide Web Consortium. URIs, URLs, and URNs: Clarifications and Recommendations 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
36. Rosse C, Mejino JLV. The foundational model of anatomy ontology. In: Burger A, Davidson D, Baldock R (eds). Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Principles and Practice, Vol. 6. London: Springer, 2007, 59-117.
37. The OBI Consortium. http://purl.obofoundry.org/obo/obi/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
38. Good BM, Wilkinson MD. The life sciences semantic web is full of creeps! Brief Bioinform 2006;7(3):275-86.
39. Clark T, Martin S, Liefeld T. Globally distributed object identification for biological knowledgebases. Brief Bioinform 2004;5 (1):59-70.
40. Zhao J, Wroe C, Goble C, et al. Using semantic web technologies for representing E-science provenance. In: McIlraith S, Plexousakis D, van Harmelen F (eds). The Semantic Web - ISWC 2004. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer, 2004, 92-106.
41. Page RDM. Biodiversity informatics: The challenge of linking data and the role of shared identifiers. Brief Bioinform 2008;9 (5):345-54.
42. Persistent URL Home Page. http://purl.org (4 September 2008, date last accessed).
43. Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group. Mailing List Archives http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/publicsemweb-lifesci/ 2004Apr/0006.html (4 September 2008, date last accessed).
44. Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group. Mailing List Archives http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/ 2008May/0047.html (4 September 2008, date last accessed).
45. World Wide Web Consortium. A Prototype Knowledge Base for the Life Sciences. http://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-kb/ (4 September 2008, date last accessed).
46. URI-Based Naming Systems for Science. http://sw.neurocommons.org/2007/ uri-note/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
47. World Wide Web Consortium. Experiences with the Conversion of SenseLab Databases to RDF/OWL. http://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-senselab/ (4 September 2008, date last accessed).
48. The World Wide Web Consortium. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
49. The World Wide Web Consortium. SPARQL Protocol for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
50. Quilitz B, Leser U. Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In: Bechhofer S, Hauswirth M, Hoffman J, Koubarakis M (eds). The Semantic Web: Research and Applications - ESWC 2008. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 524-38.
51. Langegger A, Wöß W, Blöchl M. A semantic web middleware for virtual data integration. In: Bechhofer S, Hauswirth M, Hoffman J, Koubarakis M (eds). The Semantic Web: Research and Applications - ESWC 2008. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 493-507.
52. Tummarello G, Delbru R, Oren E. Sindice.com: Weaving the open linked data. In: The Semantic Web - ISWC 2007. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 552-65.
53. Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2004, 652-9.
54. Hogan A, Harth A, Umrich J. Towards a scalable search and query engine for the web. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM, 2007, 1301-2.
55. Virtuoso SPARQL Demo Site. http://demo.openlinksw.com/sparql/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
56. Hewlett Packard Labs Semantic Web Research. ARQ - A SPARQL Parser for Jena. http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/ (31 July 2008, data last accessed).
57. Redland RDF Libraries. Rasqal RDF Query Library - Rasqal RDF parser utility. http://librdf.org/rasqal/roqet.html (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
58. Beckett D. The design and implementation of the Redland RDF application framework. Comput Netw 2002; 39:577-88.
59. Broekstra J, Kampman A, van Harmelen F. Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema. In: The Semantic Web - ISWC 2002. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2002, 54-68.
60. Carroll J, Dickinson I, Dollin C, et al. Jena: Implementing the Semantic Web Recommendations. New York: ACM, 2004, 74-83.
61. OpenLink Universal Data Integration Middleware. Virtuoso Product Family. http://www.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
62. Maglott D, Ostell J, Pruitt K, Tatusova T. Entrez gene: Gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:D54-8.
63. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, et al. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30(1): 52-5.
64. Pubmed Home. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
65. Lein E, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 2006;445: 168-76.
66. Shepherd GM, Healy HD, Singer MS, et al. A project in multidisciplinary, multilevel sensory integration. In: Koslow SH, Huerta MF (eds). Neuroinformatics: An Overview of the Human Brain Project Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
67. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25:1251-5.
68. Kotecha N, Bruck K, Lu W, Shah N. Pathway knowledge base: Integrating BioPAX compliant data sources. In: HCLS Workshop, ISWC, 2006.
69. BioPAX: Biological Pathway Exchange. http://www.biopax.org/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
70. Joshi-Tope G, Gillespie M, Vastrik I. Reactome: A knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D428-32.
71. Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, et al. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;19:6083-9.
72. Oracle Spatial. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/products/spatial/pdf/rdfrm.pdf (8 September 2008, date last accessed).
73. The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
74. The World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).
75. CardioSHARE: Cardiovascular Semantic Health and Research Environment. http://cardioshare.icapture.ubc.ca/ (31 July 2008, date last accessed).